Cited by 130Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

Does health predict the reporting of racial discrimination or do reports of discrimination predict health? Findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Youth

Gee, Gilbert, Walsemann, Katrina·2009·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Racial discrimination may contribute to diminished well-being, possibly through stress and restricted economic advancement. Our study examines whether reports of racial discrimination predict health problems, and whether health problems predict the reporting of racial discrimination. Data come from years 1979 to 1983 of the US National Longitudinal Study of Youth, focusing on respondents of Black (n=1851), Hispanic (n=1170), White (n=3450) and other (n=1387) descent. Our analyses indicate that reports of racial discrimination in seeking employment predict health-related work limitations, although these limitations develop over time, and not immediately. We also find that reports of discrimination at two time-points appear more strongly related to health-related work limitations than reports at one time-point. A key finding is that these limitations do not predict the subsequent reporting of racial discrimination in seeking employment. These findings inform our knowledge of the temporal ordering of racial discrimination in seeking employment and health-related work conditions among young adults. The findings also indicate that future research should carefully attend to the patterns and timing of discrimination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.02.002

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gee, G., & Walsemann, K.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Gee, Gilbert
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
68
Issue
9
Pages
1676-1684
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087257659
Cited by
130
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
FWCI
36.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
racial discrimination, employment discrimination, young adults, Black youth, Latino youth, racial disparities in health, stress and health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Black or African American, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Prejudice, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, United States, Chi-Square Distribution, Occupational Health, White People, Health Status Disparities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review