The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue
Abstract
The ability to determine trabecular bone tissue elastic and failure properties has biological and clinical importance. To date, trabecular tissue yield strains remain unknown due to experimental difficulties, and elastic moduli studies have reported controversial results. We hypothesized that the elastic and tensile and compressive yield properties of trabecular tissue are similar to those of cortical tissue. Effective tissue modulus and yield strains were calibrated for cadaveric human femoral neck specimens taken from 11 donors, using a combination of apparent-level mechanical testing and specimen-specific, high-resolution, nonlinear finite element modeling. The trabecular tissue properties were then compared to measured elastic modulus and tensile yield strain of human femoral diaphyseal cortical bone specimens obtained from a similar cohort of 34 donors. Cortical tissue properties were obtained by statistically eliminating the effects of vascular porosity. Results indicated that mean elastic modulus was 10% lower (p<0.05) for the trabecular tissue (18.0+/-2.8 GPa) than for the cortical tissue (19.9+/-1.8 GPa), and the 0.2% offset tensile yield strain was 15% lower for the trabecular tissue (0.62+/-0.04% vs. 0.73+/-0.05%, p<0.001). The tensile-compressive yield strength asymmetry for the trabecular tissue, 0.62 on average, was similar to values reported in the literature for cortical bone. We conclude that while the elastic modulus and yield strains for trabecular tissue are just slightly lower than those of cortical tissue, because of the cumulative effect of these differences, tissue strength is about 25% greater for cortical bone.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Results from this approach place the elastic modulus of human trabecular tissue at approximately 10% less, tensile yield strain at 15% less, and tensile/compressive tissue strength at 25% less than that of cortical bone (142).”
From Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States (2018) · cites this paper as [142]
Citations
Cites
The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue
Reilly, D. T., & Burstein, A. H. (1975) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(75)90075-5 · Cited by 1,533
Cowin, S. C. (2001) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b14263 · Cited by 1,456
Zysset, P. K., Guo, X.-D. E., Hoffler, C. E., Moore, K. E., & Goldstein, S. A. (1999) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00111-6 · Cited by 1,001
The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone
Gibson, L. J. (1985) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(85)90287-8 · Cited by 932
Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation
Rho, J.-Y., Tsui, T. Y., & Pharr, G. M. (1997) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00073-2 · Cited by 924
van Rietbergen, B., Weinans, H., Huiskes, R., & Odgaard, A. (1995) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(95)80008-5 · Cited by 865
Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site
Morgan, E. F., & Keaveny, T. M. (2001) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00011-2 · Cited by 705
Self-citationAging of bone tissue: mechanical properties.
Burstein, A. H., Reilly, D. T., & Martens, M. A. (1976) · PubMed · Cited by 614
Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties
Burstein, A., Reilly, D., & Martens, M. (1976) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-197658010-00015 · Cited by 569
Turner, C. H., Rho, J., Takano, Y., Tsui, T. Y., & Pharr, G. M. (1999) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00177-8 · Cited by 547
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,000
Sacher, S. E., Hernandez, C. J., & Donnelly, E. L. (2021) · Advanced Engineering Materials · doi:10.1002/adem.202100206 · Cited by 1
Sang, Z., Ren, Z., Yu, J., Wang, Y., & Liao, H. (2024) · Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101938 · Cited by 1
Anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of basivertebral foramen and its clinical significance
Li, S., & Zhao, X. (2024) · Journal of Zhejiang University (Medical Sciences) · doi:10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0220 · Cited by 2
Nakashima, A., Fujii, H., Kuroda, M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13247652 · Cited by 1
“Research on osteoporosis in RA has mainly focused on generalized bone loss, with less attention to localized loss, seen as cortical reduction around the joints [6,7].”
Noordin, M. A., Yusop, A. H. M., Syahrom, A., et al. (2024) · Journal of Bionic Engineering · doi:10.1007/s42235-024-00628-x · Cited by 1
Development of a peak insertion torque prediction model for parallel-walled dental implants
Alsheghri, A., Abdalla, A. N., Mokahhal, B., Cortes, A. R. G., Torres, J., Viñuela, A. C., Cascos, R., Song, J. H., & Tamimi, F. (2025) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2025.104318 · Cited by 2
Rokoui, A., Saeedzadeh, M., Hosseini, S. A., et al. (2025) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1080/10255842.2025.2511224 · Cited by 1
Li, L., Deng, P., Hou, S., Li, G., Suo, M., Xu, L., Wang, C., & Song, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2025.1661054 · Cited by 1
Çakır, D., Erkut, T. S., Irmak, Y., Çalış, M., Yavaş, E., Çaylı, S., & Gümüşderelı́oğlu, M. (2025) · Biomaterials Advances · doi:10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214532 · Cited by 1
Jia, T., Leotoing, L., Guines, D., & Gloriant, T. (2025) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107239 · Cited by 1
In silico clinical trial to predict the efficacy of alendronate for preventing hip fractures
Oliviero, S., Savelli, G., Viceconti, M., & Mattina, A. A. L. (2025) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106689 · Cited by 1
Hiranaka, T., Redgrift, A. G., Shadd, A., et al. (2025) · Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy · doi:10.1002/ksa.70150 · Cited by 1
Optimizing Full-arch Implant Rehabilitation with All-on-Four and All-on-Six Implants
Mayandi, V., Selvi, B. K., & Hariharan, A. (2025) · Oral Health Research and Clinical Evidence · doi:10.4103/orcl.orcl_22_25 · Cited by 1
Solvent-free melt-electrowriting of polycaprolactone-bioceramic composites
Eames, M. L., Weekes, A., Ayyachi, T., et al. (2025) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123943 · Cited by 1
Arca-Garcia, C., Godoy‐Gallardo, M., & Ginebra, M. (2025) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.12.026 · Cited by 1
“However, in all cases, the measured values remained above those typically reported for cortical bone [74,75] and for non-sintered calcium phosphate materials, [76 – 78], making them suitable for bone grafting applications.”
Vorobyev, A. M., Акимченко, И. О., Mukhamedshin, A., et al. (2026) · Surfaces · doi:10.3390/surfaces9010013 · Cited by 1
“Moreover, the Young’s modulus of human bone is generally in the range of several tens of GPa (for example, about 18 GPa for trabecular tissue and 20 GPa for cortical bone [49]).”
Skedros, J. G., Cronin, J. T., Mears, C. S., & Richards, B. W. (2026) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.70155 · Cited by 1
Wang, Z., Wang, X., Guo, H., et al. (2026) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-026-09770-5 · Cited by 1
“Notably, Model a exhibited a peak stress of 182.47 MPa, approaching the upper limit of the femoral ultimate load-bearing capacity in healthy adults (170–190 MPa) [26, 27], suggesting an elevated biomechanical risk associated with high-posi-tion screw placement.”
InfluentialHeterogeneous material mapping of micro-finite element models of human trabecular bone cores
Zojaji, M., Klei, M. V., & Ploeg, H. (2026) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1088/1873-4030/ae5c09 · Cited by 1
“Most have assumed a homogeneous tissue modulus (Bayraktar et al 2004, Verhulp et al 2008, Depalle et al 2013, Sandino and Boyd 2013, Koshyk et al 2024), with few considering heterogeneous material properties (Harrison et al 2008, Yang et al 2014, Knowles et al 2019, 2022, Fu et al 2021).”
Sadhasivam, R. S., & Duraiselvam, M. (2026) · Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance · doi:10.1007/s11665-026-13806-1 · Cited by 1
“The 50% and 60% RD auxetic lattices attained tensile strengths within the range of natural cortical bone (130-150 MPa), confirming their suitability for biomechanical applications (Ref 43).”
Yang, X., Yang, X., Guo, Z., et al. (2026) · Thin-Walled Structures · doi:10.1016/j.tws.2026.115118 · Cited by 1
McCandless, B. A., Raum, K., & Muller, M. M. (2026) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0043816 · Cited by 1
Managing large type 2a bone defects from osteoporotic tibial plateau fractures
Ren, Y., Scott, C. E. H., Xie, S., et al. (2026) · Bone and Joint Research · doi:10.1302/2046-3758.156.bjr-2025-0584.r1 · Cited by 1
“Addition ally, supraphysiological strain volume decreased by 47% in severely osteoporotic bone ( E 40 ), indicating that exten ded stems can effectively bypass compromised metaphyseal bone quality.”
Wang, Y., Xiao, Y., Yang, J., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine · doi:10.1177/09544119261461660 · Cited by 1
“17 Screw stability was evaluated from load–displacement stiffness by applying 0.1 mm displacements at the screw head in the superior, inferior, medial, and lateral directions, while axial load–displacement behavior was assessed under stepwise loading from 0 to 400 N, with yield displacement…”
InfluentialThe Mechanics of the Resurfaced Hip
Little, J. P., Simpson, D. J. W., & Gill, R. H. S. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4160-4724-7.50008-8 · Cited by 1
Impaction Loads Resulting in Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture: A Finite Element Study
Ioannidis, C. C., Dabirrahmani, D., Li, Q., Zhang, Z., Chen, J., & Appleyard, R. C. (2014) · Applied Mechanics and Materials · doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.553.299 · Cited by 1
“A maximum principal stress of 107 MPa was the criteria for fracture to occur in the femur [15].”
BackgroundSCREW-BONE INTERFACE MODELLING IN LOCKING PLATE FE MODELS
MacLeod, A. R., Pankaj, P., & Simpson, H. (2012) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(12)70334-2 · Cited by 1
Preclinical biomechanics of a new intramedullary nail for femoral diaphyseal fractures
Ivanov, D. V., Barabash, A., & Barabash, Y. (2015) · Russian Open Medical Journal · doi:10.15275/rusomj.2015.0205 · Cited by 1
Local Mechanical Properties of Highly Porous Si3N4 for Trabecular Bone Replacement
Vilčeková, Z., Kašiarová, M., Domanická, M., et al. (2015) · Key engineering materials · doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.662.142 · Cited by 1
“[5] compared the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue.”
BackgroundComputational Bone Mechanics: From the Cloud to an Orthopedists Mobile Device
Zohar Yosibash, A., Myers, K. W., & Levi, Y. (2015) · Lecture notes in computational science and engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22997-3_14 · Cited by 1
“This criterion estimates the yield initiation to occur at the location where the largest principal strain (by a linear elastic analysis) on the bone’s surface reaches a critical value of 7300 strains in tension or 10; 400 strains in compression (reported in [1]).”
BackgroundAnalysis on Biomechanical Characteristics of Shape Memory Alloy Fixation Grip for Femoral Fractures
Byun, T., Bae, T. S., & Kim, K.-H. (2016) · Advanced science and technology letters · doi:10.14257/astl.2016.141.05 · Cited by 1
Bioinspired Layered Composite Principles of Biomineralized Fish Scale
Nelms, M. D., Hodo, W., & Rajendran, A. M. (2017) · Springer transactions in civil and environmental engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-7170-6_21 · Cited by 1
Heuristic optimization of bone cement distribution for prevention of osteoporotic hip fractures
Artiles, M. E. S., & Venetsanos, D. T. (2016) · Cited by 1
Chabrand, P. R. (2018) · EMC - Aparato Locomotor · doi:10.1016/s1286-935x(18)92752-8 · Cited by 1
Finite Element Analysis in Lumbar Vertebrae after Pedicular Subtraction
(2018) · doi:10.29011/2575-9760.001175 · Cited by 1
“[30] conducted a study and found only 10% less rigidity of the trabecular bone, and others have confirmed [31,32].”
MethodResultSotto‐Maior, B. S., Silva, B. N., Figueiredo, P. Z., et al. (2019) · HU Revista · doi:10.34019/1982-8047.2019.v45.28675 · Cited by 1
Biomechanics and Stress Fractures: Utility of Running Gait Analysis
Meardon, S. A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46919-1_8 · Cited by 1
Human Response to High Rate Loading
Frazer, L. L., & Nicolella, D. P. (2020) · Cited by 1
Computational modelling of bone and bone remodelling
Gong, H., Wang, L., Zhang, M., & Fan, Y. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819531-4.00010-9 · Cited by 1
Patient Specific Modeling of Musculoskeletal Fractures
Peleg, E. (2011) · Studies in mechanobiology, tissue engineering and biomaterials · doi:10.1007/8415_2011_86 · Cited by 1
Tormena, F. V., Mercuri, E. G. F., & Hecke, M. B. (2013) · Applied Bionics and Biomechanics · doi:10.1155/2013/762867 · Cited by 1
牛, 文., 汤, 亭., 张, 明., et al. (2014) · Scientia Sinica Vitae · doi:10.1360/zc2014-44-11-1189 · Cited by 1
Development of a model to predict 3D femur morphology in infants and young children
McKinsey, K., Thompson, A. K., D’Souza, R., et al. (2022) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Imaging & Visualization · doi:10.1080/21681163.2022.2120828 · Cited by 1
“Thus, characterisation of the femur was limited by the exclusion of the cortical thickness and material properties (i.e. density which is often correlated with modulus and strength (Morgan et al. 2003; Bayraktar et al. 2004; Ohman et al. 2011)).”
BackgroundParvari, Y., Tehrani, S. V., & Kazemirad, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science · doi:10.1177/09544062221146927 · Cited by 1
Rauf, A., & Ahmad, S. I. (2023) · Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology · doi:10.22207/jpam.17.1.08 · Cited by 1
Finite element analysis of a stemmed hip prosthesis to reduce stress shielding in the proximal femur
Bliss, O., Swadener, J. G., Pierce, G., et al. (2023) · JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND SCIENCES · doi:10.15282/jmes.17.1.2023.5.0739 · Cited by 1
de Andrade, F. R., Quental, C., Folgado, J., et al. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app132111614 · Cited by 1
High-resolution local trabecular strain within trabecular structure under cyclic loading
Amraish, N., & Pahr, D. H. (2023) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106318 · Cited by 1
Combined musculoskeletal finite element modeling of femur stress during reactive balance training
Copeland, I., Pew, C., & Graham, D. F. (2024) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112062 · Cited by 1
Pahl, T., Radtke, A., Büttner, J. F., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0314034 · Cited by 1
Towards Bio-Mimetic 3D Printable Human Anatomies
Forni, R., Calderonel, D., Coato, D., et al. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Metrology for eXtended Reality, Artificial Intelligence and Neural Engineering (MetroXRAINE) · doi:10.1109/metroxraine62247.2024.10795909 · Cited by 1
Ding, H. D., Zhu, Z.-A., Dai, K., Ye, M., & Wang, C. (2008) · Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) · doi:10.1007/s12204-008-0623-5 · Cited by 1
The Effect of Load Direction on the Structure Capacity of Human Proximal Femur during Falling
Fu, L., Zhao, H. W., Zhu, Y. X., et al. (2011) · Applied Mechanics and Materials · doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.137.7 · Cited by 1
“In previous studies, Young's modulus of the cortical bone has been found to range from 11 to 24 GPa [8], and that of the cancellous bone has been found to range from 1.41 to 1.89 GPa [9].”
BackgroundInfluentialInsights to regenerate materials: learning from nature
García‐Aznar, J. M., Valero, C., Gómez‐Benito, M. J., et al. (2016) · Smart Materials and Structures · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/25/8/084001 · Cited by 1
Interaction study of muscle laceration and cortical bone fracture in a closed fracture
Salim, M. S., Shafi, I. M., Salleh, A. F., et al. (2018) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.5066736 · Cited by 1
A surrogate mechanostatistical microstructural model to inform whole hip cortical bone remodelling
Wang, X., Das, R. K., & Fernandez, J. (2019) · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cnm.3183 · Cited by 1
Ramos-Infante, S. J., & Pérez, M. Á. (2019) · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106647 · Cited by 1
“In each element of the FE mesh, e min and e max were assigned as follows: where ε limT = 0.0073 and ε limC = 0.0104 [36].”
BackgroundInfluentialAlexander, S., & Weerasooriya, T. (2020) · Cited by 1
Kahla, R. B., & Barkaoui, A. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-88467-9.00005-9 · Cited by 4
Cubillos, P. O., dos Santos, V. O., Fernandes, D. A., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine · doi:10.1177/09544119211049580 · Cited by 1
Mesh generation and mechanical tests of basic element cells of porous structures
Řehounek, L., & Jíra, A. (2022) · Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings · doi:10.14311/app.2022.34.0080 · Cited by 1
“in the range of 1–25 GPa [13], depending on the location in the human body and whether the tissue is trabecular or cortical (trabecular bone occupies the lower range of moduli while cortical bone is stiffer).”
BackgroundInfluentialGujar, R. A., Warhatkar, H. N., & Kale, A. (2023) · Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India) Series C · doi:10.1007/s40032-023-00944-x · Cited by 1
QCT-based computational bone strength assessment updated with MRI-derived ‘hidden’ microporosity
McPhee, S., Kershaw, L. E., Daniel, C. R., Fernández, M. P., Cillán‐García, E., Taylor, S. E., & Wolfram, U. (2023) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106094 · Cited by 1
[The effect of bone marrow ablation on regional biomechanical properties of rat tibia].
Эрсозлу, С., Sariözen, B., Özcan, R., et al. (2006) · PubMed · doi:10.3944/aott.v40i2.608 · Cited by 1
Viceconti, M., Taddei, F., & Schileo, E. (2008) · Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology · doi:10.1007/s10237-008-0141-2 · Cited by 1
“…tissue, shows very consistently in many different experiments, damage and even complete failure for strains in the range of 6,000–10,000 microstrain (Bayraktar et al. 2004; Currey 2004; Morgan et al. 2005a) almost independently from the degree of mineralization and the micromorphology of bone…”
BackgroundAnalyse des propriétés biomécaniques de l'os à l'échelle macroscopique
Beaupied, H., Lespessailles, É., & Benhamou, C.-L. (2007) · Revue du Rhumatisme · doi:10.1016/j.rhum.2007.02.001 · Cited by 5
Broviak, S. (2012) · Figshare · Cited by 1
Mechanics of the shoulder complex and clinical investigation in spinal cord injured individuals
Ruckstuhl, H. (2008) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-a-005693383 · Cited by 1
“of bone - with values of around 20 GPa for both trabecular and cortical bone [8, 164].”
BackgroundTrabecular Microarchitecture, Endplate Failure, and the Biomechanics of Human Vertebral Fractures
Fields, A. J. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
Silk Fibroin and Hydroxyapatite Composites for Bioresorbable Bone Fixation Devices
Heimbach, B. (2019) · OpenCommons at University of Connecticut (University of Connecticut) · Cited by 1
Time-sequence of biomechanical adaption in trabecular tissue during estrogen deficiency
O’Sullivan, L. (2020) · Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) · doi:10.13025/17271 · Cited by 1
Degradacijos paveikto stuburo juosmens slankstelio lūžių rizikos modeliavimas
Ardatov, O. (2021) · doi:10.20334/2021-006-m · Cited by 1
Subchondral bone properties of femoroacetabular impingement patients
Alnabelseya, A. (2012) · doi:10.22215/etd/2012-07252 · Cited by 1
Kuah, K. X., Salehi, M., Blackwood, D. J., Zhang, S. X., Seet, H. L., & Nai, M. L. S. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4591149 · Cited by 1
Biomechanics of Mineralized Collagens
Adnan, A., Sarker, F., & Ferdous, S. F. (2013) · doi:10.1002/9781118402955.ch23
Krzesiński, G. (2012) · Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej. Mechanika
Development of a Novel Revison Total Hip Arthroplasty Method for Femoral Component Extraction
Keenan, M. (2013) · UWM Digital Commons (University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee)
An experimental and computational investigation of bone cement residual stresses
Hingston, J. (2006) · Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology)
Injury Potential of Shock Induced Compressive Waves on Human Bone
Bailey, A. M., Boruah, S., Christopher, J. J., Bennett, B. C., Shafieian, M., Cronin, D. S., & Salzar, R. S. (2012) · Conference proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4238-7_19
Etchels, L. W. (2014) · UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University)
Sanada, J. T., Pereira, J. R., Assaoka, A. M. F., et al. (2011) · Journal of Oral Implantology · doi:10.1563/aaid-joi-d-10-00091
“A study analyzing the cortical bone and vertebrae of humans reported that strength values depended on the direction and type of load applied.(26) Analysis of the microtensile strength results observed for the mineralized group (12.”
BackgroundA finite element evaluation of the moment arm hypothesis for altered vertebral shear failure force
Howarth, S. J., Karakolis, T., & Callaghan, J. P. (2013) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1080/10255842.2013.820717
“It is noteworthy that a recent study reported that the effective tissue modulus for trabecular bone was 11% lower than the modulus of cortical bone (Bayraktar et al. 2004).”
BackgroundEmine, S. A. A. T., & Durmuş, A. S. (2009) · Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi · doi:10.9775/kvfd.2009.162
Mechanical Testing of Hydrated Collagen Nanofibrils Using MEMS Technology
Liu, Z., Smith, B. N., Kahn, H., et al. (2006) · IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE NANO) · doi:10.1109/nano.2006.247601
“Many studies have been performed on the mechanical properties of bone at the macroscale [1-2].”
BackgroundFeerick, E. M. (2012) · Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) · doi:10.13025/15925
Subject-Specific Computational Modeling of Spinal Constructs
Dai, Y. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.7274/ng451g07r3k
Degradation mechanics of bone and bone like materials via multiscale analysis
Sarker, F. (2014) · UTA ResearchCommons (University of Texas Arlington)
Owoc, J. S. (2013) · Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) · doi:10.11575/prism/26726
Srinivas, G. R., Deb, A., Chou, C. C., et al. (2016) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/2016-01-1529
Optimal Parameter Selection of an SVM Model: Application to Hip Fracture Risk Prediction
Jiang, P., & Missoum, S. (2013) · AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference (SDM) · doi:10.2514/6.2013-1935
Ribeiro, R., Rawal, B. R., & Bhatnagar, N. (2015) · IARJSET · doi:10.17148/iarjset.2015.2303
“4, it is seen that the stresses for the wedge cross section are well within the yield point for bone (yield strength of bone is 160 MPa [21]) as well as Ti alloy (yield strength of Ti6Al4V is 970 MPa), at all the chosen 0 0.”
BackgroundInfluentialA Probabilistic Assessment of Vertebral Cortical Bone Fracture of Intraosteonal Structures
Mabe, I. (2011) · CORE Scholar (Wright State University)
Osseointegrated system for fixation of upper leg protheses
Tomaszewski, P. K. (2012) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Fitzpatrick, C. K., Baldwin, M. A., Ali, A. A., et al. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4377-1503-3.00017-2
Biodegradable magnesium alloys for orthopaedic applications
(2021) · PubMed Central · doi:10.12336/biomatertransl.2021.03.005 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Bayraktar, H. H., Morgan, E. F., Niebur, G. L., Morris, G. E., Wong, E. K., & Keaveny, T. M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bayraktar, Harun H.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-35
- ISSN
- 0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089968363
- Cited by
- 1,142
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 13.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- University of California, San Francisco
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR-43784, R01AR043784, AR41481)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone fractures and treatments
- Keywords
- trabecular bone, cortical bone, femoral neck, elastic modulus, yield strain, tensile yield strength, compressive yield strength, finite element analysis
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cadaver, Computer Simulation, Elasticity, Femur Head, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Sensitivity and Specificity, Statistics as Topic, Stress, Mechanical, Tensile Strength, Reproducibility of Results, Weight-Bearing, Compressive Strength, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
