Cited by 89Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchMedicinal Plant Extracts EffectsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Chapter 5 The Endocannabinoid System as A Target for Novel Anxiolytic and Antidepressant Drugs

Gaetani, Silvana, Dipasquale, Pasqua, Romano, Adele, Righetti, Laura, Cassano, Tommaso, Piomelli, Daniele, Cuomo, Vincenzo·2009·International Review of Neurobiology

Abstract

Observational studies in humans suggest that exposure to marijuana and other cannabis-derived drugs produces a wide range of subjective effects on mood tone and emotionality. These observations have their counterpart in animal studies, showing that cannabinoid agonists strongly affect emotional reactivity in directions that vary depending on dose and context. Based on these evidence, the activation of central CB(1) receptor has emerged as potential target for the development of antianxiety and antidepressant therapies. However, the variable effects of exogenous cannabinoid agonists have gradually shifted the interest to the alternative approach of amplifying the effects of endogenous cannabinoids (EC), namely anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), by preventing their deactivation. The enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) has been the target of intense research efforts aimed at developing potent and selective inhibitors that might prolong AEA actions in vivo. Among the inhibitors developed, the compound URB597 was found to potently inhibit FAAH activity in vivo and cause brain AEA levels to increase. Interestingly, the enhanced AEA tone produced by URB597 does not result in the behavioral effects typical of a direct-acting cannabinoid agonist. Though URB597 does not elicit a full-fledged cannabinoid profile of behavioral responses, it does elicit marked anxiolytic-like and antidepressant-like effects in rats and mice. Such effects involve the downstream activation of CB(1) receptors, since they are attenuated by the CB(1) antagonist SR141716 (rimonabant). Parallel to FAAH inhibition, similar results can also be observed by pharmacologically blocking the AEA transport system, which is responsible of the intracellular uptake of AEA from the synaptic cleft. The reason why FAAH inhibition approach produces a smaller set of cannabimimetic effects might depend on the mechanism of EC synthesis and release upon neuronal activation and on the target selectivity of the drug. The mechanism of EC release is commonly referred to as "on request", since they are not synthesized and stored in synaptic vesicles, such as classical neurotransmitters, but are synthesized from membrane precursors and immediately released in the synaptic cleft following neuronal activation. The neural stimulation in specific brain areas, for example, those involved in the regulation of mood tone and/or emotional reactivity, would result in an increased EC tone in these same areas, but not necessarily in others. Therefore, inhibition of AEA metabolism activity could amplify CB(1) activation mainly where AEA release is higher. Furthermore, the inhibition of FAAH causes an accumulation of AEA but not 2-AG, which, being 200-fold more abundant than AEA in the brain, might differently modulate CB(1)-mediated behavioral responses. The evidence outlined above supports the hypothesis that the EC system plays an important role in anxiety and mood disorders and suggests that modulation of FAAH activity might be a pharmacological target for novel anxiolytic and antidepressant therapies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0074-7742(09)85005-8

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaetani, S., Dipasquale, P., Romano, A., Righetti, L., Cassano, T., Piomelli, D., & Cuomo, V.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University of Foggia (IT)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
International Review of Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2009
Volume
85
Pages
57-72
ISSN
0074-7742 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1494529338
Cited by
83
References
97
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
13.61
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International review of neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
endocannabinoid system, anxiolytics, antidepressants, CB1 receptor, anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, fatty acid amide hydrolase, FAAH inhibitors, URB597, CB1 antagonists, rimonabant, mood regulation, emotional reactivity
MeSH terms
Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolases, Amidohydrolases, Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Cannabinoids, Humans, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Drug Delivery Systems, Mice, Knockout, Mood Disorders, Mice, Drug Discovery, Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators, Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists, Cannabinoid Receptor Antagonists, Endocannabinoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review