The DOI matches its Crossref record; 139 of the 140 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 89 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future?
Open accessAbstract
The effects of microplastics (MP) on aquatic organisms are currently the subject of intense research. Here, we provide a critical perspective on published studies of MP ingestion by aquatic biota. We summarize the available research on MP presence, behaviour and effects on aquatic organisms monitored in the field and on laboratory studies of the ecotoxicological consequences of MP ingestion. We consider MP polymer type, shape, size as well as group of organisms studied and type of effect reported. Specifically, we evaluate whether or not the available laboratory studies of MP are representative of the types of MPs found in the environment and whether or not they have reported on relevant groups or organisms. Analysis of the available data revealed that 1) despite their widespread detection in field-based studies, polypropylene, polyester and polyamide particles were under-represented in laboratory studies; 2) fibres and fragments (800-1600 μm) are the most common form of MPs reported in animals collected from the field; 3) to date, most studies have been conducted on fish; knowledge is needed about the effects of MPs on other groups of organisms, especially invertebrates. Furthermore, there are significant mismatches between the types of MP most commonly found in the environment or reported in field studies and those used in laboratory experiments. Finally, there is an overarching need to understand the mechanism of action and ecotoxicological effects of environmentally relevant concentrations of MPs on aquatic organism health.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review surveys 157 articles and 612 studies on microplastics in aquatic organisms, finding research skewed toward fish and small crustaceans, PE/PS polymers, and laboratory concentrations often higher than environmental levels. It highlights mismatches between field-detected microplastic shapes, sizes, and polymers and those used in laboratory ecotoxicology, and calls for more environmentally relevant, freshwater, and mechanism-focused work.
Key findings
- Across field and laboratory studies, the most commonly reported microplastics were PE (23%) and PS (22%), followed by PP (12%) and PES (9%); fish were the most studied organism group (44%), followed by crustacea (21% combined), molluscs (14%), and annelid worms (6%).
- Field and laboratory studies were roughly balanced (48% field, 52% laboratory), but fish dominated field studies (23% of all studies) while small crustaceans dominated laboratory studies (17%); 24% of field studies did not report the typology of microplastics present in biota.
- Laboratory studies most often used spherical microplastics (17%) and particles <50 μm (75 of 169 laboratory studies where size was reported), whereas field-collected organisms most often contained fibres (23%) and fragments (21%), with 800–1600 μm and 400–800 μm each reported in 12% of field studies.
- Among 130 studies reporting ecotoxicological effects, crustaceans were most studied (45%), followed by fish (21%), molluscs (18%), annelid worms (7%), echinoderms (7%), and rotifers (2%); ecotoxicological studies used marine organisms 77% of the time versus freshwater organisms 23%.
Methods
- A bibliographic survey was conducted on November 22, 2017 using the Thompson Reuters ISI Web of Science database with the keyword “microplastic*”; 1,637 candidate publications were identified and 157 were retained for analysis.
- Retained studies were summarized by microplastic type, shape, size range, organism group, and ecotoxicological effect; a “study” was defined as an interaction of organism group, MP type, MP shape, and MP size, yielding 612 studies from the 157 articles.
- The review tabulated and summarized published field and laboratory studies; no attempt was made to separate direct ecotoxicological effects from organism responses associated with starvation following MP ingestion.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: laboratory studies often use unrealistically high MP concentrations; 24% of field studies did not report MP typology; freshwater organisms are under-studied; there is a possible publication bias against negative results; and analytical challenges limit understanding of whether MPs adsorb contaminants once inside organisms.
- Stated in the paper: no attempt was made to separate direct ecotoxicological effects from starvation-related responses, and the review did not include plants or microbes.
- Evident from the text: the review relies on a single database and a single search date, and its findings depend on the author-defined classification criteria and the available published literature.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 89 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our search identified 157 published, peer-reviewed articles which documented a total of 612 studies (listed in supplementary information).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 2. Methodological approach
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were relatively few studies of PE in vertebrates other than fish.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fish are the most studied organism group in the field (23% of all studies)”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The surveyed publications identified an equivalent number of studies conducted in the field (48%) and laboratory (52%) (Fig. 3A).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most common types of MPs reported in biota collected during field sampling include PE (17%), PP (14%), PES (13%), PA (10%) and PS MPs (9%) (Fig. S1).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the laboratory, smaller particles (b50 μm) were used most commonly (75 / 169 laboratory studies where MP size was reported) (Fig. S2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To date, ecotoxicological studies of MPs have been conducted predominantly using marine (77%) as opposed to freshwater (23%) organisms (Fig. 3B).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.1. Organism groups used in ecotoxicological studies with MPs
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“whereas small crustaceans are the group most studied in the laboratory (17% of all studies) (Fig. 3A).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, a sizeable fraction of the field studies (24%) did not report the typology of MPs present in the biota (Fig. S1).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The size range 800-1600 μm, the most commonly reported from field samples of biota represents a very small fraction of the sizes used in the laboratory (Fig. S2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 20
- The quote only partly states this claim. 4
- It may state two separate claims as one. 48
- Borderline: one of the tests for a substantial claim is unclear. 1
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 1637 candidate publications were identified.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 2. Methodological approach
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fish were the most commonly studied group of organisms (44%), followed by crustacea (21% for large and small crustacea combined), molluscs (14%) and annelid worms (6%) (Fig. 2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 1637 candidate publications, 157 were retained for further analysis.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 2. Methodological approach
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The presence of PE was reported less commonly in other groups of organisms, with 12 studies on molluscs, seven on small crustaceans and four on annelids (Fig. 2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The types of MPs most commonly reported across field and laboratory studies include PE (23%) and PS (22%), followed by PP (12%) and PES (9%) (Fig. 1).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effects of PS MPs have been reported in studies of fish (n = 17) and small crustaceans (n = 19) (Fig. 2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Polyethylene was the most common type of MP studied in fish, it was reported in 34 studies, or 12% of the total number of studies identified.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In fact, only 8% of the laboratory studies have been performed with PP MPs whereas PS and PE MPs were used in 40% and 33% of the studies respectively (Fig. S1).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The MP size used or reported in published studies also varies and is related to MP shape (Fig. S2), with almost every shape having been reported across all size ranges (Fig. S2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The size ranges 800-1600 μm (12%) and 400-800 μm (12%) were the most commonly reported in animals collected from the field, followed by 200-400 μm (11%) (Fig. S2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fibres and fragments were reported in 23% and 21% of studies, respectively, followed by spheres (11%), film (8%) and pellets (4%) (Fig. S2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, in laboratory studies, spherical MPs have been the most commonly used shape (17%) followed by fibres, fragments and unspecified particles (all 3%) (Fig. S2).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While field studies generally reflect reported plastic production rates, these polymers were not studied with similar frequency in laboratory assays (Fig. S1).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the reports of MPs in marine organisms, fish are the most commonly studied group (25%), followed by molluscs (15%), small crustacea (11%), large crustacea (8%) annelid worms (6%), mammals and echinoderms (both 3%), birds and cnidaria (both 2%), porifera, reptiles and rotifers (all b 1%) (Fig. 3B).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.1. Organism groups used in ecotoxicological studies with MPs
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Multiple freshwater studies only exist for fish (13% overall, 56% of the freshwater studies) and small crustacea (8% overall, 35% of the freshwater studies).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.1. Organism groups used in ecotoxicological studies with MPs
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Other commonly studied species include the freshwater fish Danio rerio (7%) (Khan et al., 2015;Lu et al., 2016;Chen et al., 2017aChen et al., , 2017b;;Sleight et al., 2017;Veneman et al., 2017;Lei et al., 2018)”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.1. Organism groups used in ecotoxicological studies with MPs
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Crustaceans were the most commonly studied taxonomic group (45%), followed by fish (21%), molluscs (18%), annelid worms (7%), echinoderms (7%) and rotifers (2%).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Overall, documented effects of MPs on aquatic organisms include reduction of feeding activity (Besseling et al., 2013;de Sá et al., 2015), oxidative stress (Della Torre et al., 2014), genotoxicity (Della Torre et al., 2014), neurotoxicity (Oliveira et al., 2012(Oliveira et al., , 2013;;Luis et al., 2015;Ribeiro et al., 2017), growth delay (Della Torre et al., 2014;Au et al., 2015;Redondo-Hasselerh”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Slightly more than half the studies (54%) were conducted using PE MPs.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.3. Interactive ecotoxicological effects of MPs with other contaminants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most studies had been performed on fish (63%), with some studies of molluscs (19%), crustacea (14%) and annelid worms (5%).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.3. Interactive ecotoxicological effects of MPs with other contaminants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Polystyrene (29%), PVC (19%) and PP (4%) MPs were also reported.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.3. Interactive ecotoxicological effects of MPs with other contaminants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies examined the combined effects of MPs with legacy POPs (64%), endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs; 17%), metals (10%), antibiotics (7%) and herbicides (2%).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.3. Interactive ecotoxicological effects of MPs with other contaminants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the effects of MPs on freshwater organisms are much less well known.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 4. Conclusions and future perspectives
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“since these particles, namely PP, are manufactured in large scale and detected in aquatic organisms in the higher quantities than PS”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 4. Conclusions and future perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The occurrence and accumulation of MPs in the aquatic environment is nowadays an undeniable fact.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 4. Conclusions and future perspectives
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is also undeniable that a large number of organisms are exposed to these particles and that this exposure may cause a variety of effects and threaten individuals of many different species, the ecosystems they live in and, ultimately, humans.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 4. Conclusions and future perspectives
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The potential deleterious effects of MPs on aquatic biota have been recognized by the scientific community as demonstrated by the increasing number of studies in the last years focussing primarily on marine biota.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 4. Conclusions and future perspectives
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, results suggest a knowledge gap on the effects of PE MPs on other organisms beyond fish and PS MPs on all groups of organisms except fish and small crustaceans.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 4. Conclusions and future perspectives
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Ingestion of PE by fish is both widespread and crosses habitat preferences.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lusher et al. (2013) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mechanisms of MP action on organism health still poorly understood”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Taxonomic groups in which PS MPs were detected include the marine copepods Acartia spp.and Eurytemora affinis (Setälä et al., 2014), large crustaceans such as the estuarine mysid Neomysis integer (Setälä et al., 2014) and the crab Uca rapax (Brennecke et al., 2015).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No attempt was made to separate direct ecotoxicological effects from e.g.organism responses associated with starvation following MP ingestion.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 2. Methodological approach
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Sections 3.2.1-3.2.3 where MPs effects are described, only studies which report MP effects on organisms were considered.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 2. Methodological approach
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“For example, Lusher et al. (2013) showed that over one third of fish examined in their study had ingested MPs, with pelagic and benthic fish displaying similar gut contents, suggesting either a lack of selectivity or widespread presence of PE in both the water column and sediments.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lusher et al. (2013) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most lab studies are conducted at unrealistically high MP concentrations”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearBorderline substantial claim. It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“The widespread distribution of MPs in aquatic ecosystems (Lusher et al., 2013) and broad range of physicochemical properties makes a wide range of aquatic organisms potentially susceptible to these emerging contaminants.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lusher et al., 2013 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“there is a possibility that effect studies may be biased towards to a particular type of polymer without due consideration of reported occurrence in organisms and the environment, estimated release to the environment and bioavailability.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Nizzetto et al. (2016) report densities of 1040-1090 kg m -3 for PS and 910-940 kg m -3 for PE.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nizzetto et al., 2016
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The density of PS MPs is usually greater than PE MPs, so they may be available not only in the water column, but also in the sediment (Browne et al., 2007), representing a higher risk for both pelagic and demersal organisms”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Browne et al., 2007 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“while PE MPs have a lower density presenting a higher availability in the water column and potentially pose a higher risk for pelagic fish (Phuong et al., 2016).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Phuong et al., 2016 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This may reflect the difficulty in sampling smaller particles from environmental media as the size of MPs in biological samples collected in the environment may be biased by sampling and detection methodology that seem to contribute to the scarcity of reports of MP with a size b 50 μm.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such differences may be the result of difficulties in maintaining and handling large and/or long-lived organisms under controlled conditions.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the properties of the MP parent material are likely to influence both its physical behaviour in the environment (e.g.presence in the water column or in sediments), the potential to adsorb environmental contaminants, and its bioavailability”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Andrady and Neal, 2009
- Not checked yetcites Zarfl and Matthies, 2010
- Not checked yetcites Antunes et al., 2013 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, they may encounter more highly contaminated sediments, increasing the likelihood of synergistic effects of MPs with other environmental pollutants.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.1. Organism groups used in ecotoxicological studies with MPs
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Cole et al. (2013) reported that dead copepods can have adhered PS fragments, which could contribute to the vertical transport of this type of MP.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.1. Types of MPs and target groups reported in field and laboratory studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cole et al., 2013 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“considering that it is one of the most produced and demanded types of plastic, with about 20% of European production, much more than the 7% of production devoted to PS (Plastics Europe, 2017).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Plastics Europe, 2017
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This detection frequency largely reflects rates of plastic production, except that PS plastics are produced in greater amounts than either PES or PA.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.1.2. Reports of organisms exposed to MPs in field and laboratory conditions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Studies of small crustaceans include those by Cole et al. (2015) and Lee et al. (2013) who observed a decrease in survival and fecundity of the marine copepods Calanus helgolandicus (24 h and 216 h; 20 μm; 6.5-7.5 × 10 4 particles L -1 )”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cole et al., 2015 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Fish are generally intermediate/top predators (Oliveira et al., 2012(Oliveira et al., , 2013;;Pochberger et al., 2014;de Sá et al., 2015) and may ingest MPs either directly or through consumption of prey containing MPs.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“without affecting its survival (Kaposi et al., 2014).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kaposi et al., 2014 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given the differences in habits and physiology of marine and freshwater species, it is not clear to what extent results based on studies of marine organisms can be applied to freshwater species and vice versa.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.1. Organism groups used in ecotoxicological studies with MPs
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“They reported a LC 50 = 7.14 × 10 4 particles L -1 for PP MPs compared to LC 50 = 4.64 × 10 7 particles L -1 for PE MPs.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Au et al., 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Small crustaceans are often primary consumers (Desforges et al., 2014), as are planktonic rotifers.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Desforges et al., 2014 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Mazurais et al. (2015) reported mortality and induction of the cytochrome P450 (CYP P450) in D. labrax (846 h; 10-45 μm; 10-100 particles mg -1 of diet).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mazurais et al., 2015 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Jaikumar et al. (2018) showed that three Daphnia species showed different responses to primary and secondary MP exposure, and different interactive effects of MP exposure and thermal stress.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.1. Organism groups used in ecotoxicological studies with MPs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jaikumar et al., 2018 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The number of studies of D. magna may reflect its widespread use in ecotoxicology laboratories.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.1. Organism groups used in ecotoxicological studies with MPs
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, there are likely to be significant analytical challenges associated with conducting such studies.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.3. Interactive ecotoxicological effects of MPs with other contaminants
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“and Tigriopus japonicas (two generation test; 0.05-0.5 μm; 0.125-25 mg L -1 ) when exposed to PS MPs.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee et al., 2013 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A study using Scrobicularia plana (Ribeiro et al., 2017) reported increases in neurotoxicity and genotoxicity.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ribeiro et al., 2017 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Della Torre et al. (2014) described effects of PS MPs (6-48 h; 0.04-0.05μm; 1-50 mg L -1 ) on gene expression in the echinoderm Paracentrotus lividus, including an up-regulation of the Abcb1 gene responsible for protection and multi-drug resistance (Shipp and Hamdoun, 2012).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Della Torre et al., 2014 source
- Not checked yetcites Shipp and Hamdoun, 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This persistence of MPs in mussel tissues represents a possible source of toxicity to their predators and potentially to humans (e.g.De Witte et al., 2014;Van Cauwenberghe and Janssen, 2014)”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites De Witte et al., 2014 source
- Not checked yetcites Van Cauwenberghe and Janssen, 2014
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Hurley et al. (2018) report maximum sediment concentrations of ~440,000 particles m -2 , and an average of 16,000 particles m -2 .”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hurley et al., 2018 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“and Paracyclopina nana (24 h; 0.05-6 μm; 0.1-20 mg L -1 ).”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.2. Ecotoxicological effects of MPs on aquatic organisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jeong et al., 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is also undeniable that a large number of organisms are exposed to these particles and that this exposure may cause a variety of effects and threaten individuals of many different species, the ecosystems they live in and, ultimately, humans.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 4. Conclusions and future perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Polyethylene and PS MPs are clearly the most studied type of polymers, although others, specifically PP, PES and PA, may represent a similar danger for aquatic life.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 4. Conclusions and future perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While it is difficult to demonstrate, it is possible that this lack of studies in the literature reflects a bias against publishing negative results.”
§ Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? > 3.2.3. Interactive ecotoxicological effects of MPs with other contaminants
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
The set of surveyed publications is representative of the available literature on MPs and aquatic organisms.
“The surveyed publications identified an equivalent number of studies conducted in the field (48%) and laboratory (52%) (Fig. 3A).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Molluscs include a large number of filter feeding species, with a high tendency for bioaccumulation.
“Molluscs include a large number of filter feeding species, with a high tendency for bioaccumulation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
These organism groups occupy a number of positions in aquatic food webs.
“These organism groups occupy a number of positions in aquatic food webs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the environment, organisms are simultaneously exposed to several contaminants.
“These studies are motivated by the situation found in the environment where organisms are simultaneously exposed to several contaminants.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Several of these organisms are widely used for food (e.g. M. edulis).
“Considering that several of these organisms are widely used for food (e.g.M. edulis)”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are many freshwater organisms with considerable trophic and commercial importance.
“Considering that there are many freshwater organisms with considerable trophic and commercial importance, this approach should be one of the directions that the study of MPs should take.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As reported by de Sá et al. [75], MPs can act as a carrier of pollutants in the marine food web.”
From Is Wild Marine Biota Affected by Microplastics? (2022) · cites this paper as [75]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
34 studies are not 12% of the stated total
MinorThe paper says it identified 612 studies. On that denominator, 34 studies are about 5.6%, not 12%; the text does not specify a different denominator for this claim.
Reported 12 · recomputed 5.555556
“Polyethylene was the most common type of MP studied in fish, it was reported in 34 studies, or 12% of the total number of studies identified.”
Interactive-study polymer percentages total 106%
MinorThe reported PE, PS, PVC and PP shares add to 106%, beyond rounding error. That conflicts with the paper's definition of a study by MP type, under which an article covering multiple types generates separate studies.
“Slightly more than half the studies (54%) were conducted using PE MPs.Polystyrene (29%), PVC (19%) and PP (4%) MPs were also reported.”
“A study was defined as a series of observations of one group of organisms, type of MPs, shape and/or size.Any article reporting data on more than one of the aforementioned categories generated a number of studies equal to the number of elements per premise.”
Citations
Cites
Microplastics in the marine environment
Andrady, A. L. (2011) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030 · Cited by 8,105
Lost at sea: where is all the plastic?
Thompson, R. C., Olsen, Y., Mitchell, R. P., Davis, A., Rowland, S. J., John, A. W. G., McGonigle, D., & Russell, A. E. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1094559 · Cited by 7,765
Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: A review
Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Halsband, C., & Galloway, T. S. (2011) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.09.025 · Cited by 6,023
Hidalgo-Ruz, V., Gutow, L., Thompson, R. C., & Thiel, M. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2031505 · Cited by 5,440
The Physical Impacts of Microplastics on Marine Organisms: A Review
Wright, S. L., Thompson, R. C., & Galloway, T. S. (2013) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2013.02.031 · Cited by 4,524
Horton, A. A., Walton, A., Spurgeon, D. J., Lahive, E., & Svendsen, C. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.190 · Cited by 3,756
Bergmann, M., Gutow, L., & Klages, M. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3 · Cited by 3,513
Plastics, the environment and human health: current consensus and future trends
Thompson, R. C., Moore, C. J., Saal, F. S. V., & Swan, S. H. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0053 · Cited by 3,069
Microplastic ingestion by zooplankton
Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Fileman, E., Halsband, C., Goodhead, R., Moger, J., & Galloway, T. S. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es400663f · Cited by 2,763
Auta, H. S., Emenike, C. U., & Fauziah, S. H. (2017) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.02.013 · Cited by 2,649
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 140 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,001
Preliminary indoor evidences of microplastic effects on freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates
Gallitelli, L., Cera, A., Cesarini, G., Pietrelli, L., & Scalici, M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-80606-5 · Cited by 58
Albano, M., Panarello, G., Paola, D. D., Capparucci, F., Crupi, R., Gugliandolo, E., Spanò, N., Capillo, G., & Savoca, S. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11083352 · Cited by 58
Wang, Q., Duan, X., Huang, F., Cheng, H., Zhang, C., Li, L., Ruan, X., He, Q., Yang, H., Niu, W., et al. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125918 · Cited by 58
Microplastic ingestion by the sandfish Holothuria scabra in Lampung and Sumbawa, Indonesia
Riani, E., & Cordova, M. R. (2021) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113134 · Cited by 65
A Review on Microplastics – An Indelible Ubiquitous Pollutant
(2022) · Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry · doi:10.33263/briac132.126 · Cited by 62
“These microplastics pose a great threat as they can change soil's biochemical and physical properties [87].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialReview on the ecotoxicological impacts of plastic pollution on the freshwater invertebrate Daphnia
Samadi, A., Kim, Y., Lee, S., Kim, Y. J., & Esterhuizen‐Londt, M. (2022) · Environmental Toxicology · doi:10.1002/tox.23623 · Cited by 60
“They disperse diversely in different area of the aquatic environment, and thus, a wide range of aquatic species are potentially susceptible to these contaminants.(2,56) The plastic pollution is most acute in marine environments, but it is now recognized that the problem TABLE 1 The types of plastics and common chemica…”
BackgroundInfluentialGoswami, P., Selvakumar, N., Verma, P. P., Saha, M., Suneel, V., Vinithkumar, N. V., Dharani, G., Rathore, C., & Nayak, J. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160876 · Cited by 62
Is Wild Marine Biota Affected by Microplastics?
Porcino, N., Bottari, T., & Mancuso, M. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani13010147 · Cited by 55
“[75], MPs can act as a carrier of pollutants in the marine food web.”
BackgroundBottari, T., Savoca, S., Mancuso, M., Capillo, G., Panarello, G., MartinaBonsignore, M., Crupi, R., Sanfilippo, M., D’Urso, L., Compagnini, G., et al. (2019) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.07.003 · Cited by 54
New frontiers in remediation of (micro)plastics
Silva, A. L. P. (2021) · Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.100443 · Cited by 54
Toxicity and biomarkers of micro-plastic in aquatic environment: a review
Suman, K. H., Haque, M. N., Uddin, M. J., Begum, M. S., & Sikder, M. H. (2020) · Biomarkers · doi:10.1080/1354750x.2020.1863470 · Cited by 53
Mohsen, M., Zhang, L., Sun, L., Lin, C., Wang, Q., Liu, S., Sun, J., & Yang, H. (2020) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111794 · Cited by 52
Fallon, B. R., & Freeman, C. J. (2021) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.11638 · Cited by 60
Drop-in fuel production with plastic waste pyrolysis oil over catalytic separation
Wang, S., Kim, H., Lee, D., Lee, Y., Won, Y., Hwang, B. W., Nam, H., Ryu, H.-J., & Lee, K.-H. (2021) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121440 · Cited by 53
Jin, X., Fu, X., Lu, W., & Wang, H. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159783 · Cited by 57
Xu, H., Wang, J., Wang, Q., Tu, W., & Jin, Y. (2023) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133051 · Cited by 52
Microplastics as Emerging Contaminants: Challenges in Inland Aquatic Food Web
Swain, P. R., Parida, P. K., Majhi, P., Behera, B. K., & Das, B. K. (2025) · Water · doi:10.3390/w17020201 · Cited by 58
Parolini, M., Felice, B. D., Gazzotti, S., Annunziata, L., Sugni, M., Bacchetta, R., & Ortenzi, M. A. (2020) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health · doi:10.1080/15287394.2020.1737852 · Cited by 54
“However, PET microparticles are one of the least used plastic polymers with respect to known MP effects toward marine organisms (de Sá et al. 2018).”
BackgroundWardlaw, C. M., & Prosser, R. S. (2020) · Water Air & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-020-04741-5 · Cited by 62
Steinman, A. D., Scott, J., Green, L. A., Partridge, C., Oudsema, M., Hassett, M. C., Kindervater, E., & Rediske, R. R. (2020) · Journal of Great Lakes Research · doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2020.07.012 · Cited by 55
Battaglia, F. M., Beckingham, B., & McFee, W. E. (2020) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111677 · Cited by 53
Micro-Nano Plastic in the Aquatic Environment: Methodological Problems and Challenges
Uddin, S., Fowler, S. W., Habibi, N., & Behbehani, M. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12030297 · Cited by 55
Sorption and desorption of organic UV filters onto microplastics in single and multi-solute systems
Ho, W.-K., & Leung, K. S. (2019) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113066 · Cited by 53
Inhibitory effects of polystyrene microplastics on caudal fin regeneration in zebrafish larvae
Gu, L., Tian, L., Gao, G. F., Peng, S. I., Zhang, J., Wu, D., Huang, J., Hua, Q., Lu, T., Li, Z., et al. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114664 · Cited by 51
Metal-doping of nanoplastics enables accurate assessment of uptake and effects on Gammarus pulex
Redondo‐Hasselerharm, P. E., Vink, G. J., Mitrano, D. M., & Koelmans, A. A. (2021) · Environmental Science Nano · doi:10.1039/d1en00068c · Cited by 57
Vega, G. C., Gross, A., & Birkved, M. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.07.008 · Cited by 54
Microplastic pollution in perch (Perca fluviatilis, Linnaeus 1758) from Italian south-alpine lakes
Galafassi, S., Sighicelli, M., Pusceddu, A., Bettinetti, R., Cau, A., Temperini, M. E., Gillibert, R., Ortolani, M., Pietrelli, L., Zaupa, S., et al. (2021) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117782 · Cited by 55
Kutralam-Muniasamy, G., Pérez‐Guevara, F., Elizalde, I., & Shruti, V. C. (2021) · Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.teac.2021.e00147 · Cited by 51
The adverse health effects of increasing microplastic pollution on aquatic mammals
Nabi, G., Ahmad, S., Ullah, S., Zada, S., Sarfraz, M., Guo, X., Khan, M. I., & Wanghe, K. (2022) · Journal of King Saud University - Science · doi:10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102006 · Cited by 55
Are Ingested or Inhaled Microplastics Involved in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease?
Auguet, T., Bertran, L., Barrientos‐Riosalido, A., Fabregat, B., Villar, B., Aguilar, C., & Sabench, F. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192013495 · Cited by 54
“In this line, the toxic effects of MPs have been investigated in numerous aquatic species and inflammation, genotoxicity, and oxidative stress responses have been described [15].”
BackgroundChristian, A. E., & Köper, I. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161083 · Cited by 54
Microplastic Contamination Has Limited Effects on Coral Fertilisation and Larvae
Berry, K., Epstein, H. E., Lewis, P. J., Hall, N., & Negri, A. P. (2019) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d11120228 · Cited by 51
Hiltunen, M., Vehniäinen, E., & Kukkonen, J. V. K. (2020) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.110304 · Cited by 54
Maritime ports and beach management as sources of coastal macro-, meso-, and microplastic pollution
Masiá, P., Ardura, A., Gaitán, M., Gerber, S., Rayón-Viña, F., & García‐Vázquez, E. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-12821-0 · Cited by 55
Urban-Malinga, B., Jakubowska, M., & Białowąs, M. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144302 · Cited by 52
Not as Bad as It Seems? A Literature Review on the Case of Microplastic Uptake in Fish
Müller, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.672768 · Cited by 55
“…the group of organisms potentially affected by MP ingestion which are most intensively investigated both in the field and in laboratory set-ups (de Sá et al., 2018), the aim of this study is three-fold: 1. it will provide a brief quantitative and qualitative summary of the fish taxa examined…”
BackgroundChallenges and Opportunities for Recycled Polyethylene Fishing Nets: Towards a Circular Economy
Juan, R., Domínguez, C., Robledo, N., Paredes, B., Galera, S., & García‐Muñoz, R. A. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13183155 · Cited by 52
From city to sea: Spatiotemporal dynamics of floating macrolitter in the Tiber River
Cesarini, G., Crosti, R., Secco, S., Gallitelli, L., & Scalici, M. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159713 · Cited by 50
Sohail, M., Urooj, Z., Noreen, S., Baig, M. M. F. A., Zhang, X., & Li, B. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164596 · Cited by 57
Pietra, A. L., Fasciolo, G., Lucariello, D., Motta, C. M., Venditti, P., & Ferrandino, I. (2024) · Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.etap.2024.104371 · Cited by 43
Parolini, M., Ferrario, C., Felice, B. D., Gazzotti, S., Bonasoro, F., Carnevali, C., Ortenzi, M. A., & Sugni, M. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122848 · Cited by 51
Zhang, Z., Zou, S., & Li, P. (2023) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122926 · Cited by 51
Mitochondria as a target of micro- and nanoplastic toxicity
Dal, F., & Ahbab, M. A. (2024) · Cambridge Prisms Plastics · doi:10.1017/plc.2024.6 · Cited by 56
“In aquatic organisms, MPs have been shown to cause oxidative stress, genotoxicity, neurotoxicity, developmental delay, reduced reproductive success, and death (De Sá et al., 2018).”
Khanna, R., Chandra, A. P., Sen, S., Konyukhov, Y., Fuentes, E., Burmistrov, I. N., & Kravchenko, M. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16198704 · Cited by 53
A multidisciplinary perspective on the role of plastic pollution in the triple planetary crisis
Schmidt, C., Kühnel, D., Materić, D., Stubenrauch, J., Schubert, K. A., Luo, A., Wendt‐Potthoff, K., & Jahnke, A. (2024) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2024.109059 · Cited by 57
Guimarães, A. T. B., Rodrigues, A. S. D. L., Pereira, P. S., Silva, F. G., & Malafaia, G. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141936 · Cited by 49
RetractedAhmed, Y. H., El‐Naggar, M. E., Rashad, M. M., Youssef, A. M., Galal, M. K., & Bashir, D. W. (2022) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/s00441-022-03581-5 · Cited by 50
Zhang, Y., Yang, B., Zhang, C., Xu, S., & Sun, P. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157772 · Cited by 51
The impact of microplastics on female reproduction and early life
Yang, J., Kamstra, J. H., Legler, J., & Aardema, H. (2023) · Animal Reproduction · doi:10.1590/1984-3143-ar2023-0037 · Cited by 51
“Currently, MNPs and plastic contaminants have been detected in a wide range of different species, with a primary focus on aquatic species, including zooplankton, amphipods, worms, molluscs, fish, sea birds, and whales (Sá et al., 2018).”
BackgroundWhat are the global patterns of microplastic ingestion by fish? A scientometric review
Sacco, V. A., Zuanazzi, N. R., Selinger, A., da Costa, J. H. A., Lemunie, É. S., Comelli, C. L., Abilhôa, V., de Sousa, F. C., Fávaro, L. F., Mendoza, L. M. R., et al. (2024) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123972 · Cited by 55
Peng, Y., & Qi, H. (2024) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116505 · Cited by 51
Gambino, G., Falleni, A., Nigro, M., Salvetti, A., Cecchettini, A., Ippolito, C., Guidi, P., & Rossi, L. (2019) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2019.105354 · Cited by 48
Bhattacharya, A., & Khare, S. K. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part C · doi:10.1080/10590501.2019.1699379 · Cited by 49
Plasticizers as Microplastics Tracers in Tunisian Marine Environment
Gugliandolo, E., Licata, P., Crupi, R., Albergamo, A., Jebara, A., Turco, V. L., Potortì, A. G., Mansour, H. B., Cuzzocrea, S., & Bella, G. D. (2020) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.589398 · Cited by 47
Zhao, X., Sun, J., Zhou, L., Teng, M., Zhao, L., Li, Y., & Wu, F. (2023) · Environmental Science Nano · doi:10.1039/d3en00491k · Cited by 49
Yu, S.-P., & Chan, B. K. K. (2020) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110362 · Cited by 47
Nel, H., Smith, G. H. S., Harmer, R., Sykes, R., Schneidewind, U., Lynch, I., & Krause, S. (2020) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111776 · Cited by 52
Opitz, T., Benítez, S., Fernández, C., Osores, S., Navarro, J. M., Rodríguez‐Romero, A., Lohrmann, K. B., & Lardies, M. A. (2020) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111834 · Cited by 48
Micro and Nano-Plastics in the Environment: Research Priorities for the Near Future
Vighi, M., Bayo, J., Fernández‐Piñas, F., Gago, J., Gómez, M., Hernández‐Borges, J., Herrera, A., Landaburu‐Aguirre, J., Muniategui‐Lorenzo, S., Muñoz, A., et al. (2021) · Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/398_2021_69 · Cited by 53
Riverine microplastics and their interaction with freshwater fish
Sulaiman, B., Woodward, J. C., & Shiels, H. A. (2023) · Water Biology and Security · doi:10.1016/j.watbs.2023.100192 · Cited by 50
Kumar, M., Naik, D. K., Maharana, D., Das, M., Jaiswal, E., Naik, A. S., & Kumari, N. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169707 · Cited by 46
Microplastics Removal from a Plastic Recycling Industrial Wastewater Using Sand Filtration
Umar, M., Singdahl-Larsen, C., & Ranneklev, S. B. (2023) · Water · doi:10.3390/w15050896 · Cited by 45
The growing threats and mitigation of environmental microplastics
Bamigboye, O., Alfred, M. O., Bayode, A. A., Unuabonah, E. I., & Omorogie, M. O. (2024) · Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1016/j.enceco.2024.07.001 · Cited by 47
Le, V., Nguyen, M., Ngo, H. H., Barceló, ., Nguyen, H., Um, M., & Nguyen, D. (2024) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.117168 · Cited by 47
Eder, M. L., Oliva-Teles, L., Pinto, R., Carvalho, A. P., Almeida, C. M. R., Hornek-Gausterer, R., & Guimarães, L. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125980 · Cited by 46
Polystyrene nanoplastics enhance the toxicological effects of DDE in zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae
Varshney, S., Gora, A. H., Kiron, V., Siriyappagouder, P., Dahle, D., Kögel, T., Ørnsrud, R., & Olsvik, P. A. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160457 · Cited by 46
Kittner, M., Eisentraut, P., Dittmann, D., & Braun, U. (2023) · Applied Research · doi:10.1002/appl.202200089 · Cited by 44
Ye, J., Qiu, W., Pang, X., Su, Y., Zhang, X., Huang, J., Xie, H., Liao, J., Tang, Z., Chen, Z., et al. (2024) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123713 · Cited by 49
Hildebrandt, L., von der Au, M., Zimmermann, T., Reese, A., Ludwig, J., & Pröfrock, D. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236120 · Cited by 45
Liu, L., Sun, Y., Kleinmeyer, Z., Habil, G., Yang, Q., Zhao, L., & Rosso, D. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156697 · Cited by 44
Advancing biological processing for valorization of plastic wastes
Gluth, A., Xu, Z., Fifield, L. S., & Yang, B. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112966 · Cited by 42
Rehman, A., Huang, F.-Y., Zhang, Z., Habumugisha, T., Yan, C., Shaheen, U., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2024.108713 · Cited by 43
Zjačić, J. P., Katančić, Z., Kovačić, M., Kušić, H., Hrnjak‐Murgić, Z., Dionysiou, D. D., Karamanis, P., & Božić, A. L. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173344 · Cited by 42
Jakubowska, M., Białowąs, M., Stankevičiūtė, M., Chomiczewska, A., Jonko-Sobuś, K., Pažusienė, J., Hallmann, A., Bučaitė, A., & Urban-Malinga, B. (2021) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151909 · Cited by 44
Alak, G., Köktürk, M., & Atamanalp, M. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126573 · Cited by 42
Kurki‐Fox, J. J., Doll, B. A., Monteleone, B., West, K., Putnam, G., Kelleher, L., Krause, S., & Schneidewind, U. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162940 · Cited by 42
Bhattacharjee, U., Baruah, K. N., & Shah, M. P. (2025) · Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1016/j.enceco.2025.02.010 · Cited by 42
Natural history matters: Plastics in estuarine fish and sediments at the mouth of an urban watershed
Talley, T. S., Venuti, N. E., & Whelan, R. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229777 · Cited by 43
“Consumption of plastics may reduce overall food intake, and therefore fitness, and may cause physical damage to an organism’s digestive tract [15,17].”
BackgroundInfluentialInsights into nanoplastics effects on human health
Teles, M., Balasch, J. C., Oliveira, M., Sardans, J., & Peñuelas, J. (2020) · 中国科学通报：英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2020.08.003 · Cited by 44
Self-citationGastrointestinal tissue as a “new” target of pollution exposure
Pambianchi, E., Pecorelli, A., & Valacchi, G. (2021) · IUBMB Life · doi:10.1002/iub.2530 · Cited by 45
Pérez‐Guevara, F., Roy, P. D., Kutralam-Muniasamy, G., & Shruti, V. C. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances · doi:10.1016/j.hazadv.2021.100021 · Cited by 44
Unraveling Physical and Chemical Effects of Textile Microfibers
Athey, S. N., Almroth, B. C., Granek, E. F., Hurst, P., Tissot, A. G., & Weis, J. S. (2022) · Water · doi:10.3390/w14233797 · Cited by 46
dos Santos, C. R., Drumond, G. P., Moreira, V. R., Santos, L. V. D. S., & Amaral, M. C. S. (2023) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2023.144936 · Cited by 46
Ge, X., Xu, F., Li, B., Liu, L., Lu, X., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Li, J., Li, J., & Tang, Y. (2023) · Environmental Science and Ecotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.ese.2023.100340 · Cited by 41
“Additionally, the toxic effects of MPs on marine organisms in the bottom water and sediment, especially for the bottom dwellers, have been widely reported [3,4].”
BackgroundMicroplastics distribution and potential health implications of food and food products
Ansar, S. S., Balasubramanian, B., Chaudhary, A., Pushparaj, K., Gopalakrishnan, N. K., Kamyab, H., Chelliapan, S., & Pappuswamy, M. (2024) · Journal of Food Composition and Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2024.107098 · Cited by 41
Kumar, P., Lata, K., Gacem, A., Tariq, M., Singh, S., Sharma, A., Yadav, V. K., Bhutto, J. K., Kumar, M., Alreshidi, M. A., et al. (2025) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-025-01164-z · Cited by 49
Transcriptome alterations in zebrafish gill after exposure to different sizes of microplastics
Xue, Y., Jia, T., Yang, N., Sun, Z., Xu, Z., Wen, X.-L., & Feng, L. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A · doi:10.1080/10934529.2022.2064668 · Cited by 43
Marchant, D. J., Martínez Rodríguez, A., Francelle, P., Jones, J. I., & Kratina, P. (2023) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114834 · Cited by 40
Khoshmanesh, M., Sanati, A. M., Shahcheragh, S., Farjadfard, S., Bonyadi, Z., & Ramavandi, B. (2024) · Arabian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2024.105737 · Cited by 40
Angnunavuri, P. N., Attiogbe, F. K., & Mensah, B. (2020) · Scientific African · doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00546 · Cited by 38
Soares, J., Miguel, I., Venâncio, C., Lopes, I., & Oliveira, M. (2020) · Water · doi:10.3390/w12113208 · Cited by 30
Self-citationWu, M., Jiang, Y., Kwong, R. W. M., Brar, S. K., Zhong, H., & Ji, R. (2021) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116959 · Cited by 43
Phothakwanpracha, J., Lirdwitayaprasit, T., & Pairohakul, S. (2021) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112954 · Cited by 40
Mediated food and hydrodynamics on the ingestion of microplastics by Daphnia magna
Colomer, J., Müller, M. F., Barcelona, A., & Serra, T. (2019) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.034 · Cited by 39
Evaluation of microplastic pollution in a lotic ecosystem and its ecological risk
Shukur, S. A., Hassan, F. M., Fakhry, S. S., Ameén, F., & Stephenson, S. L. (2023) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115401 · Cited by 43
Do nanoplastics impact the ability of the polychaeta Hediste diversicolor to regenerate?
Silva, M. S. S., Oliveira, M., Lopéz, D., Martins, M. A., Figueira, E. M. D. A. P., & Pires, A. (2019) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105921 · Cited by 39
Self-citationEcotoxicological Impacts of Micro- and Nanoplastics in Terrestrial and Aquatic Environments
Gomes, T., Bour, A., Coutris, C., Almeida, A. C., Bråte, I. L. N., Wolf, R. L., Bank, M. S., & Lusher, A. (2021) · Environmental contamination remediation and management · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78627-4_7 · Cited by 41
Piccardo, M., Bertoli, M., Pastorino, P., Barceló, ., Provenza, F., Lesa, D., Anselmi, S., Elia, A. C., Prearo, M., Pizzul, E., et al. (2021) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics9100256 · Cited by 40
Interaction of microplastics with metal(oid)s in aquatic environments: What is done so far?
Rodrigues, J. P., Duarte, A. C., & Santos-Echeandía, J. (2022) · Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances · doi:10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100072 · Cited by 41
Almas, F. F., Bezirci, G., Çağan, A. S., Gökdağ, K., Çırak, T., Kankılıç, G. B., Paçal, E., & Tavşanoğlu, Ü. N. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135007 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- de Sá, L. C., Oliveira, M., Ribeiro, F., Rocha, T. L., & Futter, M. N.
- Affiliations
- Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar (PT)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Futter, Martyn Norman
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 645
- Pages
- 1029-1039
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2883238699
- Semantic Scholar
- b9222c4f4ecd7e923efa6319e707a47b84633bce
- Cited by
- 1,316
- References
- 140
- Citations by year
- 2026: 80 · 2025: 150 · 2024: 179 · 2023: 189 · 2022: 214 · 2021: 207 · 2020: 205 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Swedish Research Council FORMAS (2017-00029)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Keywords
- microplastics, aquatic organisms, microplastic ingestion, ecotoxicology, polymer types, particle size and shape, microfibers, microplastic fragments, fish, invertebrates, mechanism of action, environmental exposure
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Environmental Monitoring, Plastics, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Ecotoxicology, Aquatic Organisms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
