Cited by 85Disability Education and EmploymentSchizophrenia research and treatmentEmployment and Welfare Studies

Client Predictors of Employment Outcomes in High-Fidelity Supported Employment: A Regression Analysis

Campbell, Kikuko, Bond, Gary R., Drake, Robert E., McHugo, Gregory J., Xie, Haiyi·2010·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

Research on vocational rehabilitation for clients with severe mental illness over the past 2 decades has yielded inconsistent findings regarding client factors statistically related to employment. The present study aimed to elucidate the relationship between baseline client characteristics and competitive employment outcomes-job acquisition and total weeks worked during an 18-month follow-up-in Individual Placement and Support (IPS). Data from 4 recent randomized controlled trials of IPS were aggregated for within-group regression analyses. In the IPS sample (N = 307), work history was the only significant predictor for job acquisition, but receiving Supplemental Security Income-with or without Social Security Disability Insurance-was associated with fewer total weeks worked (2.0%-2.8% of the variance). In the comparison sample (N = 374), clients with a diagnosis of mood disorder or with less severe thought disorder symptoms were more likely to obtain competitive employment. The findings confirm that clients with severe mental illness interested in competitive work best benefit from high-fidelity supported employment regardless of their work history and sociodemographic and clinical background, and highlight the needs for changes in federal policies for disability income support and insurance regulations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0b013e3181ea1e53

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campbell, K., Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., McHugo, G. J., & Xie, H.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Campbell, Kikuko
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2010-08
Volume
198
Issue
8
Pages
556-563
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017687902
Cited by
85
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
14.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k02mh000839-10, 5r18mh047650-03, 5k02mh000842-10)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (H133G990155)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-00842, MH-56147, MH-00839, MH 51346, MH-47650, R24MH056147)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
Individual Placement and Support, supported employment, severe mental illness, vocational rehabilitation, competitive employment, job acquisition, work history, Supplemental Security Income, Social Security Disability Insurance, mood disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Competitive Behavior, Disability Evaluation, Employment, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Income, Probability, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Public Policy, Regression Analysis, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Severity of Illness Index, Social Security, United States, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Employment, Supported, Insurance, Disability, Intention to Treat Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review