Cited by 94Heavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Prenatal lead exposure impacts cross-hemispheric and long-range connectivity in the human fetal brain

Open access
Thomason, Moriah E., Hect, Jasmine L., Rauh, Virginia A., Trentacosta, Christopher, Wheelock, Muriah D., Eggebrecht, Adam T., Espinoza-Heredia, Claudia, Burt, S. Alexandra·2019·NeuroImage

Abstract

Lead represents a highly prevalent metal toxicant with potential to alter human biology in lasting ways. A population segment that is particularly vulnerable to the negative consequences of lead exposure is the human fetus, as exposure events occurring before birth are linked to varied and long-ranging negative health and behavioral outcomes. An area that has yet to be addressed is the potential that lead exposure during pregnancy alters brain development even before an individual is born. Here, we combine prenatal lead exposure information extracted from newborn bloodspots with the human fetal brain functional MRI data to assess whether neural network connectivity differs between lead-exposed and lead-naïve fetuses. We found that neural connectivity patterns differed in lead-exposed and comparison groups such that fetuses that were not exposed demonstrated stronger age-related increases in cross-hemispheric connectivity, while the lead-exposed group demonstrated stronger age-related increases in posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) to lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) connectivity. These are the first results to demonstrate metal toxicant-related alterations in human fetal neural connectivity. Remarkably, the findings point to alterations in systems that support higher-order cognitive and regulatory functions. Objectives for future work are to replicate these results in larger samples and to test the possibility that these alterations may account for significant variation in future child cognitive and behavioral outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.017

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lead and other pollutants are damaging to the developing brain and PFC.

    “Similarly, we can find lead and other pollutants to be damaging to the developing brain and PFC [331–334].”

    From Development of prefrontal cortex (2022) · cites this paper as [331]

    The Discussion reports that lead-exposed fetuses deviated from typical brain-development patterns, and the Results identify altered connectivity involving a frontal region. This supports a concern about prenatal lead and the developing brain, including prefrontal circuitry, but the study did not test other pollutants or demonstrate direct damage to the PFC. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomason, M. E., Hect, J. L., Rauh, V. A., Trentacosta, C., Wheelock, M. D., Eggebrecht, A. T., Espinoza-Heredia, C., & Burt, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Thomason, Moriah E.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
191
Pages
186-192
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913441973
Cited by
94
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (T32 MH100019, ES026022, MH110793, K01 MH103594)
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
prenatal lead exposure, fetal brain development, neural network connectivity, long-range connectivity, posterior cingulate cortex, lateral prefrontal cortex, developmental neurotoxicity, cognitive and behavioral outcomes
MeSH terms
Brain, Female, Fetus, Humans, Lead, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neural Pathways, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Lead Poisoning, Nervous System, Childhood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review