Cited by 1,055Memory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationNeural dynamics and brain function

What Is a Cognitive Map? Organizing Knowledge for Flexible Behavior

Open access
Behrens, Timothy E.J., Muller, Timothy H., Whittington, James C.R., Mark, Shirley, Baram, Alon B., Stachenfeld, Kimberly L., Kurth-Nelson, Zeb·2018·Neuron

Abstract

It is proposed that a cognitive map encoding the relationships between entities in the world supports flexible behavior, but the majority of the neural evidence for such a system comes from studies of spatial navigation. Recent work describing neuronal parallels between spatial and non-spatial behaviors has rekindled the notion of a systematic organization of knowledge across multiple domains. We review experimental evidence and theoretical frameworks that point to principles unifying these apparently disparate functions. These principles describe how to learn and use abstract, generalizable knowledge and suggest that map-like representations observed in a spatial context may be an instance of general coding mechanisms capable of organizing knowledge of all kinds. We highlight how artificial agents endowed with such principles exhibit flexible behavior and learn map-like representations observed in the brain. Finally, we speculate on how these principles may offer insight into the extreme generalizations, abstractions, and inferences that characterize human cognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.002

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pieces of information which are bound together in a conscious experience are not only scattered in different areas, they are also expressed in different frame of references.

    “More precisely, the pieces of information which are bound together in a conscious experience are not only scattered in different areas, they are also expressed in different frame of references, for instance eye-centered in early visual regions up to more complex cognitive spaces 201 .”

    From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [201]

  • These default mode network activation patterns are evident whenever one is engaged in simulation, whether spontaneous or intentional, focused on one's own past and future or someone else's, or on entirely fictional worlds.

    “These activation patterns are evident whenever we are engaged in simulation, whether that simulation is spontaneous (e.g., mind-wandering; Christoff, Irving, Fox, Spreng, & Andrews-Hanna, 2016) or intentional, is focused on our own past and future, or someone else's (i.e., theory of mind; Buckner & Carroll, 2007), or entirely fictional worlds (Behrens et al., 2018;Hasson, Chen, & Honey, 2015;Mar,”

    From Mental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation. (2020) · cites this paper as Behrens et al., 2018

  • The ERC achieves this outcome by learning the transition structure of an environment and the regularities that occur within it, offering a more generalized code that is optimal for spatial schema instantiation.

    “The ERC achieves this outcome by learning the transition structure of an environment and the regularities that occur within it, offering a more generalized code that is optimal for spatial schema instantiation 157 .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [157]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Behrens, T. E. J., Muller, T. H., Whittington, J. C. R., Mark, S., Baram, A. B., Stachenfeld, K. L., & Kurth-Nelson, Z.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Behrens, Timothy E.J.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
100
Issue
2
Pages
490-509
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2854445389
Cited by
1,055
References
132
Citations by year
2026: 144 · 2025: 179 · 2024: 170 · 2023: 144 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 136 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 2
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (104765/Z/14/Z, WT104765MA)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
cognitive maps, spatial navigation, knowledge organization, behavioral flexibility, abstract generalization, artificial agents, human cognition
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Mental Processes, Models, Neurological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review