Cited by 166Impact of Technology on AdolescentsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesMedia and Digital Communication

Social comparison on Facebook: Its antecedents and psychological outcomes

Jang, Kyungeun, Park, Namkee, Song, Hayeon·2016·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.082

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jang, K., Park, N., & Song, H.
Affiliations
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Gachon University (KR)
Corresponding author
Park, Namkee
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
62
Pages
147-154
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2329846357
Cited by
166
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7
FWCI
32.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
social comparison, Facebook use, social comparison orientation, perceived social support, mental health, self-esteem, impression management, university students, social media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review