Cited by 338Marine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Maintenance of ancestral complexity and non-metazoan genes in two basal cnidarians

Technau, Ulrich, Rudd, Stephen, Maxwell, Peter, Gordon, Paul M.K., Saina, Michael, Grasso, Lauretta C., Hayward, David C., Sensen, Christoph W. +4 more·2005·Trends in Genetics

Abstract

Cnidarians are among the simplest extant animals; however EST analyses reveal that they have a remarkably high level of genetic complexity. In this article, we show that the full diversity of metazoan signaling pathways is represented in this phylum, as are antagonists previously known only in chordates. Many of the cnidarian ESTs match genes previously known only in non-animal kingdoms. At least some of these represent ancient genes lost by all bilaterians examined so far, rather than genes gained by recent lateral gene transfer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tig.2005.09.007

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nematostella vectensis has a surprisingly complex genome, including all major signalling pathways and most transcription factor families.

    “Nematostella has a surprisingly complex genome, including all major signalling pathways and most transcription factor families [18,20–24].”
  • Caenorhabditis and Drosophila are highly diverged organisms with high levels of gene loss and sequence divergence, whereas at least some cnidarians have retained much of the ancestral genetic complexity of metazoans.

    “diverged organisms characterized by high levels of gene loss and sequence divergence, whereas at least some cnidarians have retained much of the ancestral genetic complexity of metazoans [108–110].”

    From Back to the Basics: Cnidarians Start to Fire (2017) · cites this paper as [109]

  • Cnidarian genes are often more similar to vertebrate genes than vertebrate genes are to those of more diverged animals such as Caenorhabditis or Drosophila.

    “Reflecting this ancestral core, cnidarian genes are often more similar to vertebrate genes than vertebrate genes are to those of more diverged animals like Caenorhabditis or Drosophila [50,109].”

    From Back to the Basics: Cnidarians Start to Fire (2017) · cites this paper as [109]

  • The anemone genome harbors two families of Tx1-like non-LTR retrotransposons, Tx1-1_NV and Tx1-2_NV, inserted in 5S rRNA and U2 smRNA, respectively, at target sites identical to those of different Tx1 elements in fish, frog, and lancelet.

    “the anemone genome harbors two families of Tx1-like non-LTR retrotransposons, Tx1-1_NV and Tx1-2_NV, inserted in 5S rRNA and U2 smRNA, respectively, at target sites identical to those of different Tx1 elements in fish (18), frog and lancelet.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Technau, U., Rudd, S., Maxwell, P., Gordon, P. M. K., Saina, M., Grasso, L. C., Hayward, D. C., Sensen, C. W., Saint, R., Holstein, T. W., Ball, E. E., & Miller, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • Turku Centre for Biotechnology (FI)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • James Cook University (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Technau, Ulrich
  • Miller, David J.
Venue
Trends in Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-12
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
633-639
ISSN
0168-9525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076271968
Cited by
337
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 19
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
ancestral genes, gene loss, horizontal gene transfer, expressed sequence tags, gene family evolution, bilaterians
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacterial Proteins, Genetics, Population, Heat-Shock Proteins, Humans, Phylogeny, Genes, Duplicate, Anthozoa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review