Cited by 11,888Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images

Jenkinson, Mark, Bannister, Peter, Brady, Michael, Smith, Stephen·2002·NeuroImage

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/nimg.2002.1132

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All data sets were corrected for head motion, eddy currents and susceptibility distortions and are, in general, of very high quality.

    “All data sets were corrected for head motion, eddy currents and susceptibility distortions and are, in general, of very high quality69–73.”
  • Participants were excluded for acute suicidality, self- or other-harming behaviour, and excessive motion in the MRI scanner.

    “Additionally, participants were excluded in the following cases: acute suicidality (one autistic participant), self- or other-harming behaviour (no participants), excessive motion in the MRI scanner (one autistic participant; defined as mean framewise displacement above 0.55 mm or maximum framewise displacement above 5 mm based on Jenkinson et al., 2002)”
  • Ground truth registration was defined by way of consistency analysis, in which multiple, independently performed registrations converged to the same result, and that result was judged sensible as assessed by a clinical expert.

    “Ground truth registration was defined by way of consistency analysis (Jenkinson et al 2002), in which multiple, independently performed registrations converged to the same result, and that result was judged sensible as assessed by a clinical expert.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., & Smith, S.
Affiliations
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Jenkinson, Mark
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-10
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
825-841
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052644075
Cited by
11,888
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 738 · 2025: 819 · 2024: 853 · 2023: 847 · 2022: 824 · 2021: 841 · 2020: 885 · 2019: 743 · 2018: 720 · 2017: 663 · 2016: 663 · 2015: 611 · 2014: 521 · 2013: 477 · 2012: 351
FWCI
44.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
linear registration, brain image registration, motion correction, optimization methods, local minima, global-local optimization, multi-resolution registration, interpolation methods, registration accuracy
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Algorithms, Brain, Computer Simulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Models, Neurological, Motion, Photic Stimulation, Reproducibility of Results, Linear Models, Fuzzy Logic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review