Cited by 203Treatment of Major DepressionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchTryptophan and brain disorders

Reduced level of glutamic acid decarboxylase-67 kDa in the prefrontal cortex in major depression

Open access
Karolewicz, Beata, Maciag, Dorota, O'Dwyer, Gillian, Stockmeier, Craig A., Feyissa, Anteneh M., Rajkowska, Grazyna·2010·The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests dysfunction of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) system in major depressive disorder (MDD). Neuroimaging studies consistently report reductions of cortical GABA in depressed patients. Our post-mortem analyses demonstrate a reduction in the density and size of GABAergic interneurons in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in MDD. The goal of this study was to test whether the level of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), the GABA synthesizing enzyme, will also be reduced in the same cortical region in MDD. Levels of GAD-65 and GAD-67 proteins were investigated by Western blotting in samples from the DLPFC (BA 9) in 13 medication-free subjects with MDD, and 13 psychiatrically healthy controls. The overall amount of GAD-67 was significantly reduced (-34%) in depressed subjects compared to matched controls. Since recent neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that antidepressants modulate GABA levels, additional experiments were performed to examine the levels of GAD in eight depressed subjects treated with antidepressant medications. Levels of GAD-67 were unchanged in these depressed subjects compared to their respective controls (n=8). The overall amounts of GAD-65 were similar in depressed subjects compared to matched controls, regardless of antidepressant medication. Reduced levels of GAD-67, which is localized to somata of GABA neurons, further support our observation of a decreased density of GABAergic neurons in the PFC in depression. It is likely that a decrease in GAD-67 accounts for the reduction in GABA levels revealed by neuroimaging studies. Moreover, our data support previous neuroimaging observations that antidepressant medication normalizes GABA deficits in depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1461145709990587

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decreased cortical levels of GABA and specific populations of GABA neurons have been reported in postmortem MDD patient tissues.

    “Decreased cortical levels of GABA and specific populations of GABA neurons have been reported in investigations of postmortem MDD patient tissues, 440”

    From Major depressive disorder: hypothesis, mechanism, prevention and treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [440]

    The Introduction reports reduced density and size of calbindin-positive GABAergic interneurons in postmortem MDD prefrontal cortex. But the paper's own postmortem measurement was of GAD-67 protein, not GABA levels; the cortical GABA reductions it reports came from neuroimaging studies of living patients (Discussion). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karolewicz, B., Maciag, D., O'Dwyer, G., Stockmeier, C. A., Feyissa, A. M., & Rajkowska, G.
Affiliations
University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Karolewicz, Beata
Venue
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2009-09-15
Volume
13
Issue
04
Pages
411
ISSN
  • 1461-1457 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5111
OpenAlex
W2047432718
Cited by
203
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • National Institutes of Health (5p20rr017701-10)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH067996, MH67996, MH60451, P50MH060451)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P20-RR-017701, RR017701)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
major depressive disorder, glutamic acid decarboxylase 67, GABAergic interneurons, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, antidepressants, postmortem brain, GABA synthesis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Glutamate Decarboxylase, Humans, Isoenzymes, Male, Middle Aged, Case-Control Studies, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review