Cited by 60Stress Responses and CortisolNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Individual differences in cortisol levels and performance on a test of executive function in men and women

McCormick, C.M., Lewis, E., Somley, B., Kahan, T.A.·2007·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Despite evidence for a high concentration of corticosteroid receptors in prefrontal cortex, little research has examined the relationship between cortisol and prefrontal cortical function other than working memory. We investigated the association between salivary cortisol levels and performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) of executive function and on a test of mental rotation (to test specificity of the relationship between cortisol and cognitive performance) in men and women (n=116, ages 17-22). Higher cortisol levels at the beginning of the test session were associated with more errors in women on the WCST and fewer errors in men. However, men's cortisol levels were lower than women's at this point in time. Cortisol levels were not associated with mental rotation scores. Our results suggest that individual differences in cortisol levels among participants upon arrival to a test situation influence performance on a task involving the prefrontal cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.01.020

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elevated stress-related hormones (cortisol) have been linked to poor cognitive flexibility performance in typically developing adults.

    “Elevations in stress related hormones (i.e. cortisol) have been associated with poor performance on measures of cognitive flexibility in typically developing adults [54].”

    From The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism (2009) · cites this paper as [54]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCormick, C. M., Lewis, E., Somley, B., & Kahan, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Brock University (CA)
  • Bates College (US)
Corresponding author
McCormick, C.M.
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
87-94
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018816373
Cited by
60
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
salivary cortisol, executive function, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, mental rotation, prefrontal cortex, sex differences, individual differences, cognitive performance, corticosteroid receptors, adolescents and young adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Imagination, Individuality, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Saliva, Sex Characteristics, Space Perception, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review