The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue
Abstract
The ability to determine trabecular bone tissue elastic and failure properties has biological and clinical importance. To date, trabecular tissue yield strains remain unknown due to experimental difficulties, and elastic moduli studies have reported controversial results. We hypothesized that the elastic and tensile and compressive yield properties of trabecular tissue are similar to those of cortical tissue. Effective tissue modulus and yield strains were calibrated for cadaveric human femoral neck specimens taken from 11 donors, using a combination of apparent-level mechanical testing and specimen-specific, high-resolution, nonlinear finite element modeling. The trabecular tissue properties were then compared to measured elastic modulus and tensile yield strain of human femoral diaphyseal cortical bone specimens obtained from a similar cohort of 34 donors. Cortical tissue properties were obtained by statistically eliminating the effects of vascular porosity. Results indicated that mean elastic modulus was 10% lower (p<0.05) for the trabecular tissue (18.0+/-2.8 GPa) than for the cortical tissue (19.9+/-1.8 GPa), and the 0.2% offset tensile yield strain was 15% lower for the trabecular tissue (0.62+/-0.04% vs. 0.73+/-0.05%, p<0.001). The tensile-compressive yield strength asymmetry for the trabecular tissue, 0.62 on average, was similar to values reported in the literature for cortical bone. We conclude that while the elastic modulus and yield strains for trabecular tissue are just slightly lower than those of cortical tissue, because of the cumulative effect of these differences, tissue strength is about 25% greater for cortical bone.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Results from this approach place the elastic modulus of human trabecular tissue at approximately 10% less, tensile yield strain at 15% less, and tensile/compressive tissue strength at 25% less than that of cortical bone (142).”
From Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States (2018) · cites this paper as [142]
Citations
Cites
The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue
Reilly, D. T., & Burstein, A. H. (1975) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(75)90075-5 · Cited by 1,533
Cowin, S. C. (2001) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b14263 · Cited by 1,456
Zysset, P. K., Guo, X.-D. E., Hoffler, C. E., Moore, K. E., & Goldstein, S. A. (1999) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00111-6 · Cited by 1,001
The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone
Gibson, L. J. (1985) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(85)90287-8 · Cited by 932
Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation
Rho, J.-Y., Tsui, T. Y., & Pharr, G. M. (1997) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00073-2 · Cited by 924
van Rietbergen, B., Weinans, H., Huiskes, R., & Odgaard, A. (1995) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(95)80008-5 · Cited by 865
Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site
Morgan, E. F., & Keaveny, T. M. (2001) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00011-2 · Cited by 705
Self-citationAging of bone tissue: mechanical properties.
Burstein, A. H., Reilly, D. T., & Martens, M. A. (1976) · PubMed · Cited by 614
Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties
Burstein, A., Reilly, D., & Martens, M. (1976) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-197658010-00015 · Cited by 569
Turner, C. H., Rho, J., Takano, Y., Tsui, T. Y., & Pharr, G. M. (1999) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00177-8 · Cited by 547
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,000
New method to determine the Young’s modulus of single trabeculae
Lorenzetti, S. (2006) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-a-005339099 · Cited by 4
Viscoelastic responses of the lumbar spine during prolonged stooping
Shin, G., Mirka, G. A., & Loboa, E. G. (2005) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e577432012-001 · Cited by 4
Ren, Y., Scott, C. E. H., Xie, S., et al. (2026) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research® · doi:10.1002/jor.70137 · Cited by 3
“The bone mechanical response was quantified by analysing principal strain distributions [33, 34], with yield thresholds of 0.5% for maximum principal strain (tension) and −0.7% for minimum principal strain (compression) in cancellous bone [35, 36].”
InfluentialRoger, R., Ghosh, R., Cai, Y., Gibson, F. G., Lazáry, Á., Guo, L., Lacroix, D. J., & Dall’Ara, E. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-46900-4 · Cited by 3
FE BONE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS WITH CT MAPPING OF INHOMOGENEOUS MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Bahia, M. T., Mercuri, E. G. F., & Hecke, M. B. (2016) · VII European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering · doi:10.7712/100016.2280.7408 · Cited by 3
“2 GPa for trabecular bone, as proposed by [25].”
Vertebral Trabecular Bone Mechanical Properties Vary Among Functional Groups of Cetaceans
Ingle, D. N., & Porter, M. E. (2022) · Integrative Organismal Biology · doi:10.1093/iob/obab036 · Cited by 3
“We calculated apparent stiffness ( E app : apparent Young’s Modulus), or the resistance to compression, as the slope of the steepest point of the linear portion of the σ–ε curve ( Bayraktar et al. 2004 ; Aiyanger et al. 2014 ).”
Hu, M., Li, M., Ma, R., et al. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26213 · Cited by 3
“As previous studies [30,31], the ultimate tensile strain ( ε lim-Tensile = 0.0073) was taken as 70% of the ultimate compressive strain ( ε lim-Compressive = 0.0104), and fundamentally, RF 1 is the safeguard to prevent fracture.”
BackgroundInfluentialNeto, F. C., Medeiros, V. K., Salinas, V., et al. (2024) · Metals · doi:10.3390/met14101145 · Cited by 3
Savelli, G., Oliviero, S., Mattina, A. A. L., & Viceconti, M. (2024) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-024-03636-4 · Cited by 3
“Nodal principal strains were averaged over a sphere with a radius of 3 mm (NumPy and SciPy libraries, Python) [62].”
Chen, H.-H., Wu, C.-W., Cheng, Y., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-94557-2 · Cited by 3
“Based on this, FE-strength was defined as the load causing a principal strain greater than the limit value (0.73 % tensile limit strain, 1.04 % compressive) in the femoral neck surface 39,42 43 .”
InfluentialIglesias, N. J., Nayak, V. V., Castellano, A., et al. (2025) · Biomimetics · doi:10.3390/biomimetics10060395 · Cited by 3
“Given the variable turnover rate, increased vascularity, reduced density, and increased porosity of trabecular bone compared to cortical bone, further investigation on the impact of the TP 3DS geometry in this pre-clinical setting is warranted prior to clinical application [27].”
Johnson, J. E., & Anderson, D. D. (2025) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112832 · Cited by 3
Suárez, D. R., Valstar, E. R., Rozing, P. M., & van Keulen, F. (2013) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine · doi:10.1177/0954411913491050 · Cited by 3
“04%).(25) However, the estimated principal strains in the RA bone for upper arm above 30 were mostly greater (up to 2.”
BackgroundMatsuki, H., SHIBANO, J.-I., KOBAYASHI, M., et al. (2015) · Journal of Medical Ultrasonics · doi:10.1007/s10396-014-0608-y · Cited by 3
Ando, K., & Fujiwara, S. (2016) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/joa.12518 · Cited by 3
“On the other hand, yield stress in cancellous bone, which is relatively low in density, is smaller than that in cortical bone, which is relatively high in density (e.g. Keaveny et al. 2003; Bayraktar et al. 2004).”
BackgroundGlobal and local characterization explains the different mechanisms of failure of the human ribs
Palanca, M., Liebsch, C., Hübner, S., et al. (2021) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104931 · Cited by 3
Tavakoli, A., Spangenberg, G. W., Reeves, J. M., Faber, K. J., & Langohr, G. D. G. (2023) · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jse.2023.04.006 · Cited by 3
Effect of Muscle Forces on Femur During Level Walking Using a Virtual Population of Older Women
Altai, Z., Montefiori, E., & Li, X. (2023) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-3449-3_15 · Cited by 3
Microstructural and dynamic mechanical behavior of the cortical bone
Uniyal, P., Kumar, N., & Spataro, M. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-19009-4.00020-5 · Cited by 3
Advanced Mechanics of Hard Tissue Using Imaging-Based Measurements and Artificial Intelligence
Tozzi, G., & Buehler, M. J. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-90646-3.00046-0 · Cited by 5
Kosmopoulos, V., Russell, R. D., Rodrigues, D. C., et al. (2020) · Engineering Reports · doi:10.1002/eng2.12218 · Cited by 3
Khakpour, S., Tanska, P., Saarakkala, S. S., et al. (2020) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110156 · Cited by 3
Plantar fascia loading at different running speed: a dynamic finite element model prediction
Chen, T. L., Wong, D. W., Wang, Y., et al. (2021) · HKIE Transactions · doi:10.33430/v28n1thie-2020-0011 · Cited by 3
de Bien, C., Mengoni, M., D'Otreppe, V., et al. (2012) · ORBi (University of Liège) · Cited by 3
Besdo, N. A. S. (2015) · Journal of Veterinary Science & Medical Diagnosis · doi:10.4172/2325-9590.1000150 · Cited by 3
“The material parameters for the bone [52] and the material properties of the callus at special stages of the healing process [53,54] were taken from the literature.”
MethodFuzzy Inference System Applied to Mechanical Design of Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds
Lara, H., Rodriguez, C. A., & Mendoza-Buenrostro, C. C. (2015) · doi:10.1109/apcase.2015.79 · Cited by 3
“For example, direct measurement in patients with image processing [3], or indirect way from laboratory experiments [4].”
BackgroundNoh, K., Kim, I.-H., Roh, H.-S., et al. (2012) · The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics · doi:10.4047/jkap.2012.50.1.1 · Cited by 3
Atypical viscous fracture of human femurs
Zohar Yosibash, A., Mayo, R. P., & Milgrom, C. (2014) · Advances in Biomechanics and Applications · doi:10.12989/aba.2014.1.2.077 · Cited by 3
“In the left femur, SG6 which is very close to the fracture path reached almost 10,000 µstrains just before fracture, well beyond the anticipated “yield strain” of 7300 µstrain Bayraktar et al. (2004).”
BackgroundFEM Analysis of a DCP Implant on a Human Femoral Bone With a Fracture Gap
Fongsamootr, T., & Bernard, S. (2011) · Journal of ASTM International · doi:10.1520/jai103924 · Cited by 3
Indentation experiments and simulation of ovine bone using a viscoelastic-plastic damage model
Zhao, Y., Wu, Z., Turner, S., et al. (2011) · Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sources · doi:10.1557/jmr.2011.357 · Cited by 3
Self-citationA Method for Modeling Time-Dependant Mechanical Properties of Tissue Scaffolds
Bawolin, N. K., Chen, D., & Zhang, W. (2007) · International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icma.2007.4303758 · Cited by 3
“In the finite element approach, the scaffold is discretized with finite elements, which are subjected to certain boundary conditions simulating the tension/compression loading on the scaffold; and the node deflections, in response to the loading, are then used in conjunction with the stress distribution to evaluate th…”
MethodBettamer, A., & Hambli, R. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803581-8.04017-0 · Cited by 3
Wen, X., Xu, C., Zong, C., et al. (2016) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.03.004 · Cited by 3
Mechanical Behavior of Trabecular Bone
Mostakhdemin, M. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804634-0.00003-3 · Cited by 3
Graded Cellular Bone Scaffolds
Limmahakhun, S., & Yan, C. (2017) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.69911 · Cited by 3
“1 GPa, which is in the same level of bone stiffness [44, 53].”
BackgroundAnzolin, D., de Carvalho, G. A. P., Franco, A. B. G., et al. (2019) · InterAmerican Journal of Medicine and Health · doi:10.31005/10.31005/iajmh · Cited by 3
“For this reason, the possibility of fracture should be carefully evaluated, keeping in mind that the larger the result, the higher the risk of bone resorption [12].”
Ferguson, V. L., & Olesiak, S. E. (2010) · Pan Stanford Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1201/b12116-8 · Cited by 3
MICROSTRUCTURAL STRESSES AND STRAINS ASSOCIATED WITH TRABECULAR BONE MICRODAMAGE
Nagaraja, S. (2006) · UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University) · Cited by 3
Yang, S. (2006) · doi:10.18297/etd/1612 · Cited by 3
“The small strain, linear-elastic response of trabecular bone results from the elastic bending and compression of the trabeculae (Bayraktar et al., 2004a; Rietbergen et al., 1995).”
BackgroundMethodCommentary: Evaluating the Role of Seagrass in Cenozoic CO2 Variations
Macreadie, P. I., Serrano, Ó., Duarte, C. M., Beardall, J., & Maher, D. T. (2017) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2017.00055 · Cited by 3
Development of Functionally Graded Materials for Innovation in Bone-Replacement Applications
Limmahakhun, S. (2017) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.108053 · Cited by 3
Mendoza, M. A. (2013) · doi:10.15368/theses.2013.156 · Cited by 3
“cortical bone is indeed mechanically superior to cancellous with roughly 25 percent greater strength [61].”
BackgroundFinite element modelling of screw fixation in augmented and non-augmented cancellous bone
Kamane, P. B. (2012) · Cited by 3
Evaluating femoral head collapse risk post-fixation removal: a finite element analysis
Li, X., Zhou, X., Yang, J., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2025.1441026 · Cited by 2
Pasini, M., Cavazzoni, G., Dall’Ara, E., et al. (2025) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107109 · Cited by 2
Johnson, J. E., Anderson, D. D., Bozoghlian, M. F., et al. (2025) · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jse.2025.08.023 · Cited by 2
Krishnan, R. M., Ranganathan, R., & Saiyathibrahim, A. (2025) · Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance · doi:10.1007/s11665-025-12878-9 · Cited by 2
“The target was to achieve a combination of mechanical properties that fall within the range of human cortical bone (compressive yield strength: (cid:2) 130-200 MPa, elastic modulus: (cid:2) 10-30 GPa (Ref 59, 60)) to mitigate stress shielding while maintaining sufficient porosity for bone ingrowth.”
Fraterrigo, G., Santamaria, A. D., Iori, G., Pani, M., Crimi, G., Schileo, E., & Taddei, F. (2025) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107326 · Cited by 2
DXA-derived three-dimensional finite element models of the femur: validation against CT-based models
Aldieri, A., Bhattacharya, P., Paggiosi, M., Eastell, R., & Grassi, L. (2026) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2026.117830 · Cited by 2
Navicular and fifth metatarsal base stress fractures: An illustrated anatomical review
Liu, X., Hong, C. C., Reina, F., Carrera, A., Alcolea‐Madera, E., Vecchio, J. J. D., & Dalmau‐Pastor, M. (2026) · Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy · doi:10.1002/ksa.70413 · Cited by 2
“Given that the tensile strength of cancellous bone is around 70% of its compressive strength [4, 35], making it more susceptible to tensile rather than compressive failure.”
Ghosh, R., Shearman, E., Roger, R., Palanca, M., Dall’Ara, E., & Lacroix, D. J. (2026) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2026.117961 · Cited by 2
Ciaccia, M., Muller-Karger, C. M., Casanova, E., & Antonio, T. S. (2016) · IEEE Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM) · doi:10.1109/etcm.2016.7750871 · Cited by 2
“In this work, the probabilistic approach from [2], [7] for the elasticity modulus and the compressive failure stress, referred hereafter as the Keller-Laz equations, and for the failure strain from [21], were selected.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLü, Y., Cui, Z.-T., Zhu, H., et al. (2018) · Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering · doi:10.1007/s40846-018-0433-7 · Cited by 2
Fölsch, C., Dharma, J., Ulloa, C. A. F., et al. (2020) · Cell and Tissue Banking · doi:10.1007/s10561-020-09832-5 · Cited by 2
Investigation of femur fracture potential in common pediatric falls using finite element analysis
McKinsey, K., Thompson, A. K., & Bertocci, G. E. (2020) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1080/10255842.2020.1837119 · Cited by 2
“%) should be greater than that of the applied adult values (0.73%; Bayraktar et al. 2004).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialFeng, C., Wang, L., Xu, P., et al. (2020) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110208 · Cited by 2
Almendros-Abellán, V. M., Castro‐García, M., Canales‐Vázquez, J., et al. (2021) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2021.115865 · Cited by 2
Experimental orthopedic biomechanics
Barbera, L. L., Villa, T. M. T., Innocenti, B., & Galbusera, F. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-824481-4.00006-8 · Cited by 2
Boyd, S. K., & Müller, R. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814841-9.00079-8 · Cited by 3
An approach for simultaneous reduction and fixation of mandibular fractures
Snyder, E., Trabia, M. B., & Trabelsi, N. (2022) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1080/10255842.2022.2105143 · Cited by 2
“Similarly, Von Mises strain did not surpass yield (Bayraktar et al. 2004).”
BackgroundPan-cancer analysis of the oncogenic role of the core osteosarcoma gene VCAN in human tumors.
Zhou, H., Lu, D., Yu, D., Luo, C., Xie, K., Ma, H., Li, S., Liang, J., Wei, F., Chen, L., et al. (2023) · PubMed Central · Cited by 2
Abdulaziz, D. A., Anastasiou, A. D., Panagiotopoulou, V. C., Raïf, E. M., Giannoudis, P. V., & Jha, A. (2023) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106223 · Cited by 2
Oda, T., Maeyama, A., Ishimatsu, T., et al. (2024) · Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/23259671241233014 · Cited by 2
“It has also been reported that bone density affects elasticity and stiffness, which correlate with the occurrence of hinge fractures 3,7,10 ; thus, further multi-faceted evaluation is needed to determine the specific safe zone for the hinge point for LCWDFO.”
BackgroundKajiwara, Y., Honda, Y., Takahashi, A., et al. (2024) · PubMed · Cited by 2
Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Bone Quality in Metabolic Bone Diseases
Sollmann, N., Dieckmeyer, M., Carballido‐Gamio, J., et al. (2024) · Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology · doi:10.1055/s-0044-1788693 · Cited by 2
“94,95 Although imaging of bony trabeculae and cortex is the mainstay of X-ray – based techniques, it can also be achieved with MRI.”
Meisterhans, M., Calek, A., Zindel, C., et al. (2024) · The Knee · doi:10.1016/j.knee.2024.10.002 · Cited by 2
Symmetric normalization algorithm for estimating physiological strain in bones
Henyš, P., Dall’Ara, E., & Martelli, S. (2024) · European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids · doi:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105539 · Cited by 2
Lacroix, C., Spangenberg, G. W., Faber, K. J., & Langohr, G. D. G. (2024) · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.002 · Cited by 2
Samuelson, E. M., Lyden, E. R., Haider, H., et al. (2025) · Shoulder & Elbow · doi:10.1177/17585732251324497 · Cited by 2
“20 The osteoporotic bone model was comprised of solid rigid poly-urethane foam of (0.16 g/cm 3 ), as opposed to the standard (0.27 g/cm 3 ) solid rigid polyurethane foam of the fourth generation synthetic bone.”
InfluentialLimzider, N., Rittel, D., & Shemtov‐Yona, K. (2025) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107214 · Cited by 3
Mechanical Behavior of Cortical Bone
Ng, T. P., & Koloor, S. S. R. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804634-0.00002-1 · Cited by 2
Kok, J., Odin, K., Rokkones, S., Grassi, L., & Isaksson, H. (2022) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105364 · Cited by 2
Effect of Window Geometry on Strength of Shaft Part of Femur Bone
Hedayati, R., & Zare, S. M. F. A. (2015) · Periodica Polytechnica Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.3311/ppme.7861 · Cited by 2
Modèle de remodelage osseux au sein du tissu trabéculaire sous-contraint
Magnier, C., Wendling, S., & Chabrand, P. R. (2007) · Comptes Rendus Mécanique · doi:10.1016/j.crme.2006.11.006 · Cited by 2
Custom Design Of Knee Joint Prosthesis By Using Computerized Tomography (Ct) Images And 3D Modelling
Alyazji, Q. (2014) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1309224 · Cited by 2
Chiba, D., Mori, Y., Sano, H., et al. (2016) · Journal of Orthopaedic Science · doi:10.1016/j.jos.2016.04.003 · Cited by 2
A new finite element with variable Young's modulus
Mazur, K., Krawczuk, M., & Dąbrowski, L. (2023) · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cnm.3712 · Cited by 2
“Another approach to building a FEM model for such material as bone is to assign one finite element to one pixel/ vortex of a CT or (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) MRI picture.(6,7) To create as a precise model as it is possible, the scan picture is divided into sections accordingly to their brightness.”
BackgroundMethodFang, Z., Ranslow, A. N., Tomas-Medina, P. D., Gunnarsson, A., Weerasooriya, T., Satapathy, S., Thompson, K. A., & Kraft, R. H. (2018) · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4039895 · Cited by 2
Prediction of failure in cancellous bone using extended finite element method
Salem, M., Westover, L., Adeeb, S., & Duke, K. (2020) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine · doi:10.1177/0954411920936057 · Cited by 2
“5 cm(3)) is smaller than the size of specimens in the reported experiments, which often range between 5 and 10mm.(38,68,69) Also, the results were obtained from one specimen and should be extended to several larger specimens from various anatomical locations.”
BackgroundA taper-fit junction to improve long bone reconstruction: A parametric In Silico model
Schileo, E., Feltri, P., Taddei, F., et al. (2021) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104790 · Cited by 2
Prediction of the Elastic Modulus of the Trabecular Bone Based on X-Ray Computed Tomography
Madi, K., Aufort, G., Gasser, A., et al. (2010) · World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14515-5_203 · Cited by 2
“In this work, the tissue element properties were chosen linear elastic and isotropic with a Young’s modulus of 17 Gpa and Poisson’s ratio of 0.3 [ 12 ].”
MethodInfluentialThe mechanical behavior of bone
Karim, L., Hussein, A. I., Vaidya, R., Morgan, E. F., & Bouxsein, M. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813073-5.00013-7 · Cited by 2
Self-citationGrace, T. M., Solomon, L. B., Atkins, G. J., et al. (2022) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105311 · Cited by 2
Targosinski, J., Kusins, J. R., Martensson, N., et al. (2022) · Lecture notes in computational vision and biomechanics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-10015-4_16 · Cited by 2
Bucciarelli, A., Pedranz, A., Gambari, L., Petretta, M., Vivarelli, L., Dallari, D., Grigolo, B., Maniglio, D., & Grassi, F. (2023) · Advanced Materials Technologies · doi:10.1002/admt.202300635 · Cited by 2
Quan, V. M., Ngoc, T. –. N. D., Nguyen, T.-H., et al. (2024) · Materials Letters · doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2024.136555 · Cited by 2
Biomineralization: Apatite Protein Interaction
Tsuji, T., Iijima, M., & Onuma, K. (2012) · Biological and medical physics series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5372-7_4 · Cited by 2
Wittkowske, C., Raith, S., Eder, M., et al. (2016) · Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1515/bmt-2015-0176 · Cited by 2
Medicine and the Virtual Physiological Human
Martelli, S., Al‐Dirini, R. M. A., & Jan, S. V. S. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-816713-7.00043-x · Cited by 2
Overlapping Versus “Kissing” Plates in Femur: A FEM Study
Santoro, D., Nardi, M., Lasorella, F., & Bignardi, C. (2019) · The Open Biomedical Engineering Journal · doi:10.2174/1874120701913010094 · Cited by 2
“Other authors report that cortical bone tensile yield stress is between about 80 MPa and 150 MPa including osteoporotic bone [33].”
BackgroundVeerasakul, M. S., Wanchat, S., & Chantarapanich, N. (2021) · Engineering Journal · doi:10.4186/ej.2021.25.2.183 · Cited by 2
The mechanics of microdamage and microfracture in trabecular bone
Toal, V. R. (2013) · Cited by 2
Hautamäki, M. (2012) · UTUPub (University of Turku) · Cited by 2
The Virtual Hip: An Anatomically Accurate Finite Element Model Based on the Visible Human Dataset
Ford, J. M. (2010) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 2
Rennick, J. A. (2012) · doi:10.17760/d20002649 · Cited by 2
Intraoperative biomechanics of lumbar pedicle screw loosening following successful arthrodesisPreprint
Pearson, H. B., Dobbs, C. J., Grantham, E., Niebur, G. L., Chappuis, J. L., & Boerckel, J. D. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/057935 · Cited by 2
Self-citationMechanical and morphometric characterization of cancellous bone
González, R. B. (2020) · doi:10.4995/thesis/10251/149376 · Cited by 2
Cox, J. M., Smith, J. D., van der Meulen, M. C. H., & Cole, J. H. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.11.30.470675 · Cited by 2
“Aside from the limitations inherent in a linear, single step finite element analysis, our models assumed an isotropic stiffness for all elements despite in vivo bone tissue exhibiting material anisotropy, with greater yield strain and stiffness in compression than in tension [65].”
Humerus fractures in an infant: which causal mechanisms?
Delbreil, A., Bouriat, M., Pin, A., et al. (2019) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1080/10255842.2020.1715000 · Cited by 1
Effect of variations in tissue-level ductility on human vertebral strength
Sadoughi, S., Scheidt, A. V., Nawathe, S., Zhu, S., Moini, A., & Keaveny, T. M. (2020) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2020.115445 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bayraktar, H. H., Morgan, E. F., Niebur, G. L., Morris, G. E., Wong, E. K., & Keaveny, T. M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bayraktar, Harun H.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-35
- ISSN
- 0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089968363
- Cited by
- 1,142
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 13.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- University of California, San Francisco
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR-43784, R01AR043784, AR41481)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone fractures and treatments
- Keywords
- trabecular bone, cortical bone, femoral neck, elastic modulus, yield strain, tensile yield strength, compressive yield strength, finite element analysis
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cadaver, Computer Simulation, Elasticity, Femur Head, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Sensitivity and Specificity, Statistics as Topic, Stress, Mechanical, Tensile Strength, Reproducibility of Results, Weight-Bearing, Compressive Strength, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review