Cited by 61Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional developmental changes underlying response inhibition and error-detection processes

Open access

Abstract

This study examined the developmental trajectories associated with response inhibition and error processing as exemplar executive processes. We present fMRI data showing developmental changes to the functional networks underlying response inhibition and error-monitoring, comparing activation between adults and young adolescents performing the sustained attention to response task (SART). During successful inhibitions, we observed greater activation for the young adolescents than for the adults, in a widely distributed network including frontal, parietal and medial regions. When inhibition failed, however, adults showed increased activation compared to young adolescents in a number of regions, including bilateral parahippocampal gyrus, left and right lingual gyri, the right insula, and cerebellar regions. These differences largely remained even when the two groups were matched for performance, suggesting that performance differences are unlikely to be the driving factor behind these developmental differences. Instead, the neurodevelopmental trajectory of these important executive functions may reveal the basis for the immature executive functioning of the young adolescent.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.018

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Whereas the behavioral and neuroimaging literatures generally indicate a relationship between increases in cognitive control and engagement of the lPFC from adolescence into adulthood, the relationship between age, behavior, and neural engagement from childhood to adolescence is not as consistent.

    “Whereas the behavioral and neuroimaging literatures generally indicate a relationship between increases in cognitive control and engagement of the lPFC from adolescence into adulthood, the relationship between age, behavior, and neural engagement from childhood to adolescence is not as consistent (Alahyane et al., 2014, Booth et al., 2003, Braet et al., 2009, Casey et al., 1997, Durston et al., 20”

    From The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation (2016) · cites this paper as Braet et al., 2009

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Braet, W., Johnson, K. A., Tobin, C. T., Acheson, R., Bellgrove, M. A., Robertson, I. H., & Garavan, H.
Affiliations
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Braet, Wouter
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
47
Issue
14
Pages
3143-3151
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998724883
Cited by
61
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Science Foundation Ireland
  • Irish Health Research Board
  • Irish Higher Education Authority's Programme
  • Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Howard Florey Centenary Fellowship
  • FWO Research Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
response inhibition, error monitoring, executive function, brain development, adolescents, Sustained Attention to Response Task, functional brain networks, inhibitory control, error processing, cerebellum, parahippocampal gyrus, insula
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aging, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Discrimination, Psychological, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Reaction Time, Statistics as Topic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review