Cited by 504Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Endometriosis in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) following chronic exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

Rier, S·1993·Fundamental and Applied Toxicology

Abstract

The incidence of the reproductive disease endometriosis was determined in a colony of rhesus monkeys chronically exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD or dioxin) for a period of 4 years. Ten years after termination of dioxin treatment, the presence of endometriosis was documented by surgical laparoscopy and the severity of disease was assessed. The incidence of endometriosis was directly correlated with dioxin exposure and the severity of disease was dependent upon the dose administered (p < 0.001). Three of 7 animals exposed to 5 ppt dioxin (43%) and 5 of 7 animals exposed to 25 ppt dioxin (71%) had moderate to severe endometriosis. In contrast, the frequency of disease in the control group was 33%, similar to an overall prevalence of 30% in 304 rhesus monkeys housed at The Harlow Primate Center with no dioxin exposure. This 15-year study indicates that latent female reproductive abnormalities may be associated with dioxin exposure in the rhesus. Therefore, the effects of this toxin may be more diverse than previously recognized.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/faat.1993.1119

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is unclear whether baboons are a useful model, because deep endometriosis has not been observed in nonhuman primates except after dioxin administration.

    “First, it is unclear whether baboons are a useful model, because deep endometriosis has not been observed in nonhuman primates except after dioxin administration (252);”

    From Pathogenesis of endometriosis: The genetic/epigenetic theory (2019) · cites this paper as [252]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rier, S.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rier, S
ORCID
Rier, S
Venue
Fundamental and Applied Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-11
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
433-441
ISSN
0272-0590 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121492292
Cited by
502
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 19
FWCI
13.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Fundamental and Applied Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
endometriosis, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, dioxins, rhesus monkeys, long-term exposure, dose-response relationship, endometriosis severity, chronic toxicity
MeSH terms
Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins, Animals, Endometriosis, Female, Macaca mulatta, Monkey Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review