Cited by 149Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Cognitive processes in the development of TOL performance

Asato, Miya R., Sweeney, John A., Luna, Beatriz·2006·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Components of executive function continue to develop through adolescence. There is limited knowledge of how these cognitive components impact complex cognitive function requiring their integration. This study examines the development of response planning, a complex cognitive function, and the contributions of selected cognitive processes, including speed of processing, response inhibition, and working memory to its development. We tested 100 healthy 8-30 year old individuals with a computerized version to the Tower of London (TOL) task and cognitive oculomotor tests including the visually guided saccade, oculomotor delayed response, and antisaccade tasks. Speed of processing, response inhibition, working memory, and TOL performance all demonstrated maturation in adolescence. While all processes were correlated with the development of TOL performance, antisaccade performance showed the strongest association indicating an important role for response inhibition in planning. These results indicate that the development of converging cognitive processes in adolescence, including response inhibition and working memory, support response planning and may serve as a model for the development of performance in other complex problem solving tasks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.010

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shorter latencies to first move on the Tower of London indicate greater impulsivity.

    “Thus, in the current study, shorter latencies to first move indicate greater impulsivity.”

    From A dual systems model of adolescent risk‐taking (2010) · cites this paper as Asato, Sweeney, & Luna, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asato, M. R., Sweeney, J. A., & Luna, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Asato, Miya R.
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
44
Issue
12
Pages
2259-2269
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002596702
Cited by
149
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH1895, K01MH001727, MH-01727)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
Tower of London task, response planning, executive function, cognitive development, adolescence, processing speed, response inhibition, working memory, antisaccades, visually guided saccades, cognitive maturation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Attention, Child, Cognition, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review