Cited by 250Impact of Technology on AdolescentsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesPersonality Traits and Psychology

Facebook and self-perception: Individual susceptibility to negative social comparison on Facebook

de Vries, Dian A., Kühne, Rinaldo·2015·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.029

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Vries, D. A., & Kühne, R.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
86
Pages
217-221
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W815467609
Cited by
250
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9
FWCI
60.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
Facebook use, social network sites, self-perception, social comparison theory, happiness, emerging adults, physical attractiveness, social information processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review