Cited by 38Neural dynamics and brain functionTactile and Sensory InteractionsMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Neocortical dynamics during whisker-based sensory discrimination in head-restrained mice

Open access
Helmchen, Fritjof, Gilad, Ariel, Chen, Jerry L.·2018·Neuroscience

Abstract

A fundamental task frequently encountered by brains is to rapidly and reliably discriminate between sensory stimuli of the same modality, be it distinct auditory sounds, odors, visual patterns, or tactile textures. A key mammalian brain structure involved in discrimination behavior is the neocortex. Sensory processing not only involves the respective primary sensory area, which is crucial for perceptual detection, but additionally relies on cortico-cortical communication among several regions including higher-order sensory areas as well as frontal cortical areas. It remains elusive how these regions exchange information to process neural representations of distinct stimuli to bring about a decision and initiate appropriate behavioral responses. Likewise, it is poorly understood how these neural computations are conjured during task learning. In this review, we discuss recent studies investigating cortical dynamics during discrimination behaviors that utilize head-fixed behavioral tasks in combination with in vivo electrophysiology, two-photon calcium imaging, and cell-type-specific targeting. We particularly focus on information flow in distinct cortico-cortical pathways when mice use their whiskers to discriminate between different objects or different locations. Within the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices (S1 and S2, respectively) as well as vibrissae motor cortex (M1), intermingled functional representations of touch, whisking, and licking were found, which partially re-organized during discrimination learning. These findings provide first glimpses of cortico-cortical communication but emphasize that for understanding the complete process of discrimination it will be crucial to elucidate the details of how neural processing is coordinated across brain-wide neuronal networks including the S1-S2-M1 triangle and cortical areas beyond.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.09.003

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Serial transformation of sensory inputs along bottom-up hierarchical pathways has been observed in rodents engaged in whisker-discrimination tasks, with increasingly stronger association with perceptual choice in S2 and premotor areas rather than wS1.

    “Serial transformation of sensory inputs along bottom–up hierarchical pathways has been observed in rodents engaged in whisker-discrimination tasks (8, 9) with an increasingly stronger association with perceptual choice in S2 (10, 11) and premotor areas (12–14) rather than whisker-related wS1 (9).”

    From Neural correlates of perceptual decision-making in the primary somatosensory cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [11]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The primary sensory cortex not only retains relatively weak and sparse choice-related activity but also, in this naturalistic behavioral task, directly participates in categorical coding of an all-or-none decision variable into which the majority of neural populations are recruited.

    “These observations indicate that the primary sensory cortex not only retains relatively weak and sparse choice-related activity, as it was shown previously (10, 11, 19–25), but also, in our naturalistic behavioral task, directly participates in a categorical coding of all-or-none DV into which the majority of neural populations are recruited.”

    From Neural correlates of perceptual decision-making in the primary somatosensory cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [11]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sensory S1 and S2 cortices have strongly lateralized ipsilateral outputs and are densely and reciprocally interconnected, forming a top-down feedback loop that exhibits choice-related activity.

    “In contrast, sensory S1 and S2 cortices have strongly lateralized ipsilateral outputs (43, 59) and are densely and reciprocally interconnected (60) forming a top–down feedback loop that exhibits choice-related activity (10, 11, 22–25).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Grienberger C Konnerth A 2012 Imaging calcium in neurons Neuron 73 862 885 22405199
  2. Xu NL Harnett MT Williams SR Huber D O'Connor DH Svoboda K Magee JC 2012 Nonlinear dendritic integration of sensory and motor input during an active sensing task Nature 492 247 251 23143335

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Helmchen, F., Gilad, A., & Chen, J. L.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Helmchen, Fritjof
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
368
Pages
57-69
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2756098292
Cited by
38
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • University of Zurich (541541808)
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (310030-127091, 31003A_149858)
  • US BRAIN Initiative (1U01NS090475-01)
  • US National Science Foundation, International Research Fellowship Program (1158914)
  • ERC
  • EMBO
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
sensory discrimination, primary somatosensory cortex, secondary somatosensory cortex, object discrimination, spatial discrimination, cortical reorganization, discrimination learning, neural information flow
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Discrimination, Psychological, Head, Nerve Net, Restraint, Physical, Somatosensory Cortex, Vibrissae, Neocortex, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review