Cited by 75Disability Education and EmploymentSchizophrenia research and treatmentEmployment and Welfare Studies

The efficacy of supported employment for middle-aged and older people with schizophrenia

Open access
Twamley, Elizabeth W., Vella, Lea, Burton, Cynthia Z., Becker, Deborah R., Bell, Morris D., Jeste, Dilip V.·2012·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Objective Supported employment is the evidence-based treatment of choice for assisting individuals with severe mental illness to achieve competitive employment, but few supported employment programs specifically target older clients with psychiatric illness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of supported employment for middle-aged or older people with schizophrenia.Method Participants included 58 outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder aged 45 or older who were recruited from a community mental health clinic. Participants were randomly assigned to receive Individual Placement and Support (IPS; the manualized version of supported employment) or conventional vocational rehabilitation (CVR) for one year, and completed assessments at baseline, six months, and twelve months.Results IPS was superior to CVR on nearly all work outcome measures, including attainment of competitive employment, weeks worked, and wages earned. Fifty-seven percent of IPS participants worked competitively, compared with 29% of CVR participants; 70% of IPS participants obtained any paid work, compared with 36% of CVR participants. Within the IPS group, better baseline functional capacity (as measured by the UCSD Performance Based Skills Assessment) and more recent employment were modestly associated with better work outcomes.Conclusions Middle-aged and older adults with schizophrenia are good candidates for supported employment services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2011.11.036

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RCTs have shown significant improvement with other manualized psychosocial interventions in older patients with schizophrenia, such as supported employment with or without compensatory cognitive training, to help them obtain and retain paid jobs.

    “Randomized controlled trials have also shown significant improvement with other manualized psychosocial interventions in older patients with schizophrenia, such as supported employment without and with compensatory cognitive training to help them obtain and retain paid jobs282, 283.”
  • Previous research reported that for populations with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, IPS proved more effective than treatment as usual as measured by subjects finding competitive employment (57% vs. 29%).

    “Previous research reported that for populations with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, IPS proved more effective than TAU as measured by subjects finding competitive employment (57% vs. 29%)[44].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Reitan RM Wolfson D The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: theory and clinical interpretation 1993 second ed. Neuropsychology Press Arizona
  2. Wechsler D Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Third Edition (WAIS-III) 1997a The Psychological Corporation Texas
  3. Wechsler D Wechsler Memory Scale – Third Edition (WMS-III) 1997b The Psychological Corporation Texas

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Twamley, E. W., Vella, L., Burton, C. Z., Becker, D. R., Bell, M. D., & Jeste, D. V.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Twamley, Elizabeth W.
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
135
Issue
1-3
Pages
100-104
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049294452
Cited by
75
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California, San Diego
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH066011, R01MH080150, MH066011)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
supported employment, Individual Placement and Support
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Employment, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotic Disorders, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Severity of Illness Index, Employment, Supported, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Evidence-Based Medicine, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review