The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue
Abstract
The ability to determine trabecular bone tissue elastic and failure properties has biological and clinical importance. To date, trabecular tissue yield strains remain unknown due to experimental difficulties, and elastic moduli studies have reported controversial results. We hypothesized that the elastic and tensile and compressive yield properties of trabecular tissue are similar to those of cortical tissue. Effective tissue modulus and yield strains were calibrated for cadaveric human femoral neck specimens taken from 11 donors, using a combination of apparent-level mechanical testing and specimen-specific, high-resolution, nonlinear finite element modeling. The trabecular tissue properties were then compared to measured elastic modulus and tensile yield strain of human femoral diaphyseal cortical bone specimens obtained from a similar cohort of 34 donors. Cortical tissue properties were obtained by statistically eliminating the effects of vascular porosity. Results indicated that mean elastic modulus was 10% lower (p<0.05) for the trabecular tissue (18.0+/-2.8 GPa) than for the cortical tissue (19.9+/-1.8 GPa), and the 0.2% offset tensile yield strain was 15% lower for the trabecular tissue (0.62+/-0.04% vs. 0.73+/-0.05%, p<0.001). The tensile-compressive yield strength asymmetry for the trabecular tissue, 0.62 on average, was similar to values reported in the literature for cortical bone. We conclude that while the elastic modulus and yield strains for trabecular tissue are just slightly lower than those of cortical tissue, because of the cumulative effect of these differences, tissue strength is about 25% greater for cortical bone.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Results from this approach place the elastic modulus of human trabecular tissue at approximately 10% less, tensile yield strain at 15% less, and tensile/compressive tissue strength at 25% less than that of cortical bone (142).”
From Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States (2018) · cites this paper as [142]
Citations
Cites
The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue
Reilly, D. T., & Burstein, A. H. (1975) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(75)90075-5 · Cited by 1,533
Cowin, S. C. (2001) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b14263 · Cited by 1,456
Zysset, P. K., Guo, X.-D. E., Hoffler, C. E., Moore, K. E., & Goldstein, S. A. (1999) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00111-6 · Cited by 1,001
The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone
Gibson, L. J. (1985) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(85)90287-8 · Cited by 932
Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation
Rho, J.-Y., Tsui, T. Y., & Pharr, G. M. (1997) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00073-2 · Cited by 924
van Rietbergen, B., Weinans, H., Huiskes, R., & Odgaard, A. (1995) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(95)80008-5 · Cited by 865
Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site
Morgan, E. F., & Keaveny, T. M. (2001) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00011-2 · Cited by 705
Self-citationAging of bone tissue: mechanical properties.
Burstein, A. H., Reilly, D. T., & Martens, M. A. (1976) · PubMed · Cited by 614
Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties
Burstein, A., Reilly, D., & Martens, M. (1976) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-197658010-00015 · Cited by 569
Turner, C. H., Rho, J., Takano, Y., Tsui, T. Y., & Pharr, G. M. (1999) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00177-8 · Cited by 547
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,000
Ren, Y., Scott, C. E. H., Xie, S., et al. (2025) · Bone and Joint Research · doi:10.1302/2046-3758.1410.bjr-2024-0579.r1 · Cited by 6
Galteri, G., Palanca, M., Alesi, D., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1360208 · Cited by 6
“These uncertainties should be compared against the strain magnitudes experienced by bone in physiological loading conditions (2000 microstrain (Lanyon, 1980)) and against the failure strains of bone (7,000 – 10000 microstrain (Bayraktar et al., 2004).”
Cyclic cryopreservation affects the nanoscale material properties of trabecular bone
Landauer, A. K., Mondal, S., Yuya, P. A., et al. (2014) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.08.027 · Cited by 6
“, 2012; Oyen, 2010), differences between cortical and cancellous structures (Bayraktar et al., 2004), and osteonal and lamellar differences (Faingold et al.”
BackgroundMortazavi, S. M. J., Farahmand, F., Behzadipour, S., et al. (2019) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.09.012 · Cited by 6
Altai, Z., Viceconti, M., Li, X., et al. (2019) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2019.08.026 · Cited by 6
Dereshgi, H. A., Serbest, K., BALIK, B., et al. (2022) · Journal of Polytechnic · doi:10.2339/politeknik.1025328 · Cited by 6
“(2004) investigated the properties of femoral cortical and trabecular bone structure using mechanical tests and nonlinear finite element method [20].”
MethodOmer, M., Ngo, C., Ali, H., Orlovskaya, N. A., Cheong, V. S., Ballesteros, A., Garner, M. T., Wynn, A., Martyniak, K., Wei, F., et al. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15051209 · Cited by 6
Johnson, J. E., Clarke, G. A., Netto, C. D. C., et al. (2024) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research® · doi:10.1002/jor.25796 · Cited by 6
“22 FEA was performed for three different clinical fixation scenarios (Figure 3): Interference was modeled at the sidewalls and pegs of the implants according to the manufacturer's guidelines.”
MethodInfluentialSullivan, N., Kleffner, M., & Brett, C. E. (2013) · Palaeontologia Electronica · doi:10.26879/388 · Cited by 6
van den Munckhof, S., Nikooyan, A. A., & ZADPOOR, A. A. (2014) · Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1142/s0219519415300033 · Cited by 6
Fu, L., Zhao, H., Zhu, Y.-X., et al. (2012) · doi:10.1109/isra.2012.6219136 · Cited by 6
Sano, H., Imagawa, K., Yamamoto, N., et al. (2015) · Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering · doi:10.3233/bme-151535 · Cited by 6
“For each triangular shell element, the Young’s modulus was set so as to be equivalent to that of the adjacent tetrahedral solid element, while the minimum Young’s modulus of the shell element was set to 10 GPa based on previous reports [12,13].”
PRAMUDITA, J. A., Kamiya, S., UJIHASHI, S., et al. (2016) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1080/10255842.2016.1196197 · Cited by 6
“Material properties of each part were mainly taken from literature (Fung 1981; Maeno et al. 1998; Wirtz et al. 2000; Bayraktar et al. 2004; Helgason et al. 2008; Choi & Lee 2010) as described in Table 2.”
MethodStress Analysis of Improper Femur Cut in Total Knee Arthroplasty by Finite Element Method
Su, W. L., You, K. D., Yang, C., et al. (2019) · Journal of Mechanics · doi:10.1017/jmech.2019.45 · Cited by 6
Sheremetyev, V., Dubinskiy, S., Iqbal, M. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4048514 · Cited by 6
Alexander, S. L., & Weerasooriya, T. (2021) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104302 · Cited by 6
Baharuddin, M. Y., Salleh, S., Hamedi, M., et al. (2014) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2014/478248 · Cited by 6
“The stress was normally distributed at metaphyseal region which was essential for primary stability fixation, preventing stress shielding at the proximal calcar as shown in We extracted active features using vector support machine classifier as shown in Figure 5.”
BackgroundInfluentialXie, P., Deng, Y., Tan, J., et al. (2020) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-020-02137-5 · Cited by 6
Rotman, D., Ariel, G., Lievano, J. L. R., Schermann, H., Trabelsi, N., Salai, M., Yosibash, Z., & Sternheim, A. (2021) · The Bone & Joint Journal · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.103b9.bjj-2020-2147.r1 · Cited by 6
Shore, S. W., Unnikrishnan, G. U., Hussein, A. I., & Morgan, E. F. (2012) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b13733-3 · Cited by 6
Self-citationFunctional Micro-imaging at the Interface of Bone Mechanics and Biology
Müller, R., Nazarian, A., Schneider, P., Stauber, M., Thurner, P. J., van Lenthe, H., & Voide, R. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-31184-x_34 · Cited by 6
Computer Simulation of Fracture Fixation Using Extramedullary Devices: An Appraisal
MacLeod, A. R., & Pankaj, P. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0745-8_7 · Cited by 6
Changes in mineralization and biomechanics of tibial metaphyses in splinted rats
Lentle, R. G., & Kruger, M. C. (2005) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00845.2004 · Cited by 6
“In this study, the effect of mechanical unloading on a defined site of predominantly cortical bone (14), i.e., the central area of the metaphyses, was evaluated in view of the known differences in the elastic properties of cancellous and cortical bone ( 1 , 4), the adaptation of cortical bone on the anterior surfaces…”
BackgroundExperimental and numerical analysis of Izod impact test of cortical bone tissue
Abdelwahab, A. A., & Silberschmidt, V. V. (2012) · The European Physical Journal Special Topics · doi:10.1140/epjst/e2012-01585-3 · Cited by 6
Femoral subchondral bone properties of patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement
Haider, I. T., Speirs, A., Alnabelseya, A., et al. (2016) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2016.01.003 · Cited by 6
Kashani, M. R. A., Nikkhoo, M., Khalaf, K. A., Firoozbakhsh, K. K., Arjmand, N., Razmjoo, A., & Parnianpour, M. (2014) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine · doi:10.1177/0954411914563363 · Cited by 6
“3 is generally used for the tissue.(33,43,53,54) Since this value has not been verified experimentally, several”
Mechanical Behaviour of Cancellous bone: Compression and Three-Point Bending Test
Ghazali, F. A. M., & Syahrom, A. (2022) · Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences · doi:10.11113/mjfas.v18n3.2274 · Cited by 5
“Microscopically, cancellous bone architecture is organized to optimise load transmission whereby mechanical properties of cancellous bone tissue depends on architecture (Ruiz, Schouwenaars, Ramírez, Jacobo, & Ortiz, 2010), cancellous bone properties, and volume fraction (Bayraktar et al., 2004; Osterhoff et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPatterson, B. M., Johnson, J. E., Bozoghlian, M. F., et al. (2024) · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty · doi:10.1177/24715492241291311 · Cited by 5
“For example, based on the empirically known yield strain of bone (0.62% in tension), 41 the scapular regions experiencing high stresses (>70 MPa; Figure 6) would exceed the yield strength limit (56 MPa, for the assumed scapula-speci fi c cortical material), potentially placing them at a higher risk…”
BackgroundInfluentialBrand, K., Dakhili, G., Lampe, F., et al. (2025) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106671 · Cited by 5
Kwak, D.-K., Lee, Y., Lee, S. J., Lee, S., & Yoo, J. (2025) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-025-08681-1 · Cited by 6
“The yield strength of the screw-bone construct was obtained from previous studies (TI6A14V, 880 MPa; cortical bone, 118 MPa; and cancellous bone, 22 MPa) [42].”
Cristofolini, L., Brandolini, N., Danesi, V., Erani, P., Viceconti, M., & Ferguson, S. J. (2016) · Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1142/s0219519416500743 · Cited by 5
Idealized conductance: A new method to evaluate stiffness of trabecular bone
Feng, C., Yao, J., Wang, L., et al. (2020) · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cnm.3425 · Cited by 5
Purcell, P., Tyndyk, M., McEvoy, F., et al. (2021) · The International Journal of Spine Surgery · doi:10.14444/8040 · Cited by 5
Shamsi, M., & Sedighi, M. (2022) · Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance · doi:10.1007/s11665-022-07365-4 · Cited by 5
Atthapreyangkul, A., Hoffman, M., Pearce, G., & Standard, O. (2022) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105578 · Cited by 5
Low Young’s Modulus TiNbSn Alloy Locking Plates Accelerate Osteosynthesis in Rabbit Tibiae
Koguchi, M., Mori, Y., Kamimura, M., et al. (2023) · The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1620/tjem.2023.j075 · Cited by 5
“M M The free resonance vibration method measured Young's moduli of the plates (Hanada et al. 2014); TiNbSn alloy and CP-Ti plates had values of 49.1 GPa and 107 GPa, respectively. n u n u The TiNbSn alloy plates were produced from bars through an extrusion and swaging processes and fabricated using the same design as…”
InfluentialChakraborty, A., Sahare, K. D., Majumder, S., et al. (2023) · International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering · doi:10.1615/intjmultcompeng.2023049024 · Cited by 5
Li, M., Zeng, Y., Nie, Y., Liao, K., Pei, F., Yang, J., Xie, H., & Shen, B. (2023) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1097/js9.0000000000000810 · Cited by 5
“[50] was 0.0062 and 0.0073, respectively.”
InfluentialSoar, P., Palanca, M., Dall’Ara, E., & Tozzi, G. (2024) · Extreme Mechanics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.eml.2024.102202 · Cited by 5
Oldhoff, M. G. E., Kamal, Z., ten Duis, K., et al. (2024) · Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research · doi:10.1186/s13018-024-04957-9 · Cited by 5
“The yield stress of bone, patient-specific implant, conventional implant and screws are 108 MPa [44], 875 MPa [45], 250 MPa and 250 MPa [46], respectively.”
BackgroundComputational Modeling of Trabecular Bone Mechanics
Niebur, G. L., & Keaveny, T. M. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3575-2_9 · Cited by 5
“Using tissue yield properties similar to that of cortical bone from the same anatomic site can result in good prediction of the yield behavior of trabecular bone at the macroscopic level [ 5 ].”
BackgroundSelf-citationStress development at human femur by muscle forces
Kenedi, P. P., & Riagusoff, I. I. T. (2014) · Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s40430-014-0164-9 · Cited by 5
Fågelberg, E., Grassi, L., Aspenberg, P., & Isaksson, H. (2015) · International Biomechanics · doi:10.1080/23335432.2015.1014848 · Cited by 5
“Both the predicted stress and strain states in the bone and close to the crack tip were within the linear elastic region of bone (Bayraktar et al. 2004; Ohman et al. 2008).”
BackgroundTAWARA, D., Noro, K., Tsujikami, T., OKAMOTO, Y., & Murakami, H. (2014) · Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering · doi:10.1299/jbse.13-00163 · Cited by 5
A numerical model of the tension band wiring technique for olecranon fracture reduction
Greenfield, J., Lestriez, P., Arand, C., et al. (2016) · Applied Mathematics and Computation · doi:10.1016/j.amc.2016.10.016 · Cited by 5
Understanding Hip Fracture by QCT-Based Finite Element Modeling
Bisheh, H., & Luo, Y. (2017) · Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering · doi:10.1007/s40846-017-0266-9 · Cited by 5
Rittel, D., Shemtov‐Yona, K., & Korabi, R. (2017) · Current Oral Health Reports · doi:10.1007/s40496-017-0148-9 · Cited by 5
In vitro and in silico characterization of open-cell structures of trabecular bone
Ramos-Infante, S. J., & Pérez, M. Á. (2017) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1080/10255842.2017.1390086 · Cited by 5
Dynamic Simulation of Biomechanical Behaviour of the Pelvis in the Lateral Impact Loads
Hatami, M., Wang, D., Qu, A., Zeng, X., Wang, Q., & Kazemian, B. B. (2018) · Journal of Healthcare Engineering · doi:10.1155/2018/3083278 · Cited by 5
Reeves, J. M., Athwal, G. S., Johnson, J. A., & Langohr, G. D. G. (2018) · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4042172 · Cited by 5
van Gestel, N. A. P., Gabriels, F., Geurts, J. A. P., et al. (2019) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma12213481 · Cited by 5
Minguella-Canela, J., Calero, J. A., Korkusuz, F., et al. (2020) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma13112497 · Cited by 5
“In general, and classifying the bones depending on their mechanical behaviour [24,25], the trabecular bone, in the form of long bones with mineral compounds, has lower elastic modulus, density and yield strength than cortical bones, as well as a more dense structure that forms the outer surface of the bone [26].”
BackgroundDai, X., Fan, R., Wu, H., et al. (2022) · Applied Bionics and Biomechanics · doi:10.1155/2022/3406984 · Cited by 5
“The discrepancy in the exponent in the damage variable expression is a major difference between the cortical bone and trabecular bone in fracture simulation based on CDM theory [31, 32].”
MethodSkedros, J. G., Cronin, J. T., Dayton, M. R., Bloebaum, R. D., & Bachus, K. N. (2023) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2023.111495 · Cited by 5
The Biomechanics of the Transpedicular Endoscopic Approach
Meisterhans, M., Hagel, V., Spirig, J. M., et al. (2023) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000004871 · Cited by 5
“35 Foraminoplasty reduces the superior cortex of the pedicle, which is in tension under axial compression.”
BackgroundWoźna, A., Junka, A., & Hoppe, V. (2021) · Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics · doi:10.37190/abb-01788-2021-04 · Cited by 5
Woiczinski, M., Tollrian, C., Schröder, C., Steinbrück, A., Müller, P. E., & Jansson, V. (2013) · Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1515/bmt-2013-0003 · Cited by 5
“[4] used an iterative matching procedure with the experimental compression modulus of the bone biopsies as the match criterion.”
Boccia, E., Gizzi, A., Cherubini, C., et al. (2017) · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cnm.2900 · Cited by 5
Numerical investigation of the effect of bone cement porosity on osteoporotic femoral augmentation
Artiles, M. E. S., & Venetsanos, D. T. (2018) · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cnm.2989 · Cited by 5
“If these values are within the range of acceptable strains [28], a new iteration of the outer loop begins with a new external load (increasing in steps of 52.”
BackgroundIchikawa, J., Hara, T., Tamatsu, Y., & Ide, Y. (2005) · Journal of Oral Biosciences · doi:10.1016/s1349-0079(05)80032-5 · Cited by 5
Analyses of trabecular bone failure
Verhulp, E. (2006) · TU/e Research Portal · doi:10.6100/ir608109 · Cited by 6
“Although this value is consistent with those reported earlier for similar mixed experimentalnumerical approaches (Mente and Lewis, 1989; van Rietbergen et al., 1997; Hou et al., 1998; Ladd et al., 1998), significantly higher values were also found for bovine (18.7 GPa, Niebur et al., 2000) and human trabecular bone ti…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSavelli, G., Oliviero, S., Viceconti, M., & Mattina, A. A. L. (2025) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107182 · Cited by 5
Risk of bony endplate failure during vertebral fracture
Frings, N. R., & Morgan, E. F. (2025) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.106939 · Cited by 4
Self-citationRuggiero, N. J., Ciuciu, A., Sedigh, A., et al. (2025) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2025.117542 · Cited by 4
Munir, K. S., Biesiekierski, A., Wen, C., & Li, Y. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818831-6.00001-x · Cited by 4
Martelli, S. (2022) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.220301 · Cited by 4
Numerical Analyses of Fracture Mechanism of the Pelvic Ring during Side-Impact Load
Klekiel, T., Arkusz, K., Sławiński, G., et al. (2022) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma15165734 · Cited by 4
“Very important information is the yield (ultimate) stress, and the maximal strain in a failure moment because, in practice, these parameters define bone strength [18].”
BackgroundRüger, M., Seitz, A. M., Nuss, K. M. R., et al. (2022) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202202106 · Cited by 4
Poudrel, A.-S., Nguyen, V., Rosi, G., et al. (2022) · Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology · doi:10.1007/s10237-022-01667-1 · Cited by 4
Trần, T. N., Baltaci, Y., Winter, P., Tschernig, T., & Landgraeber, S. (2023) · Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger · doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2023.152081 · Cited by 4
Ciclope: micro Computed Tomography to Finite Elements
Iori, G., Crimi, G., Schileo, E., et al. (2023) · The Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.04952 · Cited by 4
Fraterrigo, G., Schileo, E., Simpson, D. J. W., Stevenson, J. D., Kendrick, B. J. L., & Taddei, F. (2023) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1120430 · Cited by 4
Mao, S., Liu, Y., Wang, F., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Bioprinting · doi:10.18063/ijb.735 · Cited by 4
“2% offset strain since the yield points were not clear[36].”
Picavet, P. P., Claeys, S., Rondia, E., & Balligand, M. H. (2024) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106442 · Cited by 5
Liu, J., Ge, Y., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28606 · Cited by 4
“Cortical and cancellous elastic modulus in osteoporotic bone would be lowered by 33% and 66%, respectively [26 – 29].”
BackgroundPoudrel, A.-S., Bouffandeau, A., Rosi, G., et al. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108405 · Cited by 4
Du, X., Zhao, X., Lei, J., et al. (2024) · Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.taml.2024.100547 · Cited by 4
Targosinski, J., Kusins, J. R., Athwal, G. S., et al. (2024) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research® · doi:10.1002/jor.25976 · Cited by 4
Clarke, G., Johnson, J. E., Netto, C. D. C., et al. (2024) · Foot & Ankle International · doi:10.1177/10711007241281294 · Cited by 4
Johnson, J. E., Clarke, G. A., Netto, C. D. C., et al. (2024) · Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics · doi:10.1177/24730114241308577 · Cited by 4
“Titanium alloy linear elastic material properties were assigned to implant geometries, while each bone element was assigned distinct isotropic, 26 nonlinear (elastic-plastic), 2,6,16 CT HU-specific 21 material properties (Figure 3).”
Liu, G., Deng, S., Chen, X., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2025.1546656 · Cited by 4
Fan, H., Wang, L., & Dou, R. (2025) · Ceramics International · doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.03.248 · Cited by 4
Dynamic Properties of Cortical Bone Tissue: Impact Tests and Numerical Study
Abdelwahab, A. A., & Silberschmidt, V. V. (2011) · Applied Mechanics and Materials · doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.70.387 · Cited by 4
Creep Simulation of a Micro-CT Based Finite Element Model of Porcine Cancellous Bone
Ertas, A. H., Sindelar, B. J., & Cotton, J. R. (2011) · ASME Summer Bioengineering Conference (SBC) · doi:10.1115/sbc2011-53320 · Cited by 4
“This has been demonstrated for elastic modulus [5] and yield stress [6].”
Finite element modeling to estimate the apparent material properties of trabecular bone
Park, S., Chae, S., Park, J. S., et al. (2013) · International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s12541-013-0199-3 · Cited by 4
Perilli, E., Baleani, M., Raatjes, W., Baruffaldi, F., Cappello, A., & Toni, A. (2005) · Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1142/s0219519405001473 · Cited by 4
Biomaterials: Joints and problems of contact interfaces
Rakin, M., & Sedmak, A. (2006) · TechnoRep (University of Belgrade – Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy) · Cited by 4
Assessing the Mechanical Weakness of Vertebrae Affected by Primary Tumors: A Feasibility Study
Palanca, M., Cristofolini, L., Gasbarrini, A., Tedesco, G., & Bròdano, G. B. (2020) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma13153256 · Cited by 4
“Indeed, the specimens were tested with loads lower than the ones associated with typical physiological activities but an alarming strain distribution with strain peaks over the typical failure limit (circa 6-fold the typical tensile fracture strain and twice the typical compressive fracture strain, which are 7000 micr…”
BackgroundInfluentialCeynowa, M., Żerdzicki, K., Kłosowski, P., et al. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241143 · Cited by 4
“In our study, we used a compression test, as was used in testing femoral head cancellous bone samples [9, 17, 25], as the best possible approximation of the forces acting on the cancellous bone in this region.”
BackgroundMethodJiang, X., Yao, Y., Tang, W., et al. (2020) · ACS Applied Bio Materials · doi:10.1021/acsabm.0c01254 · Cited by 4
Dereshgi, H. A., Serbest, K., Şahin, S. N., et al. (2021) · Journal of Smart Systems Research · Cited by 4
A Computational Approximation to Model Variation in Cancellous Bone Screw Pull-Out
Piper, A., & Brown, C. (2016) · Journal of Medical Devices · doi:10.1115/1.4032868 · Cited by 4
Falcinelli, C., Schileo, E., Baruffaldi, F., Cristofolini, L., & Taddei, F. (2016) · Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1142/s0219519417500129 · Cited by 4
Metodología para el diseño computacional de andamios a ser utilizados en reparación ósea
Reboledo-Grau, D., & Martínez, G. (2020) · Revista UIS Ingenierías · doi:10.18273/revuin.v19n4-2020025 · Cited by 4
Sahandifar, P., & Kleiven, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.3389/fmech.2021.691171 · Cited by 4
“A similar approach of CT-based models could be used to assign heterogeneous mechanical properties to the cortical and trabecular bones using bone mineral density or porosity (Bayraktar et al., 2004; Hansen et al., 2008; Ariza et al., 2015; Grassi et al., 2016; Enns-Bray et al., 2018).”
MethodResultComputational modeling of bone and bone remodeling
Gong, H., Wang, L., Zhang, M., & Fan, Y. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1533/9780857096739.2.244 · Cited by 4
Daegling, D. J., Granatosky, M. C., & McGraw, W. S. (2014) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.22682 · Cited by 4
Lü, Y. (2014) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Imaging & Visualization · doi:10.1080/21681163.2014.947385 · Cited by 4
“The bone tissue was modelled as a bilinear elastic plastic material (Bayraktar et al. 2004).”
BackgroundFan, R., Liu, J., Liu, J., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine · doi:10.1177/0954411917743275 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Bayraktar, H. H., Morgan, E. F., Niebur, G. L., Morris, G. E., Wong, E. K., & Keaveny, T. M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bayraktar, Harun H.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-35
- ISSN
- 0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089968363
- Cited by
- 1,142
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 13.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- University of California, San Francisco
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR-43784, R01AR043784, AR41481)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone fractures and treatments
- Keywords
- trabecular bone, cortical bone, femoral neck, elastic modulus, yield strain, tensile yield strength, compressive yield strength, finite element analysis
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cadaver, Computer Simulation, Elasticity, Femur Head, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Sensitivity and Specificity, Statistics as Topic, Stress, Mechanical, Tensile Strength, Reproducibility of Results, Weight-Bearing, Compressive Strength, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review