CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 586Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maturation of Brain Function Associated With Response Inhibition

TAMM, LEANNE, MENON, VINOD, REISS, ALLAN L.·2002·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
DOI 10.1097/00004583-200210000-00013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective To investigate the developmental trajectory of response inhibition and, more specifically, whether there is a dissociation of function in the prefrontal cortex over the course of development of executive function and associated response inhibition abilities.Method Nineteen typically developing subjects, ranging in age from 8 to 20, performed a Go/NoGo task while behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were collected.Results All subjects performed the task with few errors of omission and commission. No relationship between accuracy and age emerged, but the ability to inhibit responses significantly improved with age. Analyses of fMRI data revealed a positive correlation between activation and age in the left inferior frontal gyrus/insula/orbitofrontal gyrus, and a negative correlation between activation and age in the left middle/superior frontal gyri.Conclusion These data provide the first evidence of dissociable processes occurring in the prefrontal cortex during development of executive functions associated with response inhibition: (1) Younger subjects activate more extensively than older subjects in discrete regions of the prefrontal cortex, presumably due to increased demands and inefficient recruitment of brain regions subserving executive functions including working memory. (2) Older subjects show increasingly focal activation in specific regions thought to play a more critical role in response inhibition.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-200210000-00013

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive brain development is heteromodal.

    “The heteromodal nature of cognitive brain development is evident from studies of neurocognitive performance (6, 7), functional imaging (functional MRI or positronemission tomography) (8–10), and electroencephalogram coherence studies (1, 2, 10).”

    From Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood (2004) · cites this paper as [7]

  • fMRI data revealed age-related increases in activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus extending to the orbitofrontal cortex and age-related decreases in activation in both the left superior and middle frontal gyrus extending to the cingulate.

    “fMRI data revealed age-related increases in activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus extending to the orbitofrontal cortex and, consistent with Casey et al.'s results, age-related decreases in activation in both the left superior and middle frontal gyrus extending to the cingulate.”

    From Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition (2006) · cites this paper as Tamm, Menon, & Reiss, 2002

  • In the second Go/No-Go study, there was no difference in accuracy on the task with age, but reaction times to inhibit responses successfully significantly decreased with age.

    “While there was no difference in accuracy on the task with age, reaction times to inhibit responses successfully significantly decreased with age.”

    From Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition (2006) · cites this paper as Tamm, Menon, & Reiss, 2002

  • The behavioral trend of improving response inhibition generally coincides with linear increases in focal recruitment of lateral prefrontal cortex across development.

    “and, though the evidence is a bit mixed, this behavioral trend is generally found to coincide with linear increases in the focal recruitment of the IPFC across this developmental period [73–80, though see also 81–84].”

    From The role of the anterior insula in adolescent decision making (2014) · cites this paper as [80]

  • On a Go-NoGo task, DLPFC and OFC activation is greater in children than adolescents and greater in adolescents than adults; adults show the lowest dorsolateral but equal orbitofrontal activation and better inhibitory control performance.

    “Studies measuring behavioral inhibition on a Go-NoGo task and fMRI data reveal greater activation of DLPFC and OFC in children than in adolescents, and greater in adolescents than in adults, with the adults showing the lowest dorsolateral, but equal orbitofrontal activation and greater inhibitory control performance (Casey et al., 1997; Tamm et al., 2002).”

    From Impulsivity, frontal lobes and risk for addiction (2009) · cites this paper as Tamm et al., 2002

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Band, 2000, The ability to activate and inhibit speeded responses: separate developmental trends, J Exp Child Psychol, 75, 263, 10.1006/jecp.1999.2538 · DOI
  2. Belger, 1998, Dissociation of mnemonic and perceptual processes during spatial and nonspatial working memory using fMRI, Hum Brain Mapp, 6, 14, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:1<14::AID-HBM2>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  3. Bell, 1985, Cue significance and response regulation in 3- to 6-year-old children's learning of multiple choice discrimination tasks, Dev Psychobiol, 18, 229, 10.1002/dev.420180304 · DOI
  4. Bermudez-Rattoni, 1991, Insular cortex and amygdala lesions differentially affect acquisition on inhibitory avoidance and conditioned taste aversion, Brain Res, 549, 165, 10.1016/0006-8993(91)90616-4 · DOI
  5. Blakemore, 1998, How do we predict the consequences of our actions? A functional imaging study, Neuropsychologia, 36, 521, 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00145-0 · DOI
  6. Carver, 2001, Age related changes in inhibitory control as measured by stop-signal task performance, Int J Neurosci, 107, 43, 10.3109/00207450109149756 · DOI
  7. Collette, 1999, Regional brain activity during tasks devoted to the central executive of working memory, Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 7, 411, 10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00045-7 · DOI
  8. D'Esposito, 1998, Functional MRI studies of spatial and nonspatial working memory, Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 7, 1, 10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00004-4 · DOI
  9. Dowsett, 2000, The development of inhibitory control in preschool children: effects of “executive skills” training, Dev Psychobiol, 36, 161, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(200003)36:2<161::AID-DEV7>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
  10. Friston, 1995, Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach, Hum Brain Mapp, 2, 189, 10.1002/hbm.460020402 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Garavan, 1999, Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 96, 8301, 10.1073/pnas.96.14.8301 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Glover, 1998, Self-navigated spiral fMRI: interleaved versus single-shot, Magn Reson Med, 39, 361, 10.1002/mrm.1910390305 · DOI
  13. Hayes C, Mathias C (1996), Improved brain coil for fMRI and high resolution imaging. In: ISMRM 4th Annual Meeting Proceedings, New York, April 27–May 3
  14. Holmes, 1998, Generalizability, random effects, and population inference, Neuroimage, 7, 754, 10.1016/S1053-8119(18)31587-8 · DOI
  15. Konishi, 1999, Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI, Brain, 122, 981, 10.1093/brain/122.5.981 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Lee, 2001, Neural correlates of response inhibition for behavioral regulation in humans assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging, Neurosci Lett, 309, 109, 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02043-2 · DOI
  17. Liddle, 2001, Event-related fMRI study of response inhibition, Hum Brain Mapp, 12, 100, 10.1002/1097-0193(200102)12:2<100::AID-HBM1007>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI
  18. Livesey, 1991, The development of response inhibition in 4- and 5-year-old children, Aust J Psychol, 43, 133, 10.1080/00049539108260137 · DOI
  19. Luciana, 1998, The functional emergence of prefrontally-guided working memory systems in four- to eight-year-old children, Neuropsychologia, 36, 273, 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00109-7 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Menon, 2001, Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task, Hum Brain Mapp, 12, 131, 10.1002/1097-0193(200103)12:3<131::AID-HBM1010>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
  21. Omori, 1999, Neuronal substrates participating in attentional set-shifting of rules for visually guided motor selection: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation, Neurosci Res, 33, 317, 10.1016/S0168-0102(99)00022-X · DOI
  22. Passler, 1985, Neuropsychological development of behavior attributed to frontal lobe functioning in children, Dev Neuropsychol, 1, 349, 10.1080/87565648509540320 · DOI
  23. Pfefferbaum, 1994, A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study of changes in brain morphology from infancy to late adulthood, Arch Neurol, 51, 874, 10.1001/archneur.1994.00540210046012 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Poline, 1997, Combining spatial extent and peak intensity to test for activations in functional imaging, Neuroimage, 5, 83, 10.1006/nimg.1996.0248 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Rowe, 2001, Working memory for location and time: activity in prefrontal area 46 relates to selection rather than maintenance in memory, Neuroimage, 14, 77, 10.1006/nimg.2001.0784 · DOI
  26. Rowe, 2000, The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory?, Science, 288, 1656, 10.1126/science.288.5471.1656 · DOI
  27. Rubia, 1998, Inhibitory dysfunction in hyperactive boys, Behav Brain Res, 94, 25, 10.1016/S0166-4328(97)00166-6 · DOI
  28. Rubia, 2000, Functional frontalisation with age: mapping neurodevelopmental trajectories with fMRI, Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 24, 13, 10.1016/S0149-7634(99)00055-X · DOI · Paper page
  29. Rubia, 2001, Mapping motor inhibition: conjunctive brain activations across different versions of go/no-go and stop tasks, Neuroimage, 13, 250, 10.1006/nimg.2000.0685 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Savage, 2001, Prefrontal regions supporting spontaneous and directed application of verbal learning strategies: evidence from PET, Brain, 124, 219, 10.1093/brain/124.1.219 · DOI
  31. Schachar, 1990, Impulsivity and inhibitory control in normal development and childhood psychopathology, Dev Psychol, 26, 710, 10.1037/0012-1649.26.5.710 · DOI
  32. Schoenbaum, 1998, Orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala encode expected outcomes during learning, Nat Neurosci, 1, 155, 10.1038/407 · DOI
  33. Sowell, 1999, Localizing age-related changes in brain structure between childhood and adolescence using statistical parametric mapping, Neuroimage, 9, 587, 10.1006/nimg.1999.0436 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Tremblay, 2000, Reward-related neuronal activity during go-no go task performance in primate orbitofrontal cortex, J Neurophysiol, 83, 1864, 10.1152/jn.2000.83.4.1864 · DOI
  35. Wise, 1999, Brain regions involved in articulation, Lancet, 353, 1057, 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07491-1 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Zelazo, 1996, An age-related dissociation between knowing rules and using them, Cogn Dev, 11, 37, 10.1016/S0885-2014(96)90027-1 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
TAMM, L., MENON, V., & REISS, A. L.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
TAMM, LEANNE
ORCID
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-10
Volume
41
Issue
10
Pages
1231-1238
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/00004583-200210000-00013
OpenAlex
W1979944672
Cited by
586
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 27
FWCI
9.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-19908, MH62430, MH-50047, MH01142, K02MH001142, R01MH050047, R03MH062430, T32MH019908)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K25HD040761, HD40761, R01HD031715, HD31715)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
response inhibition, executive function, prefrontal cortex, brain maturation, developmental trajectories, go/no-go task, inferior frontal gyrus, orbitofrontal cortex, frontal cortex activation, working memory, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Brain Mapping, Child, Humans, Human Development, Inhibition, Psychological, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Reaction Time, Multivariate Analysis, Linear Models, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review