Cited by 232Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Does the orbitofrontal cortex signal value?

Open access
Schoenbaum, Geoffrey, Takahashi, Yuji, Liu, Tzu‐Lan, McDannald, Michael A.·2011·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) has long been implicated in associative learning. Early work by Mishkin and Rolls showed that the OFC was critical for rapid changes in learned behavior, a role that was reflected in the encoding of associative information by orbitofrontal neurons. Over the years, new data—particularly neurophysiological data—have increasingly emphasized the OFC in signaling actual value. These signals have been reported to vary according to internal preferences and judgments and to even be completely independent of the sensory qualities of predictive cues, the actual rewards, and the responses required to obtain them. At the same time, increasingly sophisticated behavioral studies have shown that the OFC is often unnecessary for simple value‐based behavior and instead seems critical when information about specific outcomes must be used to guide behavior and learning. Here, we review these data and suggest a theory that potentially reconciles these two ideas, value versus specific outcomes, and bodies of work on the OFC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06210.x

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The vmPFC is monosynaptically connected with cortical structures associated with sensory hedonics and expectancies for specific rewards (orbitofrontal cortex), mentalizing and theory of mind (dorsomedial prefrontal cortex), and goal formation and maintenance (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and frontopolar cortex).

    “It is also monosynaptically connected with cortical structures associated with sensory hedonics and expectancies for specific rewards [15] (OFC), mentalizing and theory of mind [9] (dmPFC), and goal formation and maintenance (dlPFC and frontopolar cortex).”
  • Lesions of the MPFC-OFC system do not result in impairments in responding to cues that are predictive of food rewards, nor do they impair avoidance of a food that has been paired with illness or satiated.

    “Lesions of this system do not result in impairments in responding to cues that are predictive of food rewards, nor do they impair avoidance of a food that has been paired with illness or satiated.”
  • The MPFC-OFC system is critical for reinforcer devaluation, a test in which two cues (Pavlovian devaluation) or two actions (instrumental devaluation) are associated with two foods, one of which is subsequently devalued by satiation or pairing with illness.

    “However, the system is critical for reinforcer devaluation, a test in which two cues (Pavlovian devaluation) or two actions (instrumental devaluation) are associated with two foods, one of which is subsequently devalued by satiation or pairing with illness.”
  • The MPFC-OFC system is critical for representing the subjective value of the specific outcomes associated with certain cues or actions.

    “A large literature on appetitive learning also suggests that the MPFC-OFC system is critical for representing the subjective value of the specific outcomes associated with certain cues or actions [15].”
  • Converging effects in a number of related paradigms have led to the idea that the OFC-vmPFC system represents expectations about specific outcomes, which perhaps provides clues as to the roots of conceptual, prospective thought.

    “Converging effects in a number of related paradigms has led to the idea that the OFC-vmPFC system represents expectations about specific outcomes [15,20], which perhaps provides clues as to the roots of conceptual, prospective thought.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schoenbaum, G., Takahashi, Y., Liu, T., & McDannald, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
Corresponding author
Schoenbaum, Geoffrey
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12
Volume
1239
Issue
1
Pages
87-99
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2129586271
Cited by
232
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 DA999999)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA015718, ZIADA000587)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
orbitofrontal cortex, associative learning, reward prediction, predictive cues, decision-making
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain Mapping, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Learning, Models, Psychological, Neurons, Physiology, Comparative, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reversal Learning, Social Behavior, Social Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review