Cited by 578Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Eccentricity bias as an organizing principle for human high-order object areas

Open access
Hasson, Uri, Levy, Ifat, Behrmann, Marlene, Hendler, Talma, Malach, Rafael·2002·Neuron

Abstract

We have recently proposed a center-periphery organization based on resolution needs, in which objects engaging in recognition processes requiring central-vision (e.g., face-related) are associated with center-biased representations, while objects requiring large-scale feature integration (e.g., buildings) are associated with periphery-biased representations. Here we tested this hypothesis by comparing the center-periphery organization with activations to five object categories: faces, buildings, tools, letter strings, and words. We found that faces, letter strings, and words were mapped preferentially within the center-biased representation. Faces showed a hemispheric lateralization opposite to that of letter strings and words. In contrast, buildings were mapped mainly to the periphery-biased representation, while tools activated both central and peripheral representations. The results are compatible with the notion that center-periphery organization allows the optimal allocation of cortical magnification to the specific requirements of various recognition processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00662-1

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The density of neurons activated during reading probably varies continuously, though nonrandomly, across the surface of the ventral occipitotemporal cortex, thus creating a landscape of local preference for various categories of objects.

    “Rather, the density of neurons activated during reading probably varies continuously, though nonrandomly, across the surface of the ventral occipitotemporal cortex, thus creating a landscape of local preference for various categories of objects (Hasson et al., 2002; Haxby et al., 2001).”

    From Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area (2004) · cites this paper as Hasson et al., 2002

  • Hasson et al. (2002) found a site with greater responsivity to words than to either faces or buildings in the left occipitotemporal sulcus, lateral to face- and building-related activations.

    “Hasson et al. (2002) also used fMRI to contrast activations to words, houses, and faces. Again, a site with greater responsivity to words than to either faces or buildings was found in the left occipitotemporal sulcus, lateral to face- and building-related activations.”

    From Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area (2004) · cites this paper as Hasson et al. (2002)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hasson, U., Levy, I., Behrmann, M., Hendler, T., & Malach, R.
Affiliations
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Malach, Rafael
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
479-490
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126142381
Cited by
578
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 31
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KiltHub Repository
Funders
Israel Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
visual cortex, face processing, buildings, tools, letter strings, word recognition, hemispheric lateralization, cortical magnification, object recognition, feature integration
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Perception, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review