Cited by 167Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFace Recognition and PerceptionDeception detection and forensic psychology

The interaction of emotional and cognitive neural systems in emotionally guided response inhibition

Shafritz, Keith M., Collins, Susan H., Blumberg, Hilary P.·2006·NeuroImage

Abstract

The ability to generate appropriate responses in social situations often requires the integration of emotional information conveyed through facial expressions with ongoing cognitive processes. Neuroimaging studies have begun to address how cognitive and emotional neural systems interact, but most of these studies have used emotional oddball stimuli as distractors in order to dissociate emotional from cognitive neural systems. Therefore, the manner in which these systems interact when behavioral responses must be directly guided by the emotional content of stimuli remains elusive. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the neural systems involved in response inhibition for faces conveying particular emotions. Participants performed go/no-go tasks involving either letters or happy and sad faces. The fMRI results indicated that inhibiting responses to emotional faces activated inferior frontal/insular cortex, whereas response inhibition during the letter task did not strongly engage this region. In addition, distinct regions of ventral anterior cingulate were preferentially activated for sad faces in the go and no-go conditions. These findings suggest that inhibition within an emotional context recruits a distinct set of brain regions that includes areas beyond those normally activated by response inhibition tasks and that can be modulated by emotional valence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.053

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In responding to infant social cues, mothers need to integrate affective and cognitive information about their baby, and evaluate competing demands, before choosing the most appropriate behavioral response.

    “In responding to infant social cues, whether positive or negative, mothers need to integrate both affective and cognitive information about their baby, and evaluate competing demands, before choosing the most appropriate behavioral response (52;53).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shafritz, K. M., Collins, S. H., & Blumberg, H. P.
Affiliations
  • Drew University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Shafritz, Keith M.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
468-475
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990494474
Cited by
167
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
response inhibition, emotional facial expressions, facial expression recognition, emotional valence, inferior frontal cortex, insula, ventral anterior cingulate cortex, go/no-go task, social cognition
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Discrimination Learning, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Inhibition, Psychological, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychomotor Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review