The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural signatures of trust in reciprocity: A coordinate‐based meta‐analysis
Open accessAbstract
Trust in reciprocity (TR) is defined as the risky decision to invest valued resources in another party with the hope of mutual benefit. Several fMRI studies have investigated the neural correlates of TR in one‐shot and multiround versions of the investment game (IG). However, an overall characterization of the underlying neural networks remains elusive. Here, a coordinate‐based meta‐analysis was employed (activation likelihood estimation method, 30 articles) to investigate consistent brain activations in each of the IG stages (i.e., the trust, reciprocity and feedback stage). Results showed consistent activations in the anterior insula (AI) during trust decisions in the one‐shot IG and decisions to reciprocate in the multiround IG, likely related to representations of aversive feelings. Moreover, decisions to reciprocate also consistently engaged the intraparietal sulcus, probably involved in evaluations of the reciprocity options. On the contrary, trust decisions in the multiround IG consistently activated the ventral striatum, likely associated with reward prediction error signals. Finally, the dorsal striatum was found consistently recruited during the feedback stage of the multiround IG, likely related to reinforcement learning. In conclusion, our results indicate different neural networks underlying trust, reciprocity, and feedback learning. These findings suggest that although decisions to trust and reciprocate may elicit aversive feelings likely evoked by the uncertainty about the decision outcomes and the pressing requirements of social standards, multiple interactions allow people to build interpersonal trust for cooperation via a learning mechanism by which they arguably learn to distinguish trustworthy from untrustworthy partners. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1233–1248, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reduced trust-associated activation in the anterior insula (AI) in high-loneliness (HL) participants is consistent with prior studies identifying the AI as a key region for trust decisions during the single-round trust game.
“Our observation of reduced trust‐associated activation in the AI is consistent with recent studies highlighting the AI as a key region contributing to trust decisions specifically during the single‐round trust game.[ 29 ]”
From Loneliness and the Social Brain: How Perceived Social Isolation Impairs Human Interactions (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
The NAcc consistently responds to trust decisions during the multi-round trust game.
“The NAcc consistently responds to trust decisions during the multi‐round trust game,[ 29 ]”
From Loneliness and the Social Brain: How Perceived Social Isolation Impairs Human Interactions (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body
Craig, A. D. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn894 · Cited by 6,006
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02043 · Cited by 3,475 · cited 2×
“However, empirical studies have shown that trustors invest more than half of their initial endowment and trustees split the amount of money they received evenly [Camerer, 2003a; Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003; Johnson and Mislin, 2011].”
BackgroundInteroception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body
(Bud) Craig, A. (2003) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(03)00090-4 · Cited by 2,556
Dissociable Roles of Ventral and Dorsal Striatum in Instrumental Conditioning
O'Doherty, J., Dayan, P., Schultz, J., Deichmann, R., Friston, K., & Dolan, R. J. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1094285 · Cited by 2,088
Swift Trust and Temporary Groups
Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996) · Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research · doi:10.4135/9781452243610.n9 · Cited by 1,982 · cited 1×
“TR is defined as a risky decision to invest valued resources in another party with the hope of mutual benefit [Fehr, 2009; Knack and Keefer, 1997; Kramer, 1999; Meyerson et al., 1996; Zak and Knack, 2001].”
BackgroundThe Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment
de Quervain, D. J.-F., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., Schellhammer, M., Schnyder, U., Buck, A., & Fehr, E. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100735 · Cited by 1,768
Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04271 · Cited by 1,726 · cited 1×
“For instance, this region is more engaged in prosocial individuals when they defect, whereas pro-self individuals engage the AI more when they reciprocate [King-Casas et al., 2008; Singer et al., 2006].”
BackgroundNeural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex
Platt, M. L., & Glimcher, P. W. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/22268 · Cited by 1,721
The neurobiology of pair bonding.
Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1327 · Cited by 1,523 · cited 2×
“Additionally, this region plays a pivotal role in social behaviors like pair bonding [Aragona et al., 2006; Young and Wang, 2004] and social altruism [e.”
BackgroundReward representations and reward-related learning in the human brain: Insights from neuroimaging
O’Doherty, J. P. (2004) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2004.10.016 · Cited by 1,426
Multiple reward signals in the brain
Schultz, W. (2000) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35044563 · Cited by 1,303
Langner, R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0030694 · Cited by 746
Self-citationPerceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game
Delgado, M. R., Frank, R. H., & Phelps, E. A. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1575 · Cited by 729
Eickhoff, S. B., Nichols, T. E., Laird, A. R., Hoffstaedter, F., Amunts, K., Fox, P. T., Bzdok, D., & Eickhoff, C. R. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.072 · Cited by 683 · cited 4×
“These analyses confirmed that our results meet criteria for robust, unbiased results reflecting “true” convergence [Eickhoff et al., 2016].”
MethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationPositive reciprocity and intentions in trust games
McCabe, K. A., Rigdon, M. L., & Smith, V. L. (2003) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(03)00003-9 · Cited by 659
Aragona, B. J., Liu, Y., Yu, Y. J., Curtis, J. T., Detwiler, J. M., Insel, T. R., & Wang, Z. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1613 · Cited by 473 · cited 2×
“Additionally, this region plays a pivotal role in social behaviors like pair bonding [Aragona et al., 2006; Young and Wang, 2004] and social altruism [e.”
BackgroundActivity in human ventral striatum locked to errors of reward prediction
Pagnoni, G., Zink, C. F., Montague, P. R., & Berns, G. S. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn802 · Cited by 451
Responses to reward in monkey dorsal and ventral striatum
Apicella, P., Ljungberg, T., Scarnati, E., & Schultz, W. (1991) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00231732 · Cited by 369
Opposing BOLD responses to reciprocated and unreciprocated altruism in putative reward pathways
Rilling, J. K., Sanfey, A. G., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2004) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200411150-00022 · Cited by 281
Changing Brains, Changing Perspectives: The Neurocognitive Development of Reciprocity
van den Bos, W., van Dijk, E., Westenberg, M., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610391102 · Cited by 229
Reputation for reciprocity engages the brain reward center
Phan, K. L., Sripada, C. S., Angstadt, M., & McCabe, K. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1008137107 · Cited by 152
Intolerance of uncertainty correlates with insula activation during affective ambiguity
Simmons, A., Matthews, S. C., Paulus, M. P., & Stein, M. B. (2008) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2007.10.030 · Cited by 150 · cited 1×
“Further, activity in this region has been associated with representations of risk and uncertainty about decision outcomes [Paulus et al., 2003; Simmons et al., 2008].”
BackgroundTrust and Reciprocity in the Investment Gamewith Indirect Reward
Güth, W., Königstein, M., Marchand, N., & Nehring, K. (2000) · Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät · doi:10.18452/3431 · Cited by 50
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 105
- 10.1007/s10683-012-9314-z · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2013.2127 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn1817 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1554-07.2007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.063 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.02.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.05.006 · DOI
- 10.1006/game.1995.1027 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.004 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.98.1.294 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/cercor/bhr166 · DOI
- Camerer CF, 2003, Behavioral Game Theory ‐ Experiments in Strategic Interaction
- Camerer CF, 2003, Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction, 550
- 10.2307/1911840 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.056 · DOI · Paper page
- Chaudhuri A, 2007, An experimental analysis of trust and trustworthiness, South Econ J, 73, 959, 10.1002/j.2325-8012.2007.tb00813.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.012 · DOI
- Coleman J, 1990, Foundations of Social Theory
- 10.1038/ncomms10904 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0899-8256(03)00119-2 · DOI
- 10.1038/72131 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/cne.20749 · DOI · Paper page
- Csukás C, 2008, The determinants of trusting and reciprocal behaviour: Evidence from an intellectual experiment, J Econ Dev, 33, 71, 10.35866/caujed.2008.33.1.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01263-6 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.284.5416.970 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/02643290244000239 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.060 · DOI
- 10.1002/hbm.20718 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.017 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1602413113 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.010 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00591.x · DOI
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00728 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fnins.2012.00148 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4775-14.2015 · DOI
- 10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1162/003355399556151 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1257/jep.14.3.159 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.029 · DOI
- 10.1093/scan/nss144 · DOI
- Fouragnan E, 2013, The Neural Computation of Trust and Reputation
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3086-12.2013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/jn.90730.2008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/brain/awt076 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0033291714000737 · DOI
- Haidt J, 2003, Handbook of Affective Sciences, 852
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.023 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.035 · DOI · Paper page
- Hume D, 1998, An Enquire Concerning the Principles of Morals
- Hume D, 2000, A Treatise of Human Nature
- 10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1320189111 · DOI
- 10.1093/scan/nsq077 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1108062 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1156902 · DOI
- 10.1162/003355300555475 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0710103104 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2008.0165 · DOI
- 10.1002/hbm.21119 · DOI
- 10.1002/hbm.20129 · DOI
- 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00213 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0908855106 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5742-09.2010 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.211415698 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1100907 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0604475103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.005 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3885-14.2015 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00603-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nn896 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00251-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature05051 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0006-8993(95)00679-K · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4286-07.2008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.061 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.02.009 · DOI
- 10.2753/MIS0742-1222300404 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00755-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.conb.2008.06.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.geb.2009.05.008 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1142996 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1082976 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00014-5 · DOI
- 10.1093/scan/nss079 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832d0a67 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2011.0300 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0137014 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02091.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00848-1 · DOI
- 10.1006/nimg.2002.1131 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/hbm.21186 · DOI
- 10.1093/scan/nsp009 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0068884 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002841 · DOI
- 10.1111/1468-0297.00609 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00183-7 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yen, C., & Chiang, M.-C. (2021) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2020.1743362 · Cited by 297
Loneliness and the Social Brain: How Perceived Social Isolation Impairs Human Interactions
Lieberz, J., Shamay‐Tsoory, S. G., Saporta, N., Esser, T., Kuskova, E., Stoffel‐Wagner, B., Hurlemann, R., & Scheele, D. (2021) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202102076 · Cited by 116
The role of pupil size in communication. Is there room for learning?
Kret, M. E. (2018) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2017.1370417 · Cited by 74
Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Bellucci, G., Chernyak, S. V., Goodyear, K., Eickhoff, S. B., & Krueger, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Lübeck (DE)
- George Mason University (US)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
- Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
- Department of Psychology George Mason University Fairfax Virginia
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-11-17
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1233-1248
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC5441232
- OpenAlex
- W2550042899
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (P-57191936 to F. K.)
- the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, EI 816/4-1)
- the National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH074457)
- the Helmholtz Portfolio Theme “Supercomputing and Modelling for the Human Brain”
- the European Union Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 604102 (to S. B. E.).)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Keywords
- trust game, anterior insula, intraparietal sulcus, ventral striatum, dorsal striatum, reward prediction error, reinforcement learning, social cooperation, feedback learning
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Likelihood Functions, Databases, Bibliographic, Feedback, Psychological, Trust
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review