The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,366
Social Theory and Social Structure
Ross, E. J., & Merton, R. K. (1958) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3709394 · Cited by 10,315
(1951) · Cited by 8,693
Geels, F. W. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 · Cited by 7,275
Social Theory and Social Structure.
Bock, K. E., & Merton, R. K. (1969) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091967 · Cited by 6,660
An evolutionary theory of economic change
Winter, & Sidney, G. (1982) · Cited by 6,323
National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning
(2010) · Anthem Press eBooks · doi:10.7135/upo9781843318903 · Cited by 6,032
National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning
Johnson, B. (1992) · Cited by 3,775
Technology policy and economic performance, lessons from Japan
(1988) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(88)90131-8 · Cited by 3,580
An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein
Sabatier, P. A. (1988) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf00136406 · Cited by 3,570
Cited by
The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms
Geels, F. W. (2011) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 · Cited by 3,092
An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., et al. (2019) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,800
Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda
Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007 · Cited by 2,469
Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003 · Cited by 2,269
Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: an extended concept and framework for analysis
Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004 · Cited by 1,524
Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change
Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340 · Cited by 1,401
Sovacool, B. K., Axsen, J., & Sorrell, S. (2018) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.007 · Cited by 1,092
Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change
Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015 · Cited by 1,077
Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions
Meadowcroft, J. (2011) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003 · Cited by 868
Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-actor Perspective
Avelino, F., & Wittmayer, J. M. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2015.1112259 · Cited by 838
Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems
Malecki, E. J. (2018) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/gec3.12359 · Cited by 784
Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources
Farla, J., Markard, J., Raven, R., & Coenen, L. (2012) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001 · Cited by 708
Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2009) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001 · Cited by 674
Global Innovation Systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts
Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2017) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012 · Cited by 639
Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., Jacobsson, S., Markard, J., Sandén, B., & Truffer, B. (2015) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.003 · Cited by 627
Self-citationWieczorek, A. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2012) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scr008 · Cited by 559
Self-citationJacobsson, S., & Bergek, A. (2011) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.006 · Cited by 558
Circular economy in the building and construction sector: a scientific evolution analysis
Norouzi, M., Chàfer, M., Cabeza, L. F., Jiménez, L., & Boer, D. (2021) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102704 · Cited by 482
Rethinking Communication in Innovation Processes: Creating Space for Change in Complex Systems
Leeuwis, C., & Aarts, N. (2011) · The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension · doi:10.1080/1389224x.2011.536344 · Cited by 450
“Green growth”: From a growing eco-industry to economic sustainability
Jänicke, M. (2012) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.045 · Cited by 437
Fuenfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.023 · Cited by 408
The roles of users in shaping transitions to new energy systems
Schot, J., Kanger, L., & Verbong, G. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.54 · Cited by 375
The systemic impact of a transition fuel: Does natural gas help or hinder the energy transition?
Gürsan, C., & de Gooyert, V. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110552 · Cited by 364
Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling
Nemet, G. F., Callaghan, M. W., Creutzig, F., Fuss, S., Hartmann, J., Hilaire, J., Lamb, W. F., Minx, J. C., Rogers, S., & Smith, P. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aabff4 · Cited by 343
Rogge, K. S., Schneider, M., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.032 · Cited by 351
Innovation and technology transfer through global value chains: Evidence from China's PV industry
Zhang, F., & Gallagher, K. S. (2016) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.014 · Cited by 319
Institutional dynamics and technology legitimacy – A framework and a case study on biogas technology
Markard, J., Wirth, S., & Truffer, B. (2016) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.009 · Cited by 313
The Energy Technology Innovation System
Gallagher, K. S., Grübler, A., Kuhl, L., Nemet, G., & Wilson, C. (2012) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-060311-133915 · Cited by 309
The life cycle of technological innovation systems
Markard, J. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.045 · Cited by 308
Suurs, R. A. A., & Hekkert, M. P. (2009) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2009.03.002 · Cited by 305
Self-citationFear and loathing of electric vehicles: The reactionary rhetoric of range anxiety
Noel, L., Zarazua de Rubens, G., Sovacool, B. K., & Kester, J. (2019) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.001 · Cited by 282
Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion—A functional analysis
Negro, S. O., Hekkert, M. P., & Smits, R. E. (2007) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.01.027 · Cited by 278
Self-citationRaven, R., Kern, F., Verhees, B., & Smith, A. (2016) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.002 · Cited by 277
The technological innovation systems framework: Response to six criticisms
Markard, J., Hekkert, M., & Jacobsson, S. (2015) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.006 · Cited by 277
Self-citationA review of socio-technical energy transition (STET) models
Li, F. G. N., Trutnevyte, E., & Strachan, N. (2015) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.017 · Cited by 277
Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation
Edler, J., & Yeow, J. (2016) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.010 · Cited by 265
Entrepreneurial resilience: a biographical analysis of successful entrepreneurs
Duchek, S. (2018) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-017-0467-2 · Cited by 265
Grubb, M., Drummond, P., Poncia, A., McDowall, W., Popp, D., Samadi, S., Penasco, C., Gillingham, K. T., Smulders, S., Glachant, M., et al. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abde07 · Cited by 173
Hannon, M. J., Foxon, T. J., & Gale, W. F. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.009 · Cited by 173
Ingram, J. (2015) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.003 · Cited by 172
Scale dynamics of grassroots innovations through parallel pathways of transformative change
Hermans, F., Roep, D., & Klerkx, L. (2016) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.011 · Cited by 155
Mas-Tur, A., Roig-Tierno, N., Sarin, S., Haon, C., Sego, T., Belkhouja, M., Porter, A., & Merigó, J. M. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120487 · Cited by 147
van Leeuwen, K., de Vries, E., Koop, S., & Roest, K. (2018) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-018-0995-8 · Cited by 143
Agricultural transition: Niche and regime knowledge systems’ boundary dynamics
Ingram, J. (2018) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.05.001 · Cited by 134
Wesseling, J. H., Niesten, E. M. M. I., Faber, J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2015) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1834 · Cited by 128
Self-citationResearch on agro-food sustainability transitions: Where are food security and nutrition?
El Bilali, H. (2019) · Food Security · doi:10.1007/s12571-019-00922-1 · Cited by 110
Gong, H., & Hansen, T. (2023) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2022.100689 · Cited by 94
A social network analysis of Germany’s wood-based bioeconomy: Social capital and shared beliefs
Giurca, A., & Metz, T. (2018) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.09.001 · Cited by 80
Grubb, M., McDowall, W., & Drummond, P. (2017) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.016 · Cited by 73
Collective institutional work: The case of Airbnb in Amsterdam, London and New York
Boon, W. P. C., Spruit, K., & Frenken, K. (2019) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662716.2019.1633279 · Cited by 55
Andreoni, A. (2018) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/bey037 · Cited by 53
Ren, M. (2019) · The Journal of Chinese Sociology · doi:10.1186/s40711-019-0109-x · Cited by 42
Kirwan, A. (2024) · Irish Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03323315.2023.2284901 · Cited by 29
Committed to implementing CCU? A comparison of the policy mix in the US and the EU
Thielges, S., Olfe-Kräutlein, B., Rees, A., Jahn, J., Sick, V., & Quitzow, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2022.943387 · Cited by 29
Andersson, J., Hojcková, K., & Sandén, B. A. (2023) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2023.100786 · Cited by 23
Non-disruptive regime changes—The case of competing energy efficient lighting trajectories
Franceschini, S., & Alkemade, F. (2016) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2016.04.003 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 413-432
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999997471
- Cited by
- 2,741
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 32.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.