Cited by 1,546Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryHallucinations in medical conditions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A cognitive model of the positive symptoms of psychosis

Open access

Abstract

In the last 10 years a consensus has developed that the symptoms of psychosis may be better understood by linking the steps between the phenomenological experiences and social, psychological and neurobiological levels of explanation. Cognitive models of psychosis are an important link in this chain. They provide a psychological description of the phenomena from which hypotheses concerning causal processes can be derived and tested; social, individual, and neurobiological factors can then be integrated via their impact on these cognitive processes. In this paper, we set out the cognitive processes that we think lead to the formation and maintenance of the positive symptoms of psychosis and we attempt to integrate into our model research in social factors. If this model proves useful, a fuller integration with the findings of biological research will be required (Frith, 1992).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291701003312

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 46 references

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Birchwood, M. & Iqbal, Z. (1998). Depression and suicidal thinking in psychosis : a cognitive approach. In Outcome and Innovation in Psychological Treatment of Schizophrenia (ed. T. Wykes, N. Tarrier & S. Lewis), pp. 81-100. Wiley : Chichester.
  2. David, A. S. (1998). The clinical importance of insight. In Insight and Psychosis (ed. X. F. Amador and A. S. David), pp. 332-351. OUP : New York.
  3. Fowler, D., Garety, P. & Kuipers, E. (1998). Understanding the inexplicable : an individually formulated cognitive approach to delusional beliefs. In Cognitive Psychotherapy of Psychotic and Personality Disorders (ed. C. Perris and P. D. McGorry), pp. 129-146. Wiley : Chichester.
  4. Freeman, D., Garety, P., Fowler, D., Kuipers, E., Dunn, G., Bebbington, P. & Hadley, C. (1998). The London-East Anglia randomised controlled trial of cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis IV : self-esteem & persecutory delusions. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 37, 415-430.
  5. Jaspers, K. (1913). General Psychopathology (translated by J. Hoenig and M. W. Hamilton, 1959). Manchester University Press : Manchester.
  6. Kuipers, E., Fowler, D., Garety, P. A., Chisholm, D., Freeman, D., Dunn, G., Bebbington, P. E. & Hadley, C. (1998). The London- East Anglia Randomised Controlled Trial of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Psychosis III : follow-up and economic evaluation at 18 months. British Journal of Psychiatry 173, 61-68.
  7. Maher, B. A. (1988). Anomalous experience and delusional thinking : the logic of explanations. In Delusional Beliefs (ed. T. F. Oltmanns and B. A. Maher), pp. 15-33. Wiley : New York.
  8. Mueser, K. T., Goodman, L. B., Trumbetta, S. L., Rosenberg, S. D., Osher, F. C., Vidaver, R., Auciello, P. & Foy, D. W. (1998). Trauma and post traumatic stress disorder in psychosis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 66, 493-499.
  9. Peters, E. R., Joseph, S. A. & Garety, P. A. (1999). Measurement of delusional ideation in the normal population : introducing the PDI. Schizophrenia Bulletin 25, 553-576.
  10. Pharoah, F. M., Mari, J. J. & Streiner, D. (1999). Family intervention for schizophrenia (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Update Software : Oxford.
  11. Tarrier, N., Wittkowski, A., Kinney, C., McCarthy, E., Morris, J. & Humphreys, L. (1999). Durability of the effects of cognitive- behavioural therapy in the treatment of chronic schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry 174, 500-504.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,002

Metadata

Authors
GARETY, P. A., KUIPERS, E., FOWLER, D., FREEMAN, D., & BEBBINGTON, P. E.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2001-02
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
189-195
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2162176680
Cited by
1,546
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 65
FWCI
16.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
psychosis, positive symptoms, cognitive models, cognitive processes, symptom maintenance, social factors, neurobiological factors, levels of explanation, phenomenology
MeSH terms
Cognition Disorders, Humans, Psychological Theory, Psychotic Disorders, Self Concept, Social Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review