The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue
Abstract
The ability to determine trabecular bone tissue elastic and failure properties has biological and clinical importance. To date, trabecular tissue yield strains remain unknown due to experimental difficulties, and elastic moduli studies have reported controversial results. We hypothesized that the elastic and tensile and compressive yield properties of trabecular tissue are similar to those of cortical tissue. Effective tissue modulus and yield strains were calibrated for cadaveric human femoral neck specimens taken from 11 donors, using a combination of apparent-level mechanical testing and specimen-specific, high-resolution, nonlinear finite element modeling. The trabecular tissue properties were then compared to measured elastic modulus and tensile yield strain of human femoral diaphyseal cortical bone specimens obtained from a similar cohort of 34 donors. Cortical tissue properties were obtained by statistically eliminating the effects of vascular porosity. Results indicated that mean elastic modulus was 10% lower (p<0.05) for the trabecular tissue (18.0+/-2.8 GPa) than for the cortical tissue (19.9+/-1.8 GPa), and the 0.2% offset tensile yield strain was 15% lower for the trabecular tissue (0.62+/-0.04% vs. 0.73+/-0.05%, p<0.001). The tensile-compressive yield strength asymmetry for the trabecular tissue, 0.62 on average, was similar to values reported in the literature for cortical bone. We conclude that while the elastic modulus and yield strains for trabecular tissue are just slightly lower than those of cortical tissue, because of the cumulative effect of these differences, tissue strength is about 25% greater for cortical bone.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Results from this approach place the elastic modulus of human trabecular tissue at approximately 10% less, tensile yield strain at 15% less, and tensile/compressive tissue strength at 25% less than that of cortical bone (142).”
From Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States (2018) · cites this paper as [142]
Citations
Cites
The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue
Reilly, D. T., & Burstein, A. H. (1975) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(75)90075-5 · Cited by 1,533
Cowin, S. C. (2001) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b14263 · Cited by 1,456
Zysset, P. K., Guo, X.-D. E., Hoffler, C. E., Moore, K. E., & Goldstein, S. A. (1999) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00111-6 · Cited by 1,001
The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone
Gibson, L. J. (1985) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(85)90287-8 · Cited by 932
Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation
Rho, J.-Y., Tsui, T. Y., & Pharr, G. M. (1997) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00073-2 · Cited by 924
van Rietbergen, B., Weinans, H., Huiskes, R., & Odgaard, A. (1995) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(95)80008-5 · Cited by 865
Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site
Morgan, E. F., & Keaveny, T. M. (2001) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00011-2 · Cited by 705
Self-citationAging of bone tissue: mechanical properties.
Burstein, A. H., Reilly, D. T., & Martens, M. A. (1976) · PubMed · Cited by 614
Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties
Burstein, A., Reilly, D., & Martens, M. (1976) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-197658010-00015 · Cited by 569
Turner, C. H., Rho, J., Takano, Y., Tsui, T. Y., & Pharr, G. M. (1999) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00177-8 · Cited by 547
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,000
Blázquez-Carmona, P., Mora‐Macías, J., Pajares, A., Mármol, Á., & Reina-Romo, E. (2024) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1476473 · Cited by 17
Soodmand, I., Becker, A.-K., Saß, J., Jabs, C., Kebbach, M., Wanke, G., Dau, M., & Bader, R. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40668 · Cited by 17
Simpson, D. J. W., Little, J. P., Gray, H. A., et al. (2009) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.12.010 · Cited by 16
“Peak principal stresses were compared with the ultimate strength of cancellous bone under tension (100 MPa) (Bayraktar et al., 2004) and compression (133 MPa) (Reilly and Burstein, 1975).”
BackgroundGoff, M. G., Chang, K. L., Litts, E. N., & Hernandez, C. J. (2014) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.06.016 · Cited by 16
Kopp, S., Kuželka, J., Goldmann, T., et al. (2010) · Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1515/bmt.2010.053 · Cited by 16
Knowles, N. K., Ip, K. K. C., & Ferreira, L. M. (2018) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-018-02152-6 · Cited by 17
Finite element analyses for predicting anatomical neck fractures in the proximal humerus
Dahan, G., Trabelsi, N., Safran, O., et al. (2019) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.05.028 · Cited by 16
“The yield load was 119 the one that induces maximum compression strain in the FEA that equals the compression 120 yield strain proposed by [2] and [15] (for trabecular and cortical bone respectively): 121”
BackgroundMedial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in Knee Osteoarthritis—A Biomechanical Approach
Cofaru, N. F., Roman, M. D., Cofaru, I. I., Oleksik, V. S., & Fleacă, R. S. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10248972 · Cited by 16
Castillo-Paz, A. M., Londoño-Restrepo, S. M., Echeverri, C. J. O., et al. (2021) · Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101100 · Cited by 16
Hennicke, N. S., Saemann, M., Kluess, D., Bader, R., & Sander, M. (2021) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105059 · Cited by 16
Humeral short stem varus–valgus alignment affects bone stress
Tavakoli, A., Spangenberg, G. W., Reeves, J. M., Faber, K. J., & Langohr, G. D. G. (2021) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research® · doi:10.1002/jor.25239 · Cited by 16
“3.(11,12) Trabecular bone elements were assigned material properties based on CT attenuation, that varied spatially using a density‐modulus relationship of E ρ = 8920 app 1.”
MethodMulti-Scale Modeling of Human Cortical Bone: Aging and Failure Studies
Budyn, É., & Hoc, T. P. (2006) · MRS Proceedings · doi:10.1557/proc-975-0975-dd02-06 · Cited by 16
Barth, J. R. H., Garret, J., Geais, L., Bothorel, H., Saffarini, M., & Godenèche, A. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics · doi:10.1186/s40634-019-0178-4 · Cited by 16
Mori, Y., Fujisawa, H., Kamimura, M., et al. (2021) · The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1620/tjem.255.135 · Cited by 16
“However, the Young’s modulus of Ti6Al4V is still much higher than that of human cortical bone (11-20 GPa) (Bayraktar et al. 2004).”
BackgroundCT-based visualization and quantification of bone microstructure in vivo
van Lenthe, H., & Müller, R. (2008) · IBMS BoneKEy · doi:10.1138/20080348 · Cited by 16
“It has been shown that at the apparent level, these μFE models can accurately predict trabecular bone failure for bovine (39) as well as for human trabecular bone (40); the μFE-predicted apparent stresses and strains at failure were equal to experimentally measured values for the same bone specimens.”
Backgroundde Souza, J. R., Rahimnejad, M., Soares, I. P. M., Anselmi, C., Oliveira, P., dos Reis‐Prado, A. H., Maglaras, V., Dal‐Fabbro, R., Trichês, E. S., & Bottino, M. C. (2025) · Bioprinting · doi:10.1016/j.bprint.2025.e00413 · Cited by 16
Biomechanical analysis of the drilling parameters for early osteonecrosis of the femoral head
Yuan, D., Wu, Z., Yang, L., et al. (2022) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106737 · Cited by 15
Akhlaghi, P., Khorshidparast, S., & Rouhi, G. (2023) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106062 · Cited by 15
Miles, B., Kolos, E. C., Walter, W. L., et al. (2015) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.03.012 · Cited by 15
Çınar, D., & İmirzalıoğlu, P. (2016) · The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants · doi:10.11607/jomi.4048 · Cited by 15
Caouette, C., Ikin, N., Villemure, I., et al. (2016) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-016-1526-5 · Cited by 15
Lee, C.-H., Landham, P. R., Eastell, R., Adams, M. A., Dolan, P., & Yang, L. (2017) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine · doi:10.1177/0954411917708806 · Cited by 15
“To validate the model’s ability to predict the exact fracture location, different experimental procedures would be required, for example, by identifying fracture site reliably from dissections or by testing specimens with more than two vertebrae.(48) A wide range of material properties have been used for the vertebra…”
MethodDevelopment of a validated glenoid trabecular density-modulus relationship
Knowles, N. K., Langohr, G. D. G., Faieghi, R., Nelson, A. J., & Ferreira, L. M. (2018) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.10.013 · Cited by 15
Yamada, Y., Inui, T., Kinoshita, Y., et al. (2019) · Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies · doi:10.1080/21870764.2019.1595930 · Cited by 15
“Although the compressive strength of all the scaffolds was lower than that of to cortical bone, that of AFS100 and Si-AFS100 was higher than that of cancellous bone [20,21].”
BackgroundOliviero, S., Owen, R., Reilly, G. C., et al. (2020) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104190 · Cited by 15
“• The tibia fails when a portion of the nodes (2%, 4%, 6%, 8% or 10%) reaches a critical tensile (irst principal) strain of 8000 με, which has been reported to be the yield strain in tension for bone of different species (Bayraktar et al., 2004).”
BackgroundKok, J., Grassi, L., Gustafsson, A., & Isaksson, H. (2021) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110445 · Cited by 15
Mattina, A. A. L., Baruffaldi, F., Taylor, M., & Viceconti, M. (2022) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-022-03050-8 · Cited by 16
Endplate volumetric bone mineral density biomechanically matched interbody cage
Weng, Y., Di, M., Wu, T., Ma, X., Yang, Q., & Lu, W. W. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.1075574 · Cited by 15
“By comparing the calculated results with other published measurements (Kaneko et al., 2003; Bayraktar et al., 2004; Duchemin et al., 2008), the validity of mentioned theories on calculating compressive elastic modulus of endplate cortical bone was confirmed.”
ResultMeisterhans, M., Flury, A., Zindel, C., et al. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics · doi:10.1186/s40634-023-00597-w · Cited by 15
The Mechanical Behavior of Bone
Karim, L., Hussein, A. I., Morgan, E. F., & Bouxsein, M. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-415853-5.00019-4 · Cited by 15
Self-citationLandgraf, R., Ihlemann, J., Kolmeder, S., Lion, A., Lebsack, H., & Kober, C. (2015) · ZAMM ‐ Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik · doi:10.1002/zamm.201400064 · Cited by 15
“Reported values for the yield stress of bone tissue are in the range of 100 − 200 MPa (see, for example, [4, 6, 46]).”
Modeling and simulation of chemomechanics at the cell-matrix interface
Krishnan, R., Oommen, B., Walton, E. B., Maloney, J. M., & Vliet, K. J. V. (2008) · Cell Adhesion & Migration · doi:10.4161/cam.2.2.6154 · Cited by 15
Optimal SVM parameter selection for non-separable and unbalanced datasets
Jiang, P., Missoum, S., & Chen, Z. (2014) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-014-1105-z · Cited by 15
“, fracture) is assessed using the maximum principal strain both in tension and compression (Bayraktar et al. 2004).”
MethodIchikawa, J., Hara, T., Tamatsu, Y., & Ide, Y. (2007) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.05.016 · Cited by 15
Bettamer, A., Hambli, R., Allaoui, S., & Almhdie-Imjabbar, A. (2015) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Imaging & Visualization · doi:10.1080/21681163.2015.1079505 · Cited by 15
“…have been positively correlated with applied strain following a power law relationship (Keaveny et al. 1994, 1999; Niebur et al. 2000; Keaveny et al. 2001; Morgan & Keaveny 2001; Arthur Moore & Gibson 2002; Bayraktar et al. 2004; Nagaraja et al. 2005; Nalla et al. 2005; Wolfram et al. 2011).”
BackgroundAbe, S., Narra, N., Nikander, R., Hyttinen, J., Kouhia, R., & Sievänen, H. T. (2018) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.05.037 · Cited by 15
Jang, C.-Y., Bang, S.-H., Kim, W., Lee, S., Lee, H., Kwak, D.-K., & Yoo, J. (2019) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2019.08.014 · Cited by 15
Awal, R., Naznin, M., & Faisal, T. R. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125916 · Cited by 16
Jonnala, U. K., Kumar, Y. R., Gibson, I., & Panwisawas, C. (2025) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114938 · Cited by 14
Bianchi, D., Falcinelli, C., Molinari, L., Gizzi, A., & Martino, A. C. D. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11102850 · Cited by 14
Improving bioactivity in 3D-printed Ti-6Al-4V alloy scaffold via CaO-MgO-SiO2 glass-ceramic coating
Chen, Y., Hsiao, H., Wang, C., et al. (2023) · Journal of Alloys and Compounds · doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.173387 · Cited by 14
McDonnell, P., Harrison, N. M., & McHugh, P. E. (2010) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.02.005 · Cited by 14
Jing-guang, Q., Song, Y.-W., Tang, X., et al. (2008) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.09.007 · Cited by 14
“Bayraktar et al. (2004) examined and compared elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissues.”
BackgroundNguyen, L. H., & Schillinger, D. (2017) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2017.11.014 · Cited by 14
From Tension to Compression: Asymmetric Mechanical Behaviour of Trabecular Bone’s Organic Phase
Xie, S., Wallace, R. J., Callanan, A., & Pankaj, P. (2018) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-018-2009-7 · Cited by 14
Cement augmentation of metastatic lesions in the proximal femur can improve bone strength
Sas, A., Camp, D. V., Lauwers, B., et al. (2020) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103648 · Cited by 14
Jing, T., Liu, Y., Xu, L. M., et al. (2022) · Journal of Biomaterials Applications · doi:10.1177/08853282211065621 · Cited by 14
Fernández, M. P., Schwiedrzik, J. J., Bürki, A., Peyrin, F., Michler, J., Zysset, P. K., & Wolfram, U. (2023) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2023.04.038 · Cited by 14
Elastic Modulus of Cetacean Auditory Ossicles
Tubelli, A. A., Zosuls, A., Ketten, D. R., et al. (2014) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.22896 · Cited by 14
“…interior bone here) modulus (Roy et al., 1999; Turner et al., 1999; Hengsberger et al., 2002), the results are in contrast with the typical result that cortical bone has a higher macroscopic elastic modulus than trabecular bone (Rho et al., 1993, 1999; Zysset et al., 1999; Bayraktar et al., 2004).”
ResultWee, H., Armstrong, A. D., Flint, W. W., et al. (2015) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research® · doi:10.1002/jor.22933 · Cited by 14
“For trabecular bone 10MPa was selected for the risk threshold of failure, noting that bone is a heterogeneous, anisotropic nanocomposite material, bone remodels in vivo, and there is uncertainty in the literature as to its failure strength and strain.(38,39) Separately, a macroscopic continuum FE model of a full three…”
BackgroundDickinson, A., Taylor, A. C., & Browne, M. (2009) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine · doi:10.1243/09544119jeim679 · Cited by 14
“The femoral neck fracture risk was assessed quantitatively by calculating a risk factor (RF) for each element [36, 39-42], as the ratio of the greater of its tensile and compressive principal strains to a tensile or compressive yield strain from in-vitro data [43].”
MethodUse of finite element analysis to assess bone strength
Morgan, E. F., & Bouxsein, M. (2005) · BoneKEy-Osteovision · doi:10.1138/20050187 · Cited by 14
“This pilot study reported that vertebral strength increased 20%, whereas BMD increased only 6%, after 1 year of intermittent PTH treatment.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationHorns, J. J., Jung, R., & Carrier, D. R. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.125831 · Cited by 14
“73% (Bayraktar et al., 2004), whereas the peak strains we imposed on the metacarpals were approximately 0.”
BackgroundInfluentialFan, R., Gong, H., Zhang, R., Gao, J., Jia, Z., & Hu, Y. (2016) · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4032798 · Cited by 14
Elastic Modulus of Osteoporotic Mouse Femur Based on Femoral Head Compression Test
Chon, C.-S., Yun, H., Kim, H. S., & Ko, C. (2017) · Applied Bionics and Biomechanics · doi:10.1155/2017/7201769 · Cited by 14
Finite element analysis of a ram brain during impact under wet and dry horn conditions
Johnson, K. L., Trim, M., Mao, Y., et al. (2021) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104400 · Cited by 14
Zhang, X., Ma, Y., Li, Y.-G., Wang, P., Wang, Y., & Luo, Y. (2012) · Frontiers of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s11706-012-0181-5 · Cited by 14
Risk of Interprosthetic Femur Fracture Is Associated with Implant Spacing—A Biomechanical Study
Mühling, M., Sandriesser, S., Glowalla, C., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12093095 · Cited by 13
QCT-based 3D finite element modeling to assess patient-specific hip fracture risk and risk factors
Awal, R., & Faisal, T. R. (2023) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106299 · Cited by 13
Strain rate dependency of bovine trabecular bone under impact loading at sideways fall velocity
Enns-Bray, W. S., Ferguson, S. J., & Helgason, B. (2018) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.04.042 · Cited by 13
A residual-driven local iterative corrector scheme for the multiscale finite element method
Nguyen, L. H., & Schillinger, D. (2018) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.030 · Cited by 13
“3) [83, 84] and void voxels carry (10−5 GPa, 0.”
BackgroundZiaeipoor, H., Martelli, S., Pandy, M. G., et al. (2018) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.12.001 · Cited by 13
Knowles, N. K., Kusins, J. R., Columbus, M. P., et al. (2021) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research® · doi:10.1002/jor.25229 · Cited by 13
“This study used a bilinear constitutive model originally developed from normal bone samples and this may not be representative of variations in trabecular tissue‐level properties.(9,17) The development of more robust nonlinear material models incorporating damage, especially in OA bone, may improve the agreement betwe…”
MethodAllografts: expanding the surgeon’s armamentarium
Ahmed, N., Eras, V., Prüß, A., et al. (2022) · Cell and Tissue Banking · doi:10.1007/s10561-022-10015-7 · Cited by 13
Farlay, D., Falgayrac, G., Ponçon, C., Rizzo, S., Cortet, B., Chapurlat, R. D., Penel, G., Badoud, I., Ammann, P., & Boivin, G. (2022) · Bone Reports · doi:10.1016/j.bonr.2022.101623 · Cited by 14
The Importance of Intrinsic Damage Properties to Bone Fragility: A Finite Element Study
Hardisty, M., Zauel, R. R., Stover, S. M., & Fyhrie, D. P. (2012) · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4023090 · Cited by 13
Uncertainty quantification for personalized analyses of human proximal femurs
Wille, H., Ruess, M., Rank, E., et al. (2015) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.11.013 · Cited by 13
Optimal bone structure is dependent on the interplay between mechanics and cellular activities
Frame, J. C., Rohan, P., Corté, L., et al. (2018) · Mechanics Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.mechrescom.2018.07.005 · Cited by 13
“A higher Young’s modulus value was chosen in our model because 20 GPa is a more realistic value for the maximum possible Young’s modulus of cortical bone [35,36,38] .”
MethodMalekipour, F., Oetomo, D., & Lee, P. V. S. (2016) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.05.016 · Cited by 13
“…been extensively used to 71 determine the tissue-level elastic modulus (Kabel et al., 1999; Ladd and Kinney, 1998; 72 Van Rietbergen et al., 1997), as well as yield stress and strain of trabecular bone 73 (Bayraktar et al., 2004; Nagaraja et al., 2005; Niebur et al., 2000; Verhulp et al., 2008).”
MethodAdams, M. F., Bayraktar, H. H., Keaveny, T. M., et al. (2003) · Proceedings - Supercomputing · doi:10.1145/1048935.1050177 · Cited by 13
“Although the initial setup in Athena (1) and to a lesser extent the mesh setup cost in Prometheus (3), represents a significant portion of the time in the numerical experiments, because only one linear system is solved, these costs are amortized in nonlinear simulations which constitute the predominant use of our fini…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationMechanical properties of whole-body human bones: a review
Verma, S., Singh, G., Choudhary, A., Hussain, S., & Chanda, A. (2026) · Materials Research Express · doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ae45f3 · Cited by 12
Koivumäki, J. (2013) · Cited by 12
LIPSS pattern induced by polymer surface instability for myoblast cell guidance
Kasálková, N. S., Juřicová, V., Rimpelová, S., et al. (2024) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2024.110667 · Cited by 12
“The elastic moduli of reinforced composites, such as CFR-PEEK (carbon fiber reinforced PEEK), can be as high as 18 GPa [11], bringing them significantly closer to the value of cortical bone (19.9 ± 1.8 GPa) [12].”
BackgroundInfluentialAkbas, O., Greuling, A., & Stiesch, M. (2024) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106530 · Cited by 15
Raftery, K. A., Kargarzadeh, A., Tavana, S., & Newell, N. (2024) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1511685 · Cited by 12
Bioactive and fatigue-resistant Ti–Ta alloy by additive manufacturing for orthopedic applications
Liu, Q., Zhang, Y., Chen, W., et al. (2025) · Smart Materials in Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.smmf.2025.100086 · Cited by 12
Viscoelastic Responses of the Lumbar Spine during Prolonged Stooping
Shin, G., Mirka, G. A., & Loboa, E. G. (2005) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120504901401 · Cited by 12
Ferguson, V. L., & Olesiak, S. E. (2019) · doi:10.1201/9780429111556-7 · Cited by 12
Hernandez, C. J. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3305-1_2 · Cited by 12
Xu, J., Zhan, S., Ling, M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research · doi:10.1186/s13018-020-01867-4 · Cited by 12
“0073) reported in previous studies [25, 26].”
Immel, K., Nguyen, V., Dubory, A., et al. (2021) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104607 · Cited by 12
Khorshidparast, S., Akhlaghi, P., Rouhi, G., & Barikani, H. (2022) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105566 · Cited by 12
Monea, A. G., Pastrav, L., Mulier, M., et al. (2012) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1080/10255842.2012.681644 · Cited by 12
“As the simulations assumed continuous pressure on the prosthesis head without relaxation periods in between the loading steps, the stress in bone may be overestimated, showing values close to the yield stress of bone (Van Rietbergen et al. 1998; Bayraktar et al. 2004;).”
BackgroundA novel hypothesis for the formation of conoidal projectile wounds in sandwich bones
Rickman, J. M., & Shackel, J. (2018) · International Journal of Legal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00414-018-1946-x · Cited by 12
Özkal, F. M., Çakır, F., & Şensöz, E. (2020) · Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering · doi:10.1007/s40846-020-00528-5 · Cited by 12
Fang, Y., Morse, L. R., Nguyen, N., Battaglino, R. A., Goldstein, R. F., & Troy, K. L. (2020) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-020-05610-x · Cited by 12
Kusins, J. R., Knowles, N. K., Ryan, M. K., Dall’Ara, E., & Ferreira, L. M. (2020) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110101 · Cited by 12
Modeling the Mechanical Consequences of Age-Related Trabecular Bone Loss by XFEM Simulation
Fan, R., Gong, H., Zhang, X., Liu, J., Jia, Z., & Zhu, D. (2016) · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · doi:10.1155/2016/3495152 · Cited by 12
“When the tensile or compressive principal strain in the FE model exceeded the tensile or compressive tissue yield strain, the postyield tissue elastic modulus was set to 5% of the initial elastic modulus [37, 38].”
BackgroundMinku, Scerrato, D., Bersani, A. M., et al. (2026) · Mathematics and Mechanics of Complex Systems · doi:10.2140/memocs.2026.14.205 · Cited by 11
Nanostructured biomimetic, bioresponsive, and bioactive biomaterials
Raghvendra, K. M. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-102205-4.00002-7 · Cited by 11
Brum, J. R., Macedo, F., de Oliveira, M. L. B., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry · doi:10.4317/jced.57387 · Cited by 11
Wu, W., Song, L., Liu, J., et al. (2023) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-023-03641-4 · Cited by 11
Gustafsson, A., Galteri, G., Barakat, A., Engqvist, J., Grassi, L., Cristofolini, L., Dejea, H., & Isaksson, H. (2024) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106721 · Cited by 11
Smit, T., Aage, N., Haschtmann, D., Ferguson, S. J., & Helgason, B. (2024) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1347961 · Cited by 11
An Equivalent Constitutive Model of Cancellous Bone With Fracture Prediction
Salem, M., Westover, L., Adeeb, S., & Duke, K. (2020) · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4047080 · Cited by 11
Aguirre, T. G., Ingrole, A., Fuller, L. H., Seek, T. W., Fiorillo, A. R., Sertich, J. J. W., & Donahue, S. W. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237042 · Cited by 11
“The compressive yield strain (8,300 +/- 100 microstrain) of trabecular bone was used because it is remarkably similar across a large range of relative densities and animals with a large range of body masses [45, 46].”
MethodIbrahim, H. (2022) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.97899 · Cited by 11
Nadda, R., Repaka, R., & Sahani, A. K. (2022) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1080/10255842.2022.2095204 · Cited by 11
Zhou, H., Xu, D., Quan, W., Ugbolue, U. C., & Gu, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1337540 · Cited by 11
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN METATARSAL BONES
Danesi, V., Cristofolini, L., Juszczyk, M., et al. (2011) · Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1142/s0219519412005034 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Bayraktar, H. H., Morgan, E. F., Niebur, G. L., Morris, G. E., Wong, E. K., & Keaveny, T. M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bayraktar, Harun H.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-35
- ISSN
- 0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089968363
- Cited by
- 1,142
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 13.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- University of California, San Francisco
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR-43784, R01AR043784, AR41481)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone fractures and treatments
- Keywords
- trabecular bone, cortical bone, femoral neck, elastic modulus, yield strain, tensile yield strength, compressive yield strength, finite element analysis
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cadaver, Computer Simulation, Elasticity, Femur Head, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Sensitivity and Specificity, Statistics as Topic, Stress, Mechanical, Tensile Strength, Reproducibility of Results, Weight-Bearing, Compressive Strength, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review