Cited by 238Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

From ventral-medial to dorsal-lateral striatum: neural correlates of reward-guided decision-making

Open access
Burton, Amanda C., Nakamura, Kae, Roesch, Matthew R.·2015·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

The striatum is critical for reward-guided and habitual behavior. Anatomical and interference studies suggest a functional heterogeneity within striatum. Medial regions, such as nucleus accumbens core and dorsal medial striatum play roles in goal-directed behavior, while dorsal lateral striatum is critical for control of habitual action. Subdivisions of striatum are topographically connected with different cortical and subcortical structures forming channels that carry information related to limbic, associative, and sensorimotor functions. Here, we describe data showing that as one progresses from ventral-medial to dorsal-lateral striatum, there is a shift from more prominent value encoding to activity more closely related to associative and motor aspects of decision-making. In addition, we will describe data suggesting that striatal circuits work in parallel to control behavior and that regions within striatum can compensate for each other when functions are disrupted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2014.05.003

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burton, A. C., Nakamura, K., & Roesch, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Kansai Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Roesch, Matthew R.
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
117
Pages
51-59
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076706946
Cited by
238
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIDA
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
striatum, nucleus accumbens core, dorsomedial striatum, value encoding, goal-directed behavior, habitual behavior, striatal circuits, functional compensation
MeSH terms
Animals, Decision Making, Humans, Macaca mulatta, Nucleus Accumbens, Psychomotor Performance, Reward, Neostriatum, Rats, Ventral Striatum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review