Cited by 130Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsNeonatal and fetal brain pathology

Intrinsic Functional Brain Architecture Derived from Graph Theoretical Analysis in the Human Fetus

Open access
Thomason, Moriah E., Brown, Jesse A., Dassanayake, Maya T., Shastri, Rupal, Marusak, Hilary A., Hernandez-Andrade, Edgar, Yeo, Lami, Mody, Swati +3 more·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

The human brain undergoes dramatic maturational changes during late stages of fetal and early postnatal life. The importance of this period to the establishment of healthy neural connectivity is apparent in the high incidence of neural injury in preterm infants, in whom untimely exposure to ex-uterine factors interrupts neural connectivity. Though the relevance of this period to human neuroscience is apparent, little is known about functional neural networks in human fetal life. Here, we apply graph theoretical analysis to examine human fetal brain connectivity. Utilizing resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from 33 healthy human fetuses, 19 to 39 weeks gestational age (GA), our analyses reveal that the human fetal brain has modular organization and modules overlap functional systems observed postnatally. Age-related differences between younger (GA <31 weeks) and older (GA≥31 weeks) fetuses demonstrate that brain modularity decreases, and connectivity of the posterior cingulate to other brain networks becomes more negative, with advancing GA. By mimicking functional principles observed postnatally, these results support early emerging capacity for information processing in the human fetal brain. Current technical limitations, as well as the potential for fetal fMRI to one day produce major discoveries about fetal origins or antecedents of neural injury or disease are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0094423

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Posterior cingulate connectivity to the rest of the brain weakens with increasing gestational age.

    “Posterior cingulate connectivity to the rest of the brain, for example, weakens with increasing gestational age [64].”

    From Brain structural and functional outcomes in the offspring of women experiencing psychological distress during pregnancy (2024) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Results section reports that posterior cingulate connectivity to other brain modules became more negative with advancing gestational age. Calling this a general weakening of connectivity to the rest of the brain is broader than the finding: it concerns negative connections between modules, while the Discussion also reports connectivity to prefrontal regions in older fetuses only. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomason, M. E., Brown, J. A., Dassanayake, M. T., Shastri, R., Marusak, H. A., Hernandez-Andrade, E., Yeo, L., Mody, S., Berman, S., Hassan, S. S., & Romero, R.
Affiliations
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
Thomason, Moriah E.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-05-01
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
e94423
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030993584
Cited by
130
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Wayne State University
  • W.K. Kellogg Foundation (P3018205)
  • National Institutes of Health (P3018205)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH110793)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R21ES026022)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-2-3342, N01 HD23342, N01-HD-)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
Keywords
fetal brain, functional brain networks, brain modularity, resting-state functional connectivity, posterior cingulate cortex, gestational age, brain maturation, preterm infants, nerve injury, graph theory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Fetus, Gestational Age, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Pregnancy, Young Adult, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review