The DOI matches its Crossref record; 139 of the 140 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 89 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future?
Open accessAbstract
The effects of microplastics (MP) on aquatic organisms are currently the subject of intense research. Here, we provide a critical perspective on published studies of MP ingestion by aquatic biota. We summarize the available research on MP presence, behaviour and effects on aquatic organisms monitored in the field and on laboratory studies of the ecotoxicological consequences of MP ingestion. We consider MP polymer type, shape, size as well as group of organisms studied and type of effect reported. Specifically, we evaluate whether or not the available laboratory studies of MP are representative of the types of MPs found in the environment and whether or not they have reported on relevant groups or organisms. Analysis of the available data revealed that 1) despite their widespread detection in field-based studies, polypropylene, polyester and polyamide particles were under-represented in laboratory studies; 2) fibres and fragments (800-1600 μm) are the most common form of MPs reported in animals collected from the field; 3) to date, most studies have been conducted on fish; knowledge is needed about the effects of MPs on other groups of organisms, especially invertebrates. Furthermore, there are significant mismatches between the types of MP most commonly found in the environment or reported in field studies and those used in laboratory experiments. Finally, there is an overarching need to understand the mechanism of action and ecotoxicological effects of environmentally relevant concentrations of MPs on aquatic organism health.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review surveys 157 articles and 612 studies on microplastics in aquatic organisms, finding research skewed toward fish and small crustaceans, PE/PS polymers, and laboratory concentrations often higher than environmental levels. It highlights mismatches between field-detected microplastic shapes, sizes, and polymers and those used in laboratory ecotoxicology, and calls for more environmentally relevant, freshwater, and mechanism-focused work.
Key findings
- Across field and laboratory studies, the most commonly reported microplastics were PE (23%) and PS (22%), followed by PP (12%) and PES (9%); fish were the most studied organism group (44%), followed by crustacea (21% combined), molluscs (14%), and annelid worms (6%).
- Field and laboratory studies were roughly balanced (48% field, 52% laboratory), but fish dominated field studies (23% of all studies) while small crustaceans dominated laboratory studies (17%); 24% of field studies did not report the typology of microplastics present in biota.
- Laboratory studies most often used spherical microplastics (17%) and particles <50 μm (75 of 169 laboratory studies where size was reported), whereas field-collected organisms most often contained fibres (23%) and fragments (21%), with 800–1600 μm and 400–800 μm each reported in 12% of field studies.
- Among 130 studies reporting ecotoxicological effects, crustaceans were most studied (45%), followed by fish (21%), molluscs (18%), annelid worms (7%), echinoderms (7%), and rotifers (2%); ecotoxicological studies used marine organisms 77% of the time versus freshwater organisms 23%.
Methods
- A bibliographic survey was conducted on November 22, 2017 using the Thompson Reuters ISI Web of Science database with the keyword “microplastic*”; 1,637 candidate publications were identified and 157 were retained for analysis.
- Retained studies were summarized by microplastic type, shape, size range, organism group, and ecotoxicological effect; a “study” was defined as an interaction of organism group, MP type, MP shape, and MP size, yielding 612 studies from the 157 articles.
- The review tabulated and summarized published field and laboratory studies; no attempt was made to separate direct ecotoxicological effects from organism responses associated with starvation following MP ingestion.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: laboratory studies often use unrealistically high MP concentrations; 24% of field studies did not report MP typology; freshwater organisms are under-studied; there is a possible publication bias against negative results; and analytical challenges limit understanding of whether MPs adsorb contaminants once inside organisms.
- Stated in the paper: no attempt was made to separate direct ecotoxicological effects from starvation-related responses, and the review did not include plants or microbes.
- Evident from the text: the review relies on a single database and a single search date, and its findings depend on the author-defined classification criteria and the available published literature.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 89 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our search identified 157 published, peer-reviewed articles which documented a total of 612 studies (listed in supplementary information).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 2. Methodological approach
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were relatively few studies of PE in vertebrates other than fish.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fish are the most studied organism group in the field (23% of all studies)”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The surveyed publications identified an equivalent number of studies conducted in the field (48%) and laboratory (52%) (Fig. 3A).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most common types of MPs reported in biota collected during field sampling include PE (17%), PP (14%), PES (13%), PA (10%) and PS MPs (9%) (Fig. S1).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the laboratory, smaller particles (b50 μm) were used most commonly (75 / 169 laboratory studies where MP size was reported) (Fig. S2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To date, ecotoxicological studies of MPs have been conducted predominantly using marine (77%) as opposed to freshwater (23%) organisms (Fig. 3B).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.1. Organism groups used in ecotoxicological studies with MPs
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“whereas small crustaceans are the group most studied in the laboratory (17% of all studies) (Fig. 3A).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, a sizeable fraction of the field studies (24%) did not report the typology of MPs present in the biota (Fig. S1).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The size range 800-1600 μm, the most commonly reported from field samples of biota represents a very small fraction of the sizes used in the laboratory (Fig. S2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 20
- The quote only partly states this claim. 4
- It may state two separate claims as one. 48
- Borderline: one of the tests for a substantial claim is unclear. 1
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 1637 candidate publications were identified.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 2. Methodological approach
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fish were the most commonly studied group of organisms (44%), followed by crustacea (21% for large and small crustacea combined), molluscs (14%) and annelid worms (6%) (Fig. 2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 1637 candidate publications, 157 were retained for further analysis.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 2. Methodological approach
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The presence of PE was reported less commonly in other groups of organisms, with 12 studies on molluscs, seven on small crustaceans and four on annelids (Fig. 2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The types of MPs most commonly reported across field and laboratory studies include PE (23%) and PS (22%), followed by PP (12%) and PES (9%) (Fig. 1).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effects of PS MPs have been reported in studies of fish (n = 17) and small crustaceans (n = 19) (Fig. 2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Polyethylene was the most common type of MP studied in fish, it was reported in 34 studies, or 12% of the total number of studies identified.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In fact, only 8% of the laboratory studies have been performed with PP MPs whereas PS and PE MPs were used in 40% and 33% of the studies respectively (Fig. S1).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The MP size used or reported in published studies also varies and is related to MP shape (Fig. S2), with almost every shape having been reported across all size ranges (Fig. S2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The size ranges 800-1600 μm (12%) and 400-800 μm (12%) were the most commonly reported in animals collected from the field, followed by 200-400 μm (11%) (Fig. S2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fibres and fragments were reported in 23% and 21% of studies, respectively, followed by spheres (11%), film (8%) and pellets (4%) (Fig. S2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, in laboratory studies, spherical MPs have been the most commonly used shape (17%) followed by fibres, fragments and unspecified particles (all 3%) (Fig. S2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While field studies generally reflect reported plastic production rates, these polymers were not studied with similar frequency in laboratory assays (Fig. S1).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the reports of MPs in marine organisms, fish are the most commonly studied group (25%), followed by molluscs (15%), small crustacea (11%), large crustacea (8%) annelid worms (6%), mammals and echinoderms (both 3%), birds and cnidaria (both 2%), porifera, reptiles and rotifers (all b 1%) (Fig. 3B).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.1. Organism groups used in ecotoxicological studies with MPs
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Multiple freshwater studies only exist for fish (13% overall, 56% of the freshwater studies) and small crustacea (8% overall, 35% of the freshwater studies).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.1. Organism groups used in ecotoxicological studies with MPs
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Other commonly studied species include the freshwater fish Danio rerio (7%) (Khan et al., 2015;Lu et al., 2016;Chen et al., 2017aChen et al., , 2017b;;Sleight et al., 2017;Veneman et al., 2017;Lei et al., 2018)”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.1. Organism groups used in ecotoxicological studies with MPs
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Crustaceans were the most commonly studied taxonomic group (45%), followed by fish (21%), molluscs (18%), annelid worms (7%), echinoderms (7%) and rotifers (2%).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Overall, documented effects of MPs on aquatic organisms include reduction of feeding activity (Besseling et al., 2013;de Sá et al., 2015), oxidative stress (Della Torre et al., 2014), genotoxicity (Della Torre et al., 2014), neurotoxicity (Oliveira et al., 2012(Oliveira et al., , 2013;;Luis et al., 2015;Ribeiro et al., 2017), growth delay (Della Torre et al., 2014;Au et al., 2015;Redondo-Hasselerh”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Slightly more than half the studies (54%) were conducted using PE MPs.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.3. Interactive ecotoxicological effects of MPs with other contaminants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most studies had been performed on fish (63%), with some studies of molluscs (19%), crustacea (14%) and annelid worms (5%).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.3. Interactive ecotoxicological effects of MPs with other contaminants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Polystyrene (29%), PVC (19%) and PP (4%) MPs were also reported.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.3. Interactive ecotoxicological effects of MPs with other contaminants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies examined the combined effects of MPs with legacy POPs (64%), endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs; 17%), metals (10%), antibiotics (7%) and herbicides (2%).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.3. Interactive ecotoxicological effects of MPs with other contaminants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the effects of MPs on freshwater organisms are much less well known.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 4. Conclusions and future perspectives
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“since these particles, namely PP, are manufactured in large scale and detected in aquatic organisms in the higher quantities than PS”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 4. Conclusions and future perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The occurrence and accumulation of MPs in the aquatic environment is nowadays an undeniable fact.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 4. Conclusions and future perspectives
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is also undeniable that a large number of organisms are exposed to these particles and that this exposure may cause a variety of effects and threaten individuals of many different species, the ecosystems they live in and, ultimately, humans.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 4. Conclusions and future perspectives
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The potential deleterious effects of MPs on aquatic biota have been recognized by the scientific community as demonstrated by the increasing number of studies in the last years focussing primarily on marine biota.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 4. Conclusions and future perspectives
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, results suggest a knowledge gap on the effects of PE MPs on other organisms beyond fish and PS MPs on all groups of organisms except fish and small crustaceans.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 4. Conclusions and future perspectives
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Ingestion of PE by fish is both widespread and crosses habitat preferences.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lusher et al. (2013) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mechanisms of MP action on organism health still poorly understood”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Taxonomic groups in which PS MPs were detected include the marine copepods Acartia spp.and Eurytemora affinis (Setälä et al., 2014), large crustaceans such as the estuarine mysid Neomysis integer (Setälä et al., 2014) and the crab Uca rapax (Brennecke et al., 2015).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No attempt was made to separate direct ecotoxicological effects from e.g.organism responses associated with starvation following MP ingestion.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 2. Methodological approach
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Sections 3.2.1-3.2.3 where MPs effects are described, only studies which report MP effects on organisms were considered.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 2. Methodological approach
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“For example, Lusher et al. (2013) showed that over one third of fish examined in their study had ingested MPs, with pelagic and benthic fish displaying similar gut contents, suggesting either a lack of selectivity or widespread presence of PE in both the water column and sediments.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lusher et al. (2013) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most lab studies are conducted at unrealistically high MP concentrations”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearBorderline substantial claim. It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“The widespread distribution of MPs in aquatic ecosystems (Lusher et al., 2013) and broad range of physicochemical properties makes a wide range of aquatic organisms potentially susceptible to these emerging contaminants.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lusher et al., 2013 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“there is a possibility that effect studies may be biased towards to a particular type of polymer without due consideration of reported occurrence in organisms and the environment, estimated release to the environment and bioavailability.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Nizzetto et al. (2016) report densities of 1040-1090 kg m -3 for PS and 910-940 kg m -3 for PE.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nizzetto et al., 2016
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The density of PS MPs is usually greater than PE MPs, so they may be available not only in the water column, but also in the sediment (Browne et al., 2007), representing a higher risk for both pelagic and demersal organisms”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Browne et al., 2007 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“while PE MPs have a lower density presenting a higher availability in the water column and potentially pose a higher risk for pelagic fish (Phuong et al., 2016).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Phuong et al., 2016 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This may reflect the difficulty in sampling smaller particles from environmental media as the size of MPs in biological samples collected in the environment may be biased by sampling and detection methodology that seem to contribute to the scarcity of reports of MP with a size b 50 μm.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such differences may be the result of difficulties in maintaining and handling large and/or long-lived organisms under controlled conditions.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the properties of the MP parent material are likely to influence both its physical behaviour in the environment (e.g.presence in the water column or in sediments), the potential to adsorb environmental contaminants, and its bioavailability”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Andrady and Neal, 2009
- Not checked yetcites Zarfl and Matthies, 2010
- Not checked yetcites Antunes et al., 2013 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, they may encounter more highly contaminated sediments, increasing the likelihood of synergistic effects of MPs with other environmental pollutants.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.1. Organism groups used in ecotoxicological studies with MPs
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Cole et al. (2013) reported that dead copepods can have adhered PS fragments, which could contribute to the vertical transport of this type of MP.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cole et al., 2013 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“considering that it is one of the most produced and demanded types of plastic, with about 20% of European production, much more than the 7% of production devoted to PS (Plastics Europe, 2017).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Plastics Europe, 2017
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This detection frequency largely reflects rates of plastic production, except that PS plastics are produced in greater amounts than either PES or PA.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Studies of small crustaceans include those by Cole et al. (2015) and Lee et al. (2013) who observed a decrease in survival and fecundity of the marine copepods Calanus helgolandicus (24 h and 216 h; 20 μm; 6.5-7.5 × 10 4 particles L -1 )”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cole et al., 2015 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Fish are generally intermediate/top predators (Oliveira et al., 2012(Oliveira et al., , 2013;;Pochberger et al., 2014;de Sá et al., 2015) and may ingest MPs either directly or through consumption of prey containing MPs.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“without affecting its survival (Kaposi et al., 2014).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kaposi et al., 2014 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given the differences in habits and physiology of marine and freshwater species, it is not clear to what extent results based on studies of marine organisms can be applied to freshwater species and vice versa.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.1. Organism groups used in ecotoxicological studies with MPs
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“They reported a LC 50 = 7.14 × 10 4 particles L -1 for PP MPs compared to LC 50 = 4.64 × 10 7 particles L -1 for PE MPs.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Au et al., 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Small crustaceans are often primary consumers (Desforges et al., 2014), as are planktonic rotifers.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Desforges et al., 2014 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Mazurais et al. (2015) reported mortality and induction of the cytochrome P450 (CYP P450) in D. labrax (846 h; 10-45 μm; 10-100 particles mg -1 of diet).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mazurais et al., 2015 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Jaikumar et al. (2018) showed that three Daphnia species showed different responses to primary and secondary MP exposure, and different interactive effects of MP exposure and thermal stress.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.1. Organism groups used in ecotoxicological studies with MPs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jaikumar et al., 2018 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The number of studies of D. magna may reflect its widespread use in ecotoxicology laboratories.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.1. Organism groups used in ecotoxicological studies with MPs
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, there are likely to be significant analytical challenges associated with conducting such studies.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.3. Interactive ecotoxicological effects of MPs with other contaminants
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“and Tigriopus japonicas (two generation test; 0.05-0.5 μm; 0.125-25 mg L -1 ) when exposed to PS MPs.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee et al., 2013 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A study using Scrobicularia plana (Ribeiro et al., 2017) reported increases in neurotoxicity and genotoxicity.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ribeiro et al., 2017 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Della Torre et al. (2014) described effects of PS MPs (6-48 h; 0.04-0.05μm; 1-50 mg L -1 ) on gene expression in the echinoderm Paracentrotus lividus, including an up-regulation of the Abcb1 gene responsible for protection and multi-drug resistance (Shipp and Hamdoun, 2012).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Della Torre et al., 2014 source
- Not checked yetcites Shipp and Hamdoun, 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This persistence of MPs in mussel tissues represents a possible source of toxicity to their predators and potentially to humans (e.g.De Witte et al., 2014;Van Cauwenberghe and Janssen, 2014)”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites De Witte et al., 2014 source
- Not checked yetcites Van Cauwenberghe and Janssen, 2014
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Hurley et al. (2018) report maximum sediment concentrations of ~440,000 particles m -2 , and an average of 16,000 particles m -2 .”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hurley et al., 2018 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“and Paracyclopina nana (24 h; 0.05-6 μm; 0.1-20 mg L -1 ).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jeong et al., 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is also undeniable that a large number of organisms are exposed to these particles and that this exposure may cause a variety of effects and threaten individuals of many different species, the ecosystems they live in and, ultimately, humans.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 4. Conclusions and future perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Polyethylene and PS MPs are clearly the most studied type of polymers, although others, specifically PP, PES and PA, may represent a similar danger for aquatic life.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 4. Conclusions and future perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While it is difficult to demonstrate, it is possible that this lack of studies in the literature reflects a bias against publishing negative results.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.3. Interactive ecotoxicological effects of MPs with other contaminants
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
The set of surveyed publications is representative of the available literature on MPs and aquatic organisms.
“The surveyed publications identified an equivalent number of studies conducted in the field (48%) and laboratory (52%) (Fig. 3A).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Molluscs include a large number of filter feeding species, with a high tendency for bioaccumulation.
“Molluscs include a large number of filter feeding species, with a high tendency for bioaccumulation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
These organism groups occupy a number of positions in aquatic food webs.
“These organism groups occupy a number of positions in aquatic food webs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the environment, organisms are simultaneously exposed to several contaminants.
“These studies are motivated by the situation found in the environment where organisms are simultaneously exposed to several contaminants.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Several of these organisms are widely used for food (e.g. M. edulis).
“Considering that several of these organisms are widely used for food (e.g.M. edulis)”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are many freshwater organisms with considerable trophic and commercial importance.
“Considering that there are many freshwater organisms with considerable trophic and commercial importance, this approach should be one of the directions that the study of MPs should take.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As reported by de Sá et al. [75], MPs can act as a carrier of pollutants in the marine food web.”
From Is Wild Marine Biota Affected by Microplastics? (2022) · cites this paper as [75]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
34 studies are not 12% of the stated total
MinorThe paper says it identified 612 studies. On that denominator, 34 studies are about 5.6%, not 12%; the text does not specify a different denominator for this claim.
Reported 12 · recomputed 5.555556
“Polyethylene was the most common type of MP studied in fish, it was reported in 34 studies, or 12% of the total number of studies identified.”
Interactive-study polymer percentages total 106%
MinorThe reported PE, PS, PVC and PP shares add to 106%, beyond rounding error. That conflicts with the paper's definition of a study by MP type, under which an article covering multiple types generates separate studies.
“Slightly more than half the studies (54%) were conducted using PE MPs.Polystyrene (29%), PVC (19%) and PP (4%) MPs were also reported.”
“A study was defined as a series of observations of one group of organisms, type of MPs, shape and/or size.Any article reporting data on more than one of the aforementioned categories generated a number of studies equal to the number of elements per premise.”
Citations
Cites
Microplastics in the marine environment
Andrady, A. L. (2011) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030 · Cited by 8,105
Lost at sea: where is all the plastic?
Thompson, R. C., Olsen, Y., Mitchell, R. P., Davis, A., Rowland, S. J., John, A. W. G., McGonigle, D., & Russell, A. E. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1094559 · Cited by 7,765
Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: A review
Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Halsband, C., & Galloway, T. S. (2011) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.09.025 · Cited by 6,023
Hidalgo-Ruz, V., Gutow, L., Thompson, R. C., & Thiel, M. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2031505 · Cited by 5,440
The Physical Impacts of Microplastics on Marine Organisms: A Review
Wright, S. L., Thompson, R. C., & Galloway, T. S. (2013) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2013.02.031 · Cited by 4,524
Horton, A. A., Walton, A., Spurgeon, D. J., Lahive, E., & Svendsen, C. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.190 · Cited by 3,756
Bergmann, M., Gutow, L., & Klages, M. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3 · Cited by 3,513
Plastics, the environment and human health: current consensus and future trends
Thompson, R. C., Moore, C. J., Saal, F. S. V., & Swan, S. H. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0053 · Cited by 3,069
Microplastic ingestion by zooplankton
Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Fileman, E., Halsband, C., Goodhead, R., Moger, J., & Galloway, T. S. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es400663f · Cited by 2,763
Auta, H. S., Emenike, C. U., & Fauziah, S. H. (2017) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.02.013 · Cited by 2,649
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 140 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,001
Rinaldis, G. D., Pastorino, P., Scirocco, T., Sacchetti, C., Anselmi, S., Provenza, F., Renzi, M., & Specchiulli, A. (2024) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics12060429 · Cited by 8
The Ecotoxicological Effects of Microplastics on Trophic Levels of Aquatic Ecosystems
Sönmez, V. Z., Akarsu, C., & Sivri, N. (2022) · Emerging contaminants and associated treatment technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89220-3_18 · Cited by 8
Do microplastics impair male dominance interactions in fish? A test of the vector hypothesis
Swank, A., Blevins, K., Bourne, A., & Ward, J. (2022) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.8620 · Cited by 8
MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION IN GANGA: PRESENT STATUS AND FUTURE NEED
Sarkar, D. J., Sarkar, S. D., Santhana Kumar, V., KUNDU, S., & Das, B. K. (2022) · Science and Culture · doi:10.36094/sc.v88.2022.microplastic_pollution_in_ganga.sarkar.400 · Cited by 8
“Studies have opined that lower aquatic organisms (planktonic life) prefer floating and less dense microplastics whereas, dense microplastics are favored by benthic invertebrates (amphipods, polychaete worms, mollusks and echinoderms) 9,10 .”
Bibi, A., Can, A., Pant, U., Hardiman, G., Hill, D., Elliott, C. T., & Cao, C. (2023) · Comprehensive analytical chemistry · doi:10.1016/bs.coac.2022.11.003 · Cited by 9
Bertoli, M., Lesa, D., Pastorino, P., Mele, A., Anselmi, S., Barceló, ., Prearo, M., Renzi, M., & Pizzul, E. (2023) · Journal of Contaminant Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2023.104253 · Cited by 8
Cozzolino, L., Nicastro, K. R., Lefebvre, S., Corona, L. S., Froneman, P. W., McQuaid, C. D., & Zardi, G. I. (2023) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115649 · Cited by 8
Ecotoxicological effects of microplastics and adsorbed contaminants on aquatic organisms
Dioses-Salinas, D. C., Pérez-Baca, B. L., & De-la-Torre, G. E. (2019) · Manglar · doi:10.17268/manglar.2019.024 · Cited by 8
“They include a large number of filter-feeding organisms (de Sá et al., 2018), like most bivalves, and marine grazers, such as most gastropods and polyplacophorans.”
BackgroundEffects of virgin and BaP-adsorbed microplastics ingestion by Manila clams (Ruditapes philippinarum)
Jessica, J., Cheng, S., & Cross, J. S. (2023) · Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.etap.2023.104259 · Cited by 7
Simantiris, N., Cladas, Y., Chochos, C. L., Gregoriou, V. G., Koutsikopoulos, C., Karapanagioti, H. K., Avlonitis, M., & Vardaki, M. Z. (2024) · Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science · doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2024.108775 · Cited by 7
Anandavelu, I., Karthik, R., Robin, R. S., Hariharan, G., Mugilarasan, M., Ramesh, R., & Purvaja, R. (2024) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136180 · Cited by 7
Báez‐Flores, M. E., Tiznado‐Hernández, M. E., Gracia-Valenzuela, M. H., & Troncoso‐Rojas, R. (2025) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms13061246 · Cited by 7
Microplastics at the ocean-atmosphere interface in Mexican coastal areas of two major oceans
Reynoso-Cruces, S., Edo, C., Rosal, R., Cervantes‐Uc, J. M., Herrera-Kao, W. A., Ortiz, A. O., & Álvarez‐Ospina, H. (2025) · Marine Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2025.107288 · Cited by 8
Tajwar, M., Muntaha, S., Ashraf, A., Islam, M. S., & Saha, S. K. (2026) · Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances · doi:10.1016/j.hazadv.2026.101017 · Cited by 8
Karimian, M., & Yaqubi, S. (2026) · Toxicology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2026.102226 · Cited by 8
“The wide and hydrophobic surface of MPs makes them suitable for absorbing many pollutants including heavy metals and EDCs and makes it possible for them to accumulate in different tissues [124].”
Santos, A., Oliveira, M., & Venâncio, C. (2023) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2023.117110 · Cited by 8
Self-citationRecent Study of Separation and Identification of Micro- and Nanoplastics for Aquatic Products
Xu, J. G., Gan, W., Wang, H., Ding, Z., & Xie, J. (2023) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym15214207 · Cited by 7
Sapkale, D., Kurkute, P., Mistry, A., & Pandit, S. V. (2023) · Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00128-023-03813-6 · Cited by 9
“Environmental sampling from seawater and rivers has proved the presence of MPs, which are being consumed by various organisms ranging from planktons to complex vertebrates (De Sá et al. 2018; Borriello et al. 2022; de Carvalho et al. 2022).”
BackgroundMora-Teddy, A. K., Closs, G. P., & Matthaei, C. D. (2023) · Limnology and Oceanography Methods · doi:10.1002/lom3.10585 · Cited by 7
“Moreover, a wide range of negative effects of microplastics on freshwater organisms has been documented (Mattsson et al. 2017; de Sa et al. 2018; Ma et al. 2019), making microplastics an emerging contaminant of considerable concern.”
BackgroundCid, A., Nunes, C. S. E., Martínez, C. L., & Diniz, M. (2024) · Biomimetics · doi:10.3390/biomimetics9050303 · Cited by 7
“For instance, mussels are one of the chief groups of organisms used for the assessment of many pollutants and toxic substances in the marine environment, including MNPs [56–58].”
BackgroundHaskell, H., Suckling, C. C., Marta Gómez-chiarri, G., McMahon, K. W., Preziosi, B. M., & Davies, A. J. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2024.152032 · Cited by 7
Laiz, I., Foletti, N., Teles‐Machado, A., Plecha, S. M., Peliz, Á., Sánchez-Leal, R. F., & Bolado-Penagos, M. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175212 · Cited by 7
A Call for Collaboration among Water Quality and Fisheries Professionals
Kusnierz, P. C., Jager, H. I., & Todd, A. S. (2019) · Fisheries · doi:10.1002/fsh.10366 · Cited by 7
Assessment of physicochemical parameters and metal contents of Mansagar lake of Jaipur
Singh, Y. L., & Jain, M. K. (2021) · Environmental Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12665-021-09576-9 · Cited by 7
Subba, M., Keough, M. J., Kellar, C. R., Long, S. M., Miranda, A. F., & Pettigrove, V. J. (2021) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117563 · Cited by 7
Nucleation and detachment of polystyrene nanoparticles from plowing-induced surface wrinkling
Hennig, J., Litschko, A., Mazo, J. J., & Gnecco, E. (2021) · Applied Surface Science Advances · doi:10.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100148 · Cited by 7
The Role of Rivers in Microplastics Spread and Pollution
Suteja, Y., & Purwiyanto, A. I. S. (2022) · Environmental footprints and eco-design of products and processes · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-8440-1_4 · Cited by 8
THE EVALUATION OF MICROPLASTIC PARTICLES IN THE WATER AREA OF LAKE LADOGA
Иванова, Е. В., Тихонова, Д. А., Иванова, Е. В., & Tikhonova, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences · doi:10.17076/lim1582 · Cited by 7
Evidence of microplastic-mediated transfer of PCB-153 to sea urchin tissues using radiotracers
Pyl, M., Taylor, A., Oberhänsli, F., Swarzenski, P. W., Besson, M., Danis, B., & Métian, M. (2022) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114322 · Cited by 7
Kong, Z. H., Burdon, F. J., Truchy, A., Bundschuh, M., Futter, M. N., Hurley, R. R., & McKie, B. G. (2023) · Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00027-023-00964-w · Cited by 9
“MPs might also be incorporated into chironomid tubes, as observed previously for Trichoptera larvae (Ehlers et al. 2019), potentially altering the functioning of these structures (Ehlers et al. 2020).”
BackgroundSelf-citationHe, X., Li, H., & Zhu, J. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141665 · Cited by 7
Developing Neo-bioplastics for the Realization of Carbon Sustainable Society
Nakanishi, A., Iritani, K., & Sakihama, Y. (2020) · Journal of Nanotechnology and Nanomaterials · doi:10.33696/nanotechnol.1.010 · Cited by 7
“In addition, it was revealed that organisms in the oceans, which ingested microplastics, experienced induced disruption of biological processes, gastrointestinal irritation, changes in the microbiome, lipid metabolism, and oxidative stress [50-52].”
BackgroundMicroplastics: A Global Water Pollution Problem
Weinstein, J. E., Viado, H. F., Leads, R. R., Deloughry, E., Schandera, L., Liddy, K., & Scott, G. I. (2019) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119300762.wsts0203 · Cited by 7
Sources, Occurrence, and Analysis of Microplastics in Freshwater Environments
Ta, A. T., & Babel, S. (2022) · doi:10.1002/9781119800897.ch1 · Cited by 7
Walker, D. I., Baker‐Austin, C., Smith, A. J., Thorpe, K. L., Bakir, A., Galloway, T. S., Ganther, S., Gaze, W., Lewis, C. N., Russell, J., et al. (2022) · doi:10.46756/sci.fsa.xdx112 · Cited by 8
Microplastics in Freshwater Systems: A Review on Its Accumulation and Effects on FishesPreprint
Raza, A. (2018) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints201810.0696.v1 · Cited by 7
Alak, G., & Yavaş, R. N. (2024) · Journal of Food Safety · doi:10.1111/jfs.13173 · Cited by 6
Chorvatova, A. M., Mateašík, A., & Chorvat, D., Jr. (2025) · Microplastics and Nanoplastics · doi:10.1186/s43591-025-00111-2 · Cited by 6
Bhaumik, S., Baishnab, S. S., Shahir, A., Mahapatra, S., & Mandal, S. (2025) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118112 · Cited by 6
Effects of laundry-derived microplastic fibers on larval Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes)
Mizukami‐Murata, S., Tsushima, I., Abe, S., Kitamura, T., & Okayasu, Y. (2025) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179657 · Cited by 6
Rejeb, O., Afsa, S., Toumi, D., Rando, R., Hassani, R., Harzallah‐Skhiri, F., Mansour, H. B., & Bella, G. D. (2025) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114909 · Cited by 6
Pattnaik, S., & Pinsky, E. (2025) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics13100820 · Cited by 6
Oduro, C., Geng, Y., Dalu, T., Okrah, A., Kyei–Nuamah, D., Khan, S., Chen, J., Mu, H., & Wu, N. (2025) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-025-01227-1 · Cited by 7
Zhang, Z., Ling, S., Qian, X., Peng, C., & Zhang, W. (2026) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2026.108098 · Cited by 6
Arcadio, C. G. L. A., Maglupay, J. R. U., Po, A. M., Pardillo, J. J. B., & Bacosa, H. P. (2026) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology15060455 · Cited by 6
“Microplastic-mediated exposure is dependent on how organisms interact with particles in their surroundings, in contrast to simply chemical exposures [40], which may be approximated by external concentrations.”
Ecotoxicity of Heteroaggregates of Polystyrene Nanospheres in Chironomidae and Amphibian
Mouchet, F., Rowenczyk, L., Minet, A., Clergeaud, F., Silvestre, J., Pinelli, É., Ferriol, J., Leflaive, J., Ten‐Hage, L., Gigault, J., et al. (2022) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano12152730 · Cited by 6
The Microplastics Occurrence and Toxic Effects in Marine Environment
Yap, H. S., Shukor, M. Y., & Yasid, N. A. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Microbiology and Toxicology · doi:10.54987/jemat.v10i2.733 · Cited by 5
Kim, C., Song, J., & Jung, J. (2023) · Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00128-023-03705-9 · Cited by 6
“MPs are a growing concern due to their potential harms: intestinal damage, oxidative stress, neurotoxicity, and behavioral change when ingested by organisms (De Sá et al. 2018; Botterell et al. 2019; Gola et al. 2021).”
BackgroundLiu, L., Wei, D., Huang, H., Guo, C., Liu, J., Hu, C., & Hu, C. (2023) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2023.106802 · Cited by 6
Genes of filter-feeding species as a potential toolkit for monitoring microplastic impacts
Ortiz-Moriano, M. P., García‐Vázquez, E., & Machado‐Schiaffino, G. (2025) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2024.107234 · Cited by 6
Implications of plastic ingestion on the growth and fledging success of shearwaters
Puskic, P. S., Graham-Blair, J., Burgess, E. A., Bridle, A. R., Lea, M., & Roman, L. (2025) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178174 · Cited by 6
Microplastics magnify inhibitive effects of perfluorooctanoic acid on the marine microbial loop
Lin, P., Liu, X., Gao, Z., Yuan, Y., Liu, H., Huang, L., He, Z., Zeng, Q., & Wang, S. (2025) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2025.121223 · Cited by 7
Distribution of Microplastics in the Marine Environment
Strafella, P., Correa, M. L., Pyko, I., Teichert, S., & Gomiero, A. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39041-9_43 · Cited by 12
Uptake of plastic microbeads by ciliate Paramecium aurelia
Nugroho, F. A., & Fyda, J. (2020) · Science Technology and Innovation · doi:10.5604/01.3001.0014.4173 · Cited by 6
Kučera, J., Belišová, N., Mackuľak, T., Ryba, J., Douda, K., Bondarev, D., Slavík, O., Tamáš, M., Escobar‐Calderón, F., & Horký, P. (2022) · Fishes · doi:10.3390/fishes7060323 · Cited by 6
Ecological status of the highly impacted Guanabara Bay assessed using macrofaunal indicators
de Figueiredo, G. M., PEIXOTO, A. J. M., Brito, A. D. R., Paiva, P. C., & Silva, N. K. (2022) · Regional Studies in Marine Science · doi:10.1016/j.rsma.2022.102745 · Cited by 6
Kojima, M., Fujita, R., Hirohashi, Y., Seto, H., & Shinto, H. (2023) · Advanced Powder Technology · doi:10.1016/j.apt.2023.103995 · Cited by 7
Facemasks: An insight into their abundance in wetlands, degradation, and potential ecotoxicity
Paço, A., Oliveira, A. M., Ferreira-Filipe, D. A., Rodrigues, A. C. M., Rocha, R. J. M., Soares, A. M. V. M., Duarte, A. C., Silva, A. L. P., & Rocha‐Santos, T. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166232 · Cited by 6
Micro/nanoplastics: a potential threat to crops
Sun, L., Wang, X., Zhao, H., Wang, Z., Zhao, Y., Huang, H., Yang, R., Wang, S., & Zhao, W. (2023) · Vegetable Research · doi:10.48130/vr-2023-0018 · Cited by 6
Matskiv, T., Martyniuk, V., Khoma, V., Yunko, K., Orlova-Hudim, K., Gnatyshyna, L. L., Geffard, A., Ladeiro, M. P., & Stoliar, O. B. (2023) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpc.2023.109803 · Cited by 6
Douda, K., Escobar‐Calderón, F., Vodáková, B., Horký, P., Slavík, O., & Sousa, R. (2020) · Conservation Physiology · doi:10.1093/conphys/coaa088 · Cited by 6
Prata, J. C., Castro, J. L., da Costa, J. P., Cerqueira, M., Duarte, A. C., & Rocha‐Santos, T. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10618-8_37-2 · Cited by 10
Noor, S. Y., Riani, E., Hariyadi, S., Butet, N. A., & Cordova, M. R. (2025) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-025-13933-7 · Cited by 6
“This indicates that, even with a restricted sample size, variations in microplastic characteristics are distinctly observable and closely associated with fish feeding behavior and habitat (de Sá et al., 2018; Richardson et al., 2021a, 2021b).”
de Oliveira, C. G., Boaventura, T. P., dos Santos, F. A. C., Souza, A. D. S., Silva, S. D. S., Gil, C. S. B., Luz, R. K., & Oréfice, R. L. (2025) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2025.107338 · Cited by 7
Distribution, sources, and transport of microplastics in a karst river of Southwest China
Yang, Y.-Z., Ma, X., Zhou, S., & Zhou, L. (2025) · Environmental Technology & Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.eti.2025.104252 · Cited by 5
Bhuyan, M. S., Nayan, A. H., Chowdhury, S., Chowdhury, S. U. M. B., Mondal, M. A. I., Islam, M. T., Karim, S. M. R., Meraj, G., & Abouleish, M. Y. (2025) · Discover Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s44339-025-00034-w · Cited by 6
“De Sá et al. [47] reported that the taxonomic group that was examined the most was crustaceans, which were followed by fish, mollusks, worms, echinoderms, and rotifers.”
Modeling river and urban related microplastic pollution off the southern United States
Zhou, X., Xiao, S., Ramirez, M., & Bracco, A. (2025) · npj Emerging Contaminants · doi:10.1038/s44454-025-00011-3 · Cited by 5
A review on microplastics in aquatic ecosystems: Prevalence, ecological risks, and solutions
bakhat, H., Amir, I., Kazmi, A., Ali, A., Luna‐Arias, J. P., Medina-Pérez, G., Peláez-Acero, A., & Islam, M. F. (2025) · Ecological Frontiers · doi:10.1016/j.ecofro.2025.08.006 · Cited by 7
Peivasteh-Roudsari, L., Javanmardi, F., Gilani, P. S., Tajdar‐oranj, B., Doost, Z. S., Yazdanbakhsh, H., & Başaran, B. (2025) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods14203547 · Cited by 8
Chandravanshi, R., Tiwari, A., Tiwari, A., Dubey, R., & Pandey, S. K. (2026) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2026.122530 · Cited by 6
Ecological traits do not predict the uptake of microplastics by fishes in a Neotropical River
da Costa, I. D., Costa, L. L., Cordeiro, C. A. M. M., & Zalmon, I. R. (2023) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-023-29013-7 · Cited by 5
Impact of Microplastics on Flora and Fauna
Reshi, Q. M., Ahmed, I., Ahmad, I., & Fazio, F. (2023) · BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS eBooks · doi:10.2174/9789815165104123010006 · Cited by 5
Adsorption of Heavy Metal with Aged Microplastic in Groundwater Under Varying Organic Matter Content
Singh, J., & Yadav, B. K. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49092-7_1 · Cited by 5
Eid, Z., Mahmoud, U. M., & Sayed, A. E. H. (2024) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2024.1380652 · Cited by 5
Ujuagu, G. I., Ejeromedoghene, O., Enwemiwe, V. N., Mgbechidinma, C. L., Omoniyi, A. O., Oladipo, A., & Gu, J. (2024) · Toxicology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2024.101873 · Cited by 6
DeLouise, L. A. (2020) · Open Access Journal of Toxicology · doi:10.19080/oajt.2020.04.555637 · Cited by 6
Кондратюк, В. М., & Otchenashko, V. (2021) · Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences · doi:10.5219/1601 · Cited by 5
Contaminación por microplásticos en playas del Pacífico de Guatemala: abundancia y características
Mazariegos-Ortíz, C., García-Arroyave, L., Marroquín-Mora, C., & Mendizábal, A. L. (2021) · Ciencia Tecnología y Salud · doi:10.36829/63cts.v8i2.904 · Cited by 5
“Discusión La contaminación por MPs está siendo ampliamente estudiada en diferentes animales de ecosistemas tanto terrestres como marinos y costeros (de Sá et al., 2018; de Souza Machado, 2018).”
BackgroundHewins, B., & Gibson, G. (2022) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/cjz-2021-0044 · Cited by 8
Rodríguez‐Pérez, C., de Rodrigáñez, M. S., & Pula, H. J. (2022) · Advances in food and nutrition research · doi:10.1016/bs.afnr.2022.08.003 · Cited by 5
Impact of Plastic Waste Ingestion by Fish
Cruz, A. (2022) · Circular Economy and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43615-022-00242-1 · Cited by 6
Saleh, R., Daud, A., Ishak, H., Amqam, H., Wahyu, A., Stang, S., Birawida, A. B., & Mallongi, A. (2023) · Pharmacognosy Journal · doi:10.5530/pj.2023.15.137 · Cited by 5
MOULATLET, G. M., Truchet, D. M., Capparelli, M. V., Villalobos, F., & Buzzi, N. S. (2023) · Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health · doi:10.1016/j.coesh.2023.100507 · Cited by 5
Rodríguez, A. M., Marchant, D. J., Francelle, P., Kratina, P., & Jones, J. I. (2023) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122511 · Cited by 6
Altitudinal variation of microplastic abundance in lakeshore sediments from Italian lakes
Parolini, M., Perin, E., Felice, B. D., Gazzotti, S., Palazzi, A., Conti, L., Conterosito, E., Rosio, E., Bruno, F., Gianotti, V., et al. (2024) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-024-33648-5 · Cited by 5
“Therefore, plastics can experience weathering processes mediated by mechanical erosion, physical abrasion, solar radiation, and biological degradation (De Sá et al. 2018), which lead to their degradation, breakage, and fragmentation in small-sized (i.e., debris) items.”
BackgroundImpact of microplastics on human health and aquatic species
Achoukhi, I., Hammoudani, Y. E., Haboubi, K., Benaabidate, L., Bourjila, A., Boudammoussi, M. E., Moudou, M., Faiz, H., Touzani, A., & Dimane, F. (2024) · E3S Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202452702001 · Cited by 6
Morais, F., Pires, V., Almeida, M., Martins, M. A., Oliveira, M., & Lopes, I. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175375 · Cited by 5
Self-citationMicroplastics contamination in marine system
Kumar, A., Agrawal, M., Singh, A. K., Singh, H., & Kumar, P. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-29804-2.00008-1 · Cited by 5
Impacto de la ingesta de residuos plásticos en peces
Condor, E. W. E., Villasante, Y. I., Riva, A., Panduro, G. R., & Cruz, A. (2020) · Revista Kawsaypacha Sociedad y Medio Ambiente · doi:10.18800/kawsaypacha.201902.004 · Cited by 6
Alignment Layer of Liquid Crystal Using Plant-Based Isoeugenol-Substituted Polystyrene
Yang, D., Seo, K., & Kang, H. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13040547 · Cited by 5
Korez, Š., Gutow, L., & Saborowski, R. (2022) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119023 · Cited by 5
Role of Microorganisms in Eco-remediation
Silva, A. L. P. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39041-9_54 · Cited by 5
Role of Microplastics as Attachment Media for the Growth of Microorganisms
Ukil, M., Roy, S., Choudhury, A. R., & Palani, S. G. (2022) · Environmental footprints and eco-design of products and processes · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-8440-1_14 · Cited by 6
Plastic, microplastic, and the inconsistency of human thought
Ragusa, A., Luca, C. D., Zucchelli, E., Rinaldo, D., & Svelato, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1145240 · Cited by 5
Knauss, C. M., Dungan, C. F., & Lehmann, S. A. (2021) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.5216 · Cited by 6
“They occur in all environmental compartments, including water (Bergmann et al., 2015; Li et al., 2018), soil (Piehl et al., 2018), air (Cox et al., 2019; Wright et al., 2020), and organisms (de Sá et al., 2018; Lusher et al., 2017).”
BackgroundEzraneti, R., Hassan, N. A., Miskon, M. F., & Mohamed, J. (2025) · Oriental Journal Of Chemistry · doi:10.13005/ojc/400601 · Cited by 4
Zeynali, M., Yavari, V., Morshedi, V., Ghasemi, A., Kochanian, P., Karapetyan, A. F., & Mozanzadeh, M. T. (2025) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144419 · Cited by 4
ALI, A. E., Sonne, C., Aslam, M., Ali, I., HUSSAIN, S., Qadir, A., Sukhera, S., Ali, H., Ahmad, S. R., & Yang, G. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0330253 · Cited by 4
Cesarini, G., Orlandi, M., Sbarberi, R., Sabatino, R., Magni, S., Binelli, A., Santi, N., Schiavetta, D., Kamburska, L., Zanini, M., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-18595-6 · Cited by 5
“Other studies have reported no significant relationship between crayfish size and MP size ingested 60 18 , while adults consume more detritus and plants 67 .”
Impact of Microplastics and Nanoplastics on Plant Health and Development
Dawood, M. F. A., Hamed, H., & El-Mahdy, M. T. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-99774-7_5 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- de Sá, L. C., Oliveira, M., Ribeiro, F., Rocha, T. L., & Futter, M. N.
- Affiliations
- Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar (PT)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Futter, Martyn Norman
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 645
- Pages
- 1029-1039
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2883238699
- Semantic Scholar
- b9222c4f4ecd7e923efa6319e707a47b84633bce
- Cited by
- 1,316
- References
- 140
- Citations by year
- 2026: 80 · 2025: 150 · 2024: 179 · 2023: 189 · 2022: 214 · 2021: 207 · 2020: 205 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Swedish Research Council FORMAS (2017-00029)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Keywords
- microplastics, aquatic organisms, microplastic ingestion, ecotoxicology, polymer types, particle size and shape, microfibers, microplastic fragments, fish, invertebrates, mechanism of action, environmental exposure
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Environmental Monitoring, Plastics, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Ecotoxicology, Aquatic Organisms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
