Cited by 414Names, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologyExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automatic associations and discrimination in hiring: Real world evidence

Rooth, Dan-Olof·2010·Labour Economics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.labeco.2009.04.005

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 49 references

7 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–414 of 414

Metadata

Authors
Rooth, D.-O.
Affiliations
IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE)
Corresponding author
Rooth, Dan-Olof
Venue
Labour Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
523-534
ISSN
0927-5371 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084416618
Cited by
413
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 25
FWCI
51.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Labour Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
automatic associations, implicit attitudes, recruiters, hiring decisions, Implicit Association Test, labor market discrimination, field experiments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review