Cited by 169Physical Activity and HealthSports and Physical Education StudiesRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management

Relationship between physical activity and general mental health

Kim, Yeon Soo, Park, Yoon Soo, Allegrante, John P., Marks, Ray, Ok, Haean, Ok Cho, Kang, Garber, Carol Ewing·2012·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Purpose We investigated the relationship between physical activity and mental health and determined the optimal amount of physical activity associated with better mental health.Method Self-reported data from a national random sample of 7674 adult respondents collected during the 2008 U.S. Health Information National Trends 2007 Survey (HINTS) were analyzed in 2012. Mental health was plotted against the number of hours of physical activity per week using a fractional 2-degree polynomial function. Demographic and physical health factors related to poorer mental health were examined. The optimal range of physical activity associated with poorer mental health was examined by age, gender, and physical health.Results A curvilinear association was observed between physical activity and general mental health. The optimal threshold volume for mental health benefits was of 2.5 to 7.5h of weekly physical activity. The associations varied by gender, age, and physical health status. Individuals who engaged in the optimal amount of physical activity were more likely to have reported better mental health (odds ratio=1.39, p=0.006).Conclusions This study established a hyperbolic dose-response relationship between physical activity and general mental health, with an optimal range of 2.5 to 7.5h of physical activity per week.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.08.021

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, Y. S., Park, Y. S., Allegrante, J. P., Marks, R., Ok, H., Ok Cho, K., & Garber, C. E.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • York College, City University of New York (US)
  • Mokwon University (KR)
Corresponding author
Garber, Carol Ewing
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
55
Issue
5
Pages
458-463
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003119406
Cited by
169
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Keywords
physical activity, mental health, dose-response relationship, curvilinear relationship, gender differences, age differences, physical health status, United States adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, United States, Exercise, Confidence Intervals, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review