Cited by 63Menstrual Health and DisordersSleep and related disordersMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Sleep quality and the menstrual cycle

Romans, Sarah E., Kreindler, David, Einstein, Gillian, Laredo, Sheila, Petrovic, Michele J., Stanley, James·2015·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to assess the temporal relationship of subjective sleep quality to menstrual cycle phase in a community (non help-seeking) sample of adult women over six months. Previous work has produced contradictory results and often used student samples.Participants/methods Patients/methods This was a cohort study, using daily electronic data collection in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario, Canada; 76 women aged 18-42 years recruited by random digit telephone dialing, recorded mood, sleep quality, and other health variables on a daily basis for 24 weeks.Results Using linear mixed models, we assessed the relationship between subjective sleep quality and three menstrual cycle phases (menses, premenstrual and midcycle) over 395 cycles. Premenstrual sleep quality was poorer than during the rest of the cycle, with a mean difference of 1.32 between premenstrual and midcycle reference phase, on a 1-100 quality scale (higher score denotes poorer quality). This difference held when the independent variables of daily exercise and physical health were added to the model; it became non-significant when perceived stress and later, social support were also added to the model.Conclusions Sleep quality in adult non-help seeking women is statistically poorer in the premenstruum but the size of the difference is of little clinical significance and was no longer statistically significant with inclusion of the potentially confounding variables, perceived stress and social support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.12.001

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Romans, S. E., Kreindler, D., Einstein, G., Laredo, S., Petrovic, M. J., & Stanley, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
Corresponding author
Romans, Sarah E.
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
489-495
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036252095
Cited by
63
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
sleep quality, menstrual cycle, premenstrual phase, women's health, perceived stress, social support, mood
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Menstrual Cycle, Menstruation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Cohort Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review