Cited by 980Bioenergy crop production and managementBioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentBiofuel production and bioconversion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 147 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The effect of bioenergy expansion: Food, energy, and environment

Open access
Popp, J., Lakner, Z., Harangi-Rákos, M., Fári, M.·2014·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Abstract

The increasing prices and environmental impacts of fossil fuels have made the production of biofuels to reach unprecedented volumes over the last 15 years. Given the increasing land requirement for biofuel production, the assessment of the impacts that extensive biofuel production may cause to food supply and to the environment has considerable importance. Agriculture faces some major inter-connected challenges in delivering food security at a time of increasing pressures from population growth, changing consumption patterns and dietary preferences, and post-harvest losses. At the same time, there are growing opportunities and demands for the use of biomass to provide additional renewables, energy for heat, power and fuel, pharmaceuticals and green chemical feedstocks. Biomass from cellulosic bioenergy crops is expected to play a substantial role in future energy systems. However, the worldwide potential of bioenergy is limited, because all land is multi-functional and land is also needed for food, feed, timber, and fiber production, and for nature conservation and climate protection. Furthermore, the potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation remains unclear due to large uncertainties about future agricultural yield improvements and land availability for biomass plantations. Large-scale cultivation of dedicated biomass is likely to affect bioenergy potentials, global food prices and water scarcity. Therefore, integrated policies for energy, land use and water management are needed. As biomass contains all the elements found in fossil resources, albeit in different combinations, therefore present and developing technologies can lead to a future based on renewable, sustainable and low carbon economies. This article presents [1] risks to food and energy security [2] estimates of bioenergy potential with regard to biofuel production, and [3] the challenges of the environmental impact.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review assesses global bioenergy expansion and its implications for food, energy, and environment, concluding that bioenergy has large but limited potential and that integrated land, water, and energy policies are needed. It finds that sustainable bioenergy potential is much lower than technical estimates and that indirect land-use change, food prices, and water scarcity are key risks.

Key findings

  • Global technical bioenergy potential estimates span less than 50 to 1500 EJ/year in 2050; sustainability-constrained scenarios indicate 200–500 EJ/year, while some analyses suggest a biophysical upper limit of about 250 EJ/year in 2050.
  • Global cropland used for biofuels is about 2.5% (40 million gross hectares), falling to 1.5% net when co-products substitute for grains and oilseeds; by 2050 land for biofuel production would need to rise to around 100 million ha (about 6% of arable land). Global food production must increase by 60% by 2050, with crop yield growth slowing to 0.8% per year (2005/2007–2050) versus 1.7% per year (1961–2007).
  • Land-use change contributes about 15% of global GHG emissions; bioenergy-related land-use change represents only around 1% of total land-use-change emissions. Indirect land-use change emissions are reported at 30 to more than 100% of fossil fuel emissions, and indirect emissions are in the order of 10–40% of emissions from substituted fossil fuels. Forest conservation reduces bioenergy supply from about 100 EJ in 2055 to 70 EJ and from about 300 EJ in 2095 to 270 EJ.
  • One metric tonne of DDGS can replace on average 1.22 metric tonnes of feed consisting of corn and soybean meal in the United States; accounting for co-products reduces the land required for feedstock cultivation to 1.5% of the global crop area (net land requirement).

Methods

  • The paper conducts a meta-analysis contrasting and combining results from various studies, biomass supply scenarios, and global models linked to land, water, energy use, and climate change in terms of food-, energy-, and environmental security.
  • Search terms included food-, energy- and environmental security, food demand, yield trends, renewable energy, biomass, biofuels, by-products for livestock feeding from biofuel production, land-use change, biofuels and the environment, sustainability requirements, and climate change mitigation; references covered 2001 to 2013, with supplemental bibliography searches.
  • Calculations were made for the land required for cultivation of feedstocks adding by-products substituted for grains and oilseeds; the EU policy objective of 20% GHG emission reductions using 20% renewables by 2020 is also presented.

Limitations

  • The paper states that results are potentially biased because studies might differ in their focus on potential or realized effects, their use of different baselines for comparisons, and other background conditions; there is also a lack of available publications related to the feed value of increasing biofuels by-products.
  • The paper states that precise quantification of GHG savings for specific systems is often hampered by lack of reliable data, different methods of quantification lead to variation in estimates, and indirect effects are uncertain and vary in time with no fixed indirect emission factor.
  • Evident from the text: as a review/meta-analysis, findings depend on assumptions and scenarios in cited studies, and the wide ranges reported (e.g., less than 50 to 1500 EJ/year) limit precision; no new primary experimental data are presented.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.056

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 147 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 135 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 136
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 153
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
222 of 222
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A quarter of all agricultural land has already suffered degradation.

    “Meanwhile a quarter of all agricultural land has already suffered degradation, and there is a deepening awareness of the long term consequences of a loss of biodiversity with the prospect of climate change.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Land is multi-functional and is also needed for food, feed, timber, and fiber production, and for nature conservation and climate protection.

    “However, the worldwide potential of bioenergy is limited, because all land is multi-functional and land is also needed for food, feed, timber, and fiber production, and for nature conservation and climate protection.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Biomass contains all the elements found in fossil resources, albeit in different combinations.

    “As biomass contains all the elements found in fossil resources, albeit in different combinations, therefore present and developing technologies can lead to a future based on renewable, sustainable and low carbon economies.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Biomass could sustainably contribute between a quarter and a third of the future global energy mix.

    “It is reasonable to assume that biomass could sustainably contribute between a quarter and a third of the future global energy mix.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    No additional land use effect regarding productive land occurs when unproductive land is converted to bioenergy feedstock production.

    “no additional land use effect regarding productive land is assumed to occur here”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Global availability of cellulosic biomass without any trade restrictions is assumed.

    “assumption on global availability of cellulosic biomass without any trade restrictions may overestimate calculated bioenergy potentials”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    All suitable land for agricultural production is made available for land expansion.

    “if all suitable land for agricultural production was made available for land expansion”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Co-emissions from deforestation, biodiversity issues, and impacts on food and water security are not considered.

    “Without considering co-emissions from deforestation, biodiversity issues, and impacts on food and water security”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    No indirect LUC effects are considered.

    “if no indirect LUC effects are considered”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Bioenergy systems replace fossil-based energy and bioenergy production emissions, including those arising due to land use change, are kept low.

    “if they replace fossil-based energy and if the bioenergy production emissionsincluding those arising due to land use changeare kept low”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    DDGS has been one of the most economically competitive sources of energy and proteins available on the world feed market over the past several years.

    “Over the past several years, DDGS has been one of the most economically competitive sources of energy and proteins available on the world feed market.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Only the starch portion of the corn kernel is converted to ethanol, while the protein, fat, fiber and other components are concentrated and passed through the process to the DDGS.

    “Only the starch portion of the corn kernel is converted to ethanol, while the protein, fat, fiber and other components are concentrated and passed through the process to the DDGS.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is limited demand for glycerin for food, beverage, personal care and oral products, as well as pharmaceutical and other industrial uses.

    “There is a limited demand for glycerin, the by-product of biodiesel production for a number of food, beverage, personal care and oral products, as well as pharmaceutical and other industrial uses.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Research at different countries has found that glycerin can be used effectively in livestock rations to replace fossil-based glycerin.

    “To deal with that potential problem and to create additional markets for the by-product of biodiesel, research at different countries has found that glycerin can be used effectively in livestock rations to replace fossil-based glycerin.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Biofuel production processes give rise to co-products which are largely suitable as animal feed.

    “The biofuel production processes give rise to co-products which are largely suitable as animal feed.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the cases of grains and oilseeds, DDGS, CGF/CGM and oil cakes (mainly rapeseed and soybean cake/meal) substitute grain and soybean as feed.

    “In the cases of grains and oilseeds, DDGS, CGF/CGM and oil cakes (mainly rapeseed and soybean cake/meal) substitute grain and soybean as feed.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Increased population density, coupled with changes in dietary habits in developing countries towards high quality food, is projected to increase demand for food production by 60% by 2050.

    “The increased population density, coupled with changes in dietary habits in developing countries towards high quality food is projected to increase demand for food production by 60% by 2050.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Recent estimates on the potential global ligno-cellulosic bioenergy supply range from less than 100 EJ/year to 1500 EJ/year for 2050.

    “Recent estimates on the potential global ligno-cellulosic bioenergy supply range from less than 100 EJ/yearto 1500 EJ yearfor 2050.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In other energy scenarios, bioenergy use is projected to be in the order of 150-400 EJ in the year 2100.

    “In other energy scenarios, bioenergy use is projected to be in the order of 150-400 EJ in the year 2100.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Globally, advanced biofuels capacity is expected to expand only slowly, though the first commercial-scale plants in the United States and Europe were recently commissioned.

    “Globally, advanced biofuels capacity is expected to expand only slowly, though the first commercial-scale plants in the United States and Europe were recently commissioned.”
20 of 20

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Two totals are given for 2012 fuel ethanol production

    Minor

    The text reports 86 billion liters of global fuel ethanol production in 2012, while Fig. 4 gives a total of 85 billion liters for the same year.

  • Conflicting net land requirements for fuel ethanol

    Minor

    The net area needed for fuel ethanol is stated as 21 million hectares, but the preceding calculation says it declines to 15 million hectares after accounting for co-products.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 73 references

2 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. IPPC. Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (SRREN). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
  2. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends findings of the condition and trends working group. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N, editors. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2005. pp. 77–122.
  3. Fargione, 2008, Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt, Science, 319, 1235, 10.1126/science.1152747 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Fritsche U. Bioenergy GHG emission balances including direct and indirect land use change effects. In: presented at the IEA workshop “Sustainability certification of biofuels and bioenergy”, 29 January 2009, Brussels.
  5. EEA, EU. Bioenergy potential from a resource-efficiency perspective. European Environment Agency. EEA Report No 6/2013; 2013. 60 pp. ISBN 978-92-9213-397-9 doi:10.2800/92247. · DOI
  6. FAO. Global Agriculture Towards 2050. In: Paper Prepared by the High-Level Expert Forum for the Conference How to Feed the World by 2050. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization; 2009.
  7. Haberl, 2007, Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in Earth׳s terrestrial ecosystems, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 104, 12942, 10.1073/pnas.0704243104 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Krausmann, 2013, Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 110, 10324, 10.1073/pnas.1211349110 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Yifei, 2012, Could China׳s gutter oil be used to save the environment, Int Bus Times
  10. Licht FO. World ethanol and biofuel Report (vol. 10, no. 9). London: Agra Informa; 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 980

Metadata

Authors
Popp, J., Lakner, Z., Harangi-Rákos, M., & Fári, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Debrecen (HU)
  • Corvinus University of Budapest (HU)
Corresponding author
Popp, J.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
32
Pages
559-578
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988730360
Cited by
967
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 14
FWCI
93.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
biofuels, land use competition, food security, energy security, biomass, climate change mitigation, water scarcity, global food prices, environmental impacts of bioenergy, renewable energy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review