Cited by 259Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesPsychological Testing and Assessment

Sensitivity and specificity of neuropsychological tests for mild cognitive impairment, vascular cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

DE JAGER, C. A., HOGERVORST, E., COMBRINCK, M., BUDGE, M. M.·2003·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background. Early diagnosis of dementia is important for those who might benefit from treatment. We designed a brief comprehensive neuropsychological test battery to help differentiate control subjects from patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Method. The battery included tests of memory, attention, executive function, speed, perception and visuospatial skills. It was administered to subjects from the OPTIMA cohort: 51 controls, 29 with MCI, 60 with ‘possible’ or ‘probable’ Alzheimer's disease (AD) (NINCDS/ADRDA) and 12 with cerebrovascular disease (CVD). Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare performance of controls with other diagnostic groups. The sensitivity and specificity of the tests were determined using Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analyses. The effects of age, gender and years of education on test performance were determined with Spearman's rank correlations. Results. The AD group performed worse than controls on all tests except an attention task. The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test and The Placing Test for episodic memory showed significant discriminative capacity between controls and other groups. Attention and processing speed tests discriminated CVD from controls. Category fluency, episodic memory tests and the CLOX test for executive function distinguished MCI from AD. Spearman's correlations showed negative associations between age and processing speed. Years of education affected performance on all tests, except The Placing Test. Conclusions. Certain neuropsychological tests have been shown to be sensitive and specific in the differential diagnosis of various types of dementia and may prove to be useful for detection of MCI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291703008031

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DE JAGER, C. A., HOGERVORST, E., COMBRINCK, M., & BUDGE, M. M.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2003-07-31
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
1039-1050
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2053879278
Cited by
259
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, vascular cognitive impairment, dementia diagnosis, neuropsychological test battery, sensitivity and specificity, differential diagnosis, episodic memory, processing speed, executive function, attention, cerebrovascular disease, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, semantic fluency, age and education effects
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Cognition Disorders, Demography, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Dementia, Vascular, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review