The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue
Abstract
The ability to determine trabecular bone tissue elastic and failure properties has biological and clinical importance. To date, trabecular tissue yield strains remain unknown due to experimental difficulties, and elastic moduli studies have reported controversial results. We hypothesized that the elastic and tensile and compressive yield properties of trabecular tissue are similar to those of cortical tissue. Effective tissue modulus and yield strains were calibrated for cadaveric human femoral neck specimens taken from 11 donors, using a combination of apparent-level mechanical testing and specimen-specific, high-resolution, nonlinear finite element modeling. The trabecular tissue properties were then compared to measured elastic modulus and tensile yield strain of human femoral diaphyseal cortical bone specimens obtained from a similar cohort of 34 donors. Cortical tissue properties were obtained by statistically eliminating the effects of vascular porosity. Results indicated that mean elastic modulus was 10% lower (p<0.05) for the trabecular tissue (18.0+/-2.8 GPa) than for the cortical tissue (19.9+/-1.8 GPa), and the 0.2% offset tensile yield strain was 15% lower for the trabecular tissue (0.62+/-0.04% vs. 0.73+/-0.05%, p<0.001). The tensile-compressive yield strength asymmetry for the trabecular tissue, 0.62 on average, was similar to values reported in the literature for cortical bone. We conclude that while the elastic modulus and yield strains for trabecular tissue are just slightly lower than those of cortical tissue, because of the cumulative effect of these differences, tissue strength is about 25% greater for cortical bone.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Results from this approach place the elastic modulus of human trabecular tissue at approximately 10% less, tensile yield strain at 15% less, and tensile/compressive tissue strength at 25% less than that of cortical bone (142).”
From Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States (2018) · cites this paper as [142]
Citations
Cites
The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue
Reilly, D. T., & Burstein, A. H. (1975) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(75)90075-5 · Cited by 1,533
Cowin, S. C. (2001) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b14263 · Cited by 1,456
Zysset, P. K., Guo, X.-D. E., Hoffler, C. E., Moore, K. E., & Goldstein, S. A. (1999) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00111-6 · Cited by 1,001
The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone
Gibson, L. J. (1985) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(85)90287-8 · Cited by 932
Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation
Rho, J.-Y., Tsui, T. Y., & Pharr, G. M. (1997) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00073-2 · Cited by 924
van Rietbergen, B., Weinans, H., Huiskes, R., & Odgaard, A. (1995) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(95)80008-5 · Cited by 865
Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site
Morgan, E. F., & Keaveny, T. M. (2001) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00011-2 · Cited by 705
Self-citationAging of bone tissue: mechanical properties.
Burstein, A. H., Reilly, D. T., & Martens, M. A. (1976) · PubMed · Cited by 614
Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties
Burstein, A., Reilly, D., & Martens, M. (1976) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-197658010-00015 · Cited by 569
Turner, C. H., Rho, J., Takano, Y., Tsui, T. Y., & Pharr, G. M. (1999) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00177-8 · Cited by 547
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,000
Measuring strain using digital image correlation of second harmonic generation images
Wentzell, S., Nesbitt, R. S., Macione, J., et al. (2013) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.06.003 · Cited by 11
Helgason, B., Stirnimann, P., Widmer, R. P., Böger, A., & Ferguson, S. J. (2012) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.32847 · Cited by 11
Helgason, B., Stirnimann, P., Widmer, R. P., & Ferguson, S. J. (2011) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.31886 · Cited by 11
Bahia, M. T., Hecke, M. B., & Mercuri, E. G. F. (2019) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.05.005 · Cited by 11
O’Rourke, D., & Taylor, M. (2020) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research® · doi:10.1002/jor.24636 · Cited by 11
A systematic approach to the scale separation problem in the development of multiscale models
Bhattacharya, P., Li, Q., Lacroix, D. J., Kadirkamanathan, V., & Viceconti, M. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251297 · Cited by 11
“Ex vivo experiments on small samples of bone material excised from the human femur and tested to failure provide evidence for its brittleness at small strains [39].”
BackgroundHarmony, T. C. Y., Yusof, N., Ramalingam, S., et al. (2021) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/corr.0000000000001968 · Cited by 11
“The Young modulus values of our study were lower compared with preexisting studies [4, 35, 50], and this may have been attributed to the method of measurement of strain employed, such as direct measurement of relative displacement of the compression platens through cross head movement.”
Result3D finite element simulation of human proximal femoral fracture under quasi-static load
Hambli, R. (2013) · Advances in Biomechanics and Applications · doi:10.12989/aba.2013.1.1.001 · Cited by 11
“…finite element simulation of human proximal femoral fracture under quasi-static load suggesting that it exhibits a quasi-brittle material behaviour (Reilly and Burstein 1975, Keaveny et al. 1999, Currey 2002, Kaneko et al.2003, Kotha and Guzelsu 2003, Bayraktar et al. 2004).”
BackgroundFinite element modelling of the developing infant femur using paired CT and MRI scans
Castro, A. P. G., Altai, Z., Offiah, A. C., et al. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218268 · Cited by 11
Post-yield relaxation behavior of bovine cancellous bone
Burgers, T. A., Lakes, R. S., García-Rodríguez, S., Piller, G. R., & Ploeg, H.-L. (2009) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.08.005 · Cited by 10
“Finite element analysis has also been used to determine the static tensile and compressive post-yield behavior of cancellous bone (Bayraktar et al., 2004).”
MethodSadoughi, S., Bevill, G. R., Morgan, E. F., Palepu, V., Keaveny, T. M., & Wear, K. A. (2022) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1080/10255842.2022.2069465 · Cited by 10
“Voxel-type finite element models were created for each specimen by converting each voxel into an 8-noded brick element (Bayraktar et al. 2004).”
MethodSelf-citationReiner, E., Weston, F., Pleshko, N. L., & Querido, W. (2023) · Applied Spectroscopy · doi:10.1177/00037028231201427 · Cited by 10
“6 8 Femoral fragility fractures are associated with signi fi cant morbidity and mortality for the elderly population, in particular, with the disease osteoporosis.”
BackgroundDanesi, V., Erani, P., Brandolini, N., Juszczyk, M., & Cristofolini, L. (2016) · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4034383 · Cited by 10
Sartuqui, J., D’Elía, N. L., Ercoli, D., Sánchez‐deAlcázar, D., Cortajarena, A. L., & Messina, P. V. (2019) · Materials Today Communications · doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.01.004 · Cited by 10
Mishra, D., & Basu, B. (2023) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106310 · Cited by 10
Maquer, G., Mueri, C., Henderson, A., Bischoff, J. E., & Favre, P. (2024) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-024-03452-w · Cited by 10
“A phantomless calibration scheme was implemented to calculate the apparent density [51, 52] that was used to determine the elastic modulus based on the power law relationship for trabecular bone from multiple anatomic sites [53].”
Yan, Y., QI, W., Qiu, T.-X., Teo, E.-C., & Lei, W. (2012) · Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1142/s0219519412500923 · Cited by 10
Modeling orthotropic elasticity, localized plasticity and fracture in trabecular bone
O'Connor, D. T., Elkhodary, K. I., Fouad, Y., Greene, M. S., Sabet, F. A., Qian, J., Zhang, Y. J., Liu, W. K., & Jasiuk, I. (2016) · Computational Mechanics · doi:10.1007/s00466-016-1301-3 · Cited by 10
Rate and age-dependent damage elasticity formulation for efficient hip fracture simulations
Villette, C. C., & Phillips, A. (2018) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.07.016 · Cited by 10
Noordin, M. A., Rahim, R. A. A., Roslan, A. N. H., et al. (2020) · Journal of Bionic Engineering · doi:10.1007/s42235-020-0029-0 · Cited by 10
“, Bayraktar et al.([48]) and Townsend and Rose([49]) which stated that the range of cancellous bone modulus is 0.”
BackgroundInfluentialEffect of sitting posture on pelvic injury risk under vertical loading
Tse, K. M., Robinson, D. L., Franklyn, M., Zhang, J. Y., Spratley, E. M., Salzar, R. S., Fernandez, J., Ackland, D. C., & Lee, P. V. S. (2020) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103780 · Cited by 10
Comparison of femur strain under different loading scenarios: Experimental testing
Levadnyi, I., Awrejcewicz, J., Zhang, Y., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine · doi:10.1177/0954411920951033 · Cited by 10
“However, the strain magnitude of healthy bone is much lower than the bone’s ultimate compressive and tensile strength.(34,35) Figure 9.”
BackgroundModelling fracture processes in bones
Abdelwahab, A. A., Li, S., & Silberschmidt, V. V. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1533/9780857096739.2.268 · Cited by 10
Bone Anisotropy - Analytical and Finite Element Analysis
Vignoli, L., & Kenedi, P. P. (2016) · Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures · doi:10.1590/1679-78251814 · Cited by 10
A NEW PARADIGM FOR THE IN VITRO SIMULATION OF SIDEWAYS FALL LOADING OF THE PROXIMAL HUMAN FEMUR
Zani, L., Cristofolini, L., Juszczyk, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1142/s0219519414500055 · Cited by 10
Donaldson, F. E., Nyman, E., & Coburn, J. (2015) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.04.037 · Cited by 10
Laurent, C. P., Böhme, B., Mengoni, M., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine · doi:10.1177/0954411916644269 · Cited by 10
Fatigue reliability analysis for medial tibial stress syndrome
Ghasemi, S. H., Kalantari, H., Abdollahikho, S. S., et al. (2019) · Materials Science and Engineering C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.076 · Cited by 10
Laurent, C. P., Böhme, B., Verwaerde, J., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine · doi:10.1177/0954411919882603 · Cited by 10
Koyama, T., Mori, Y., Kamimura, M., et al. (2024) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106820 · Cited by 9
Vertebroplasty reduces progressive ׳creep’ deformity of fractured vertebrae
Luo, J., Pollintine, P., Annesley-Williams, D., Dolan, P., & Adams, M. A. (2015) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.006 · Cited by 9
“Creep strains in the present experiment were measured in the cortex, but probably reflect deformations of both cortical and trabecular bone, which have similar yield strains (Bayraktar et al., 2004).”
BackgroundAwal, R., Hmida, J. B., Luo, Y., et al. (2022) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-022-02516-0 · Cited by 9
Structural features of subchondral bone cysts and adjacent tissues in hip osteoarthritis
Nakasone, A., Guang, Y., Wise, A., Kim, L., Babbin, J., Rathod, S., Mitchell, A. J., Gerstenfeld, L. C., & Morgan, E. F. (2022) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2022.03.013 · Cited by 9
Self-citationQuantitative Evaluation of the 3D Anatomy of the Human Osseous Spiral Lamina Using MicroCT
Braga, G. O. B., Parrilli, A., Zboray, R., et al. (2023) · Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology · doi:10.1007/s10162-023-00904-3 · Cited by 9
Tse, K. M., Tan, L. B., Lee, S. J., et al. (2018) · Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2018.05.026 · Cited by 9
Wang, J., Zhou, B., Hu, Y., Zhang, Z., Yu, Y., Nawathe, S., Nishiyama, K. K., Keaveny, T. M., Shane, E. J., & Guo, X.-D. E. (2019) · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4042680 · Cited by 9
Self-citationLength scale parameter of single trabecula in cancellous bone
Khorshidi, M. A. (2020) · Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology · doi:10.1007/s10237-020-01316-5 · Cited by 9
Ni, M., Zhang, F., Mei, J., et al. (2020) · Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine · doi:10.3892/etm.2020.8898 · Cited by 9
“Only with the DIS alone, the bone stresses were within the normal range of trabecular and cortical bone (19).”
Can neck fractures in proximal humeri be predicted by CT-based FEA?
Dahan, G., Safran, O., & Zohar Yosibash, A. (2022) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111039 · Cited by 9
Emerzian, S. R., Wu, T., Vaidya, R., Tang, S. Y., Abergel, R. J., & Keaveny, T. M. (2023) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.4828 · Cited by 9
“787 394 (47) 312 (44) 472 (72) 381 (58) Stiffness (kN/mm) 0.”
Self-citationChristen, D., Zwahlen, A., & Müller, R. (2013) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.10.010 · Cited by 9
Özçivici, E., Zhang, W., Donahue, L. R., et al. (2014) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2014.03.042 · Cited by 9
Lin, W., Mittra, E., & Qin, Y. (2005) · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.2132369 · Cited by 9
Seong, W., Kim, H., Jeong, S., et al. (2011) · PubMed · Cited by 9
Mechanical biocompatibility of dental materials
John, K. R. S. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100884-3.00002-3 · Cited by 9
Ferraz, C., Barros, R., Ferraz, F., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry · doi:10.4317/jced.55945 · Cited by 9
“This approach was chosen because it considers the different impacts of stress (traction and compression) and damage in the bone (29).”
BackgroundPekedis, M., Yörük, M. D., Binboğa, E., et al. (2021) · Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy · doi:10.1007/s00276-021-02762-1 · Cited by 9
A Novel Method for Determining the Time and Location of Abrupt Fracture Initiation in Bones
Juszczyk, M., Cristofolini, L., Kaniuk, J., et al. (2010) · The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design · doi:10.1243/03093247jsa623 · Cited by 9
Yuan, D., Wu, Z., Luo, S., et al. (2022) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2022/3667891 · Cited by 8
“As shown in Figure 7(e), the maximum equivalent stress in the femoral neck region was less than the yield strength value of the cortical bone (104MPa) [37].”
BackgroundFormica, M., Zanirato, A., Bori, E., et al. (2023) · Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00402-023-05080-w · Cited by 8
Chauhan, N. P. S., Ashtari, B., Eftekhari, B. S., Akhshik, M., Maria, H. J., Khosravimelal, S., Seifalian, N., Thomas, S., Gholipourmalekabadi, M., & Seifalian, A. M. (2025) · Biomaterials Advances · doi:10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214421 · Cited by 8
Wili, P., Maquer, G., Panyasantisuk, J., & Zysset, P. K. (2017) · Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology · doi:10.1007/s10237-017-0928-0 · Cited by 8
Mechanical properties of cancellous tissue in compression test and nanoindentation
Kokot, G., Makuch, A., Skalski, K., et al. (2018) · Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering · doi:10.3233/bme-180999 · Cited by 8
A comparison of density–modulus relationships used in finite element modeling of the shoulder
Knowles, N. K., Langohr, G. D. G., Faieghi, R., Nelson, A. J., & Ferreira, L. M. (2019) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.02.005 · Cited by 8
Achour, A. B., Petto, C., Meißner, H., et al. (2021) · Biotribology · doi:10.1016/j.biotri.2021.100198 · Cited by 8
Geometry and bone mineral density determinants of femoral neck strength changes following exercise
O’Rourke, D., Beck, B. R., Harding, A. T., Watson, S. L., Pivonka, P., & Martelli, S. (2022) · Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology · doi:10.1007/s10237-022-01642-w · Cited by 8
Haider, I. T., Loundagin, L. L., Sawatsky, A., Kostenuik, P. J., Boyd, S. K., & Edwards, W. B. (2022) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.4758 · Cited by 8
“In the 12-month DMAb group, we were also able to detect greater dry and ash density, resulting in increased initial modulus and energy dissipation; this finding is consistent with the well-established relationships between porosity, density, and stiffness of bone.((46,47)) We did not detect differences in ash fraction…”
ResultGoreninskii, S., Акимченко, И. О., Vorobyev, A. M., Анатольевич, К. М., Efremov, Y. M., Sudarev, E. A., Timashev, P. S., Zvyagin, A. V., Больбасов, Е. Н., & Tverdokhlebov, S. I. (2025) · Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2025.114777 · Cited by 9
A non‐linear homogeneous model for bone‐like materials under compressive load
Mengoni, M., Voide, R., de Bien, C., et al. (2011) · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cnm.1473 · Cited by 8
“Other models describe the non-linear behavior of bone not as plasticity but as a bilinear elastic behavior, considering a reduction of the Young’s modulus beyond a given strain level [17, 18, 19].”
BackgroundMechanical behavior of human bones with different saturation levels
Cammarata, M., Nicoletti, F., Paola, M. D., et al. (2016) · doi:10.3390/ecm-2-b003 · Cited by 8
Lü, Y., Liu, Y., Wu, C., et al. (2018) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-018-1994-x · Cited by 8
Shi, M. G., Hassan, M. T. Z., & Meguid, S. A. (2019) · International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design · doi:10.1007/s10999-019-09450-4 · Cited by 8
Biesiekierski, A., Munir, K. S., Li, Y., et al. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818831-6.00004-5 · Cited by 8
Saviour, C. M., Chowdhury, J. B., & Gupta, S. (2022) · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4055760 · Cited by 8
Effect of screw position on bone tissue differentiation within a fixed femoral fracture
Nasr, S., Hunt, S., & Duncan, N. A. (2013) · Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering · doi:10.4236/jbise.2013.612a009 · Cited by 8
“The magnitude of maximum principal strain within bone was less than the limit values defined by the strain criterion [50,54].”
BackgroundMethodTAWARA, D., Sakamoto, J., Murakami, H., Kawahara, N., Juhachi, O. D. A., & Tomita, K. (2010) · Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering · doi:10.1299/jbse.5.499 · Cited by 8
Lü, Y., Engelke, K., Püschel, K., Morlock, M. M., & Huber, G. (2014) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.05.001 · Cited by 8
Fuentes, E., de Viteri, V. S., Igartua, A., et al. (2010) · Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials · doi:10.5301/jabb.2010.6092 · Cited by 8
Jayme, S. J., Ramalho, P. R., de Franco, L., et al. (2015) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000002083 · Cited by 8
“The Mohr–Coulomb criterion was used to quantify the risk of damage in the structural level, which in turn effects bone remodeling,(38) taking into account the difference in the impact of compressive and tensile stresses in a brittle material like bone.(39) Tensile yield strength of 82.”
MethodValente, G., Pitto, L., Schileo, E., et al. (2017) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.01.017 · Cited by 8
“73% tensile (Bayraktar et al., 2004), εmax is the maximum strain recorded in the femur.”
BackgroundInfluentialA new evolutionary optimization method for osteoporotic bone augmentation
Artiles, M. E. S., & Venetsanos, D. T. (2017) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1080/10255842.2017.1291805 · Cited by 8
“To this end, the maximum (εmax) and minimum (εmin) element principal strains should be within the allowable yield strain values of 0.73% in tension and −1.04% in compression (Bayraktar et al. 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialJohnson, J. E., Brouillette, M. J., Permeswaran, P., Miller, B. J., & Goetz, J. E. (2020) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109825 · Cited by 8
Wu, Q., Ghosh, R. R., Wei, X., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Mechanical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106431 · Cited by 8
A microstrain comparison of passively fitting screw-retained and cemented titanium frameworks
de Vasconcellos, D. K., Kojima, A. N., Mesquita, A. M. M., et al. (2014) · Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.018 · Cited by 8
Regional variation of the cortical and trabecular bone material properties in the rabbit skull
Wang, L., Meloro, C., Fagan, M. J., Kissane, R. W. P., Bates, K. T., Askew, G. N., & Watson, P. J. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0298621 · Cited by 7
Je, D.-Y., Kim, J. W., Lee, S. J., et al. (2024) · Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery · doi:10.4055/cios23234 · Cited by 7
Finite element analysis safety of tibial cortex transverse transport
Su, H., Zhen, P., Hou, J., et al. (2025) · Bone and Joint Research · doi:10.1302/2046-3758.144.bjr-2024-0157.r1 · Cited by 7
Kuah, K. X., Salehi, M., Blackwood, D. J., et al. (2025) · Materials Science and Engineering A · doi:10.1016/j.msea.2025.148649 · Cited by 7
Chen, S., Liao, K., Yang, Y., et al. (2025) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma18184399 · Cited by 7
“In addition, its yield strength (210 ± 8.878 MPa) [25] far exceeds the yield strength of human bone (133.6 ± 34.1 MPa) [26], which can meet the needs of daily human movement load-bearing.”
InfluentialHuman Disc Nucleotomy Alters Annulus Fibrosus Mechanics at Both Reference and Compressed Loads
Claeson, A. A., Vresilovic, E. J., Showalter, B. L., et al. (2019) · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4043874 · Cited by 7
Mesh‐independent damage model for trabecular bone fracture simulation and experimental validation
Do, X. N., Hambli, R., & Ganghoffer, J. (2021) · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cnm.3468 · Cited by 7
Wearne, L. S., Rapagna, S., Awadalla, M., Keene, G. C. R., Taylor, M., & Perilli, E. (2023) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106347 · Cited by 7
Saß, J., Saemann, M., Kebbach, M., Soodmand, E., Wree, A., Bader, R., & Kluess, D. (2024) · Life · doi:10.3390/life14070841 · Cited by 7
“An asymmetric maximum-strain-based failure criterion ( ε tensile = 0.0073, ε compression = 0.0104) was adopted to calculate the femoral strength [42].”
MethodInfluentialIn Silico clinical trial to predict the efficacy of hip protectors for preventing hip fractures
Oliviero, S., Mattina, A. A. L., Savelli, G., & Viceconti, M. (2024) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112335 · Cited by 8
Grohganz, M., Ballell, A., Rayfield, E. J., Ferrón, H. G., Johanson, Z., & Donoghue, P. C. J. (2024) · Palaeontology · doi:10.1111/pala.12733 · Cited by 6
“Compression is mainly withstood by bone, which is stronger under compressive stress than under tension (Bayraktar et al., 2004; Beaupied et al., 2007; Keaveny et al., 1994).”
Validation of a Finite Element Human Model for Prediction of Rib Fractures
Mordaka, J., Meijer, R., van Rooij, L., et al. (2007) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/2007-01-1161 · Cited by 7
Chen, X., Myers, C. A., Clary, C. W., DeWall, R. J., Fritz, B., Blauth, M., & Rullkoetter, P. J. (2021) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110363 · Cited by 7
Altered Load Transfer in the Pelvis in the Presence of Periprosthetic Osteolysis
Munro, J. T., Fernandez, J., Millar, J., et al. (2014) · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4028522 · Cited by 7
Reliable Patient-Specific Simulations of the Femur
Yosibash, Z., & Trabelsi, N. (2011) · Studies in mechanobiology, tissue engineering and biomaterials · doi:10.1007/8415_2011_89 · Cited by 7
“Following [1, 13, 16, 2] we associated”
Huang, Y., Li, J., & Zhou, L. (2018) · Materials Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02670836.2018.1495880 · Cited by 7
“for orthopaedic applications as load bearing implants (Cortical bone compressive strength ∼100 to 200MPa, compression reduction <1% [30,31], although their physiological performance is yet to be fully assessed.”
BackgroundToussi, C. A., Ezatpour, H. R., Haddadnia, J., et al. (2018) · Materials Research Express · doi:10.1088/2053-1591/aadc55 · Cited by 7
Numerical and analytical simulation of multilayer cellular scaffolds
Khanaki, H. R., Rahmati, S., Nikkhoo, M., et al. (2020) · Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s40430-020-02335-0 · Cited by 7
Estimating tissue-level properties of porcine talar subchondral bone
Koria, L., Mengoni, M., & Brockett, C. (2020) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103931 · Cited by 7
The relationship between orthopedic clinical imaging and bone strength prediction
Gong, H., Zhang, M., Jia, S., & Lv, L. (2021) · Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices · doi:10.1016/j.medntd.2021.100060 · Cited by 8
Braesch-Andersen, A., Wu, D., Ferguson, S. J., Persson, C., & Isaksson, P. (2022) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105446 · Cited by 7
Experimental quantification of bone mechanics
Bhattacharya, P., & van Lenthe, H. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1533/9780857099037.1.30 · Cited by 7
Effect of Model Parameters on the Biomechanical Behavior of the Finite Element Cervical Spine Model
Doğru, S. C., & Arslan, Y. Z. (2021) · Applied Bionics and Biomechanics · doi:10.1155/2021/5593037 · Cited by 7
“When the model-predicted stress results from the cortical bone were considered, it was seen that all stress values remained within the specified range defined by the experiments [41].”
BackgroundResultRetractedDickinson, A., Taylor, A. C., Jeffers, J. R. T., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine · doi:10.1243/09544119jeim680 · Cited by 7
“The risk factor was calculated as the ratio of the element’s highest magnitude principal strain to a yield strain value from in-vitro data [28].”
BackgroundMethodJohnson, J. E., Brouillette, M. J., Miller, B. J., & Goetz, J. E. (2023) · Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biology · doi:10.1177/11795972231166240 · Cited by 6
Chen, X., Xu, Z., Gai, K., et al. (2025) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-025-05928-0 · Cited by 6
“When the CL is 12 mm, The maximum jawbone stress in the Ti group surpasses the cortical bone yield strength of 104 MPa reported by Bayraktar, which is considered to potentially lead to bone fatigue and thereby increase the risk of fracture [33, 36].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Bayraktar, H. H., Morgan, E. F., Niebur, G. L., Morris, G. E., Wong, E. K., & Keaveny, T. M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bayraktar, Harun H.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-35
- ISSN
- 0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089968363
- Cited by
- 1,142
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 13.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- University of California, San Francisco
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR-43784, R01AR043784, AR41481)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone fractures and treatments
- Keywords
- trabecular bone, cortical bone, femoral neck, elastic modulus, yield strain, tensile yield strength, compressive yield strength, finite element analysis
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cadaver, Computer Simulation, Elasticity, Femur Head, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Sensitivity and Specificity, Statistics as Topic, Stress, Mechanical, Tensile Strength, Reproducibility of Results, Weight-Bearing, Compressive Strength, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review