Cited by 80Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and Perception

Meanings in motion and faces: Developmental associations between the processing of intention from geometrical animations and gaze detection accuracy

Open access
CAMPBELL, RUTH, LAWRENCE, KATE, MANDY, WILLIAM, MITRA, CHEYTNA, JEYAKUMA, LALITHA, SKUSE, DAVID·2006·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

Aspects of face processing, on the one hand, and theory of mind (ToM) tasks, on the other hand, show specific impairment in autism. We aimed to discover whether a correlation between tasks tapping these abilities was evident in typically developing children at two developmental stages. One hundred fifty-four normal children (6-8 years and 16-18 years) and 13 high-IQ autistic children (11-17 years) were tested on a range of face-processing and IQ tasks, and a ToM test based on the attribution of intentional movement to abstract shapes in a cartoon. By midchildhood, the ability accurately and spontaneously to infer the locus of attention of a face with direct or averted gaze was specifically associated with the ability to describe geometrical animations using mental state terms. Other face-processing and animation descriptions failed to show the association. Autistic adolescents were impaired at both gaze processing and ToM descriptions, using these tests. Mentalizing and gaze perception accuracy are associated in typically developing children and adolescents. The findings are congruent with the possibility that common neural circuitry underlies, at least in part, processing implicated in these tasks. They are also congruent with the possibility that autism may lie at one end of a developmental continuum with respect to these skills, and to the factor(s) underpinning them.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579406060068

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Campbell et al.'s (2006) results suggest that eye gaze acuity may be slightly worse in children with ASD.

    “Even so, Campbell et al.'s (2006) results do suggest that eye gaze acuity may be slightly worse in children with ASD.”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Campbell et al. (2006)

  • Campbell et al. (2006) found a specific deficit in eye gaze sensitivity in their sample of 11-year-old children with ASD and carefully matched controls.

    “Campbell et al. (2006), however, did find a specific deficit in eye gaze sensitivity in their sample of 11-year-old children with ASD and carefully matched controls.”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Campbell et al. (2006)

  • Campbell et al.'s (2006) task was likely more challenging than Leekam et al.'s (1997) in that the gaze displacements were smaller.

    “Their task was likely more challenging than that of Leekam et al. (1997) in that the gaze displacements were smaller.”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Campbell et al. (2006)

  • Two studies have suggested that younger children with ASD may have problems with detecting very fine modulations of eye gaze.

    “Two studies have suggested that younger children with ASD may have problems with detecting very fine modulations of eye gaze (Campbell et al., 2006;Webster & Potter, 2008)”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Campbell et al. (2006)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Baron-Cohen, S. ~1995!. Mind-blindness: An essay on the psychology of autism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  2. Elgar, K., & Campbell, R. ~2001!. Face recognition dis- orders in developmental neuroscience. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 707-725.
  3. Hobson, R. P. ~1991!. Methodological issues for experi- ments on autistic individual's perception and under- standing of emotion. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 1135-1158.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CAMPBELL, R., LAWRENCE, K., MANDY, W., MITRA, C., JEYAKUMA, L., & SKUSE, D.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Institute of Child Health
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2006-02-10
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
99-118
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2142667364
Cited by
80
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (RES-620-28-6001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, theory of mind, gaze perception, face processing, mentalization, intention attribution, mental state language, developmental continuity, adolescents
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Face, Facial Expression, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Social Behavior, Prosopagnosia, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review