The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integration of Cell Culture and Microfabrication Technology
Abstract
Recent progress in cell culture and microfabrication technologies has contributed to the development of cell‐based biosensors for the functional characterization and detection of drugs, pathogens, toxicants, and odorants. The cell‐based biosensors are composed of two transducers, where the primary transducer is cellular and the secondary transducer is typically electrical. Advances in gene manipulation and cell culture techniques have contributed to the development of the cell as a transducer, while microfabrication techniques have been applied to the development of integrating the cell with the second transducer. Cellular patterning using microfabrication techniques is essential for cell‐based biosensors, cell culture analogues, tissue engineering, and fundamental studies of cell biology. The photolithographic technique is highly developed and has been widely used for patterning cells. Recently, a set of alternative techniques, largely based on soft lithoghraphy, has been developed for biological applications. Those techniques include microcontact printing, microfluidic patterning using microchannels, and laminar flow patterning. A classical metallic stencil patterning method has been improved by employing a rubber‐like stencil. These cellular micropatterning techniques have been usefully employed to understand questions in fundamental cell biology, especially cellular interactions with various materials and other cells. Using these micropatterning tecchniques and insights into the interaction of cellular biology with surfaces, a wide array of biosensors have been developed. In this manuscript examples of cell‐based biosensors are described. Neurons have a great potential for use in a cell‐based biosensor because they are electrically excitable cells, from which electrical signals are generated with the binding of detecting molecules. Consequently, the electrical signals generated in the cell can be determined in a noninvasive manner. A microphysiometer is a device to detect functional responses from cells by measuring the change of extracellular pH. The main application of the microphysiometer is the analysis of functional responses of cells upon receptor stimulation. Development of a microscale cell culture analogue system, an in vitro animal or human surrogate, is another promising area using cell culture and microfabrication technologies. Such devices are potentially very useful in the fields of toxicology and drug testing because they may increase the accuracy of in vitro predictions, simplify testing procedures, and reduce the cost of such tests, allowing many more tests to be done with a limited set of resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Geometric Control of Cell Life and Death
Chen, C. S., Mrksich, M., Huang, S., Whitesides, G. M., & Ingber, D. E. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5317.1425 · Cited by 4,657
Xia, Y., & Whitesides, G. M. (1998) · Annual Review of Materials Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.28.1.153 · Cited by 4,611
Tissue Engineering--Current Challenges and Expanding Opportunities
Griffith, L. G., & Naughton, G. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069210 · Cited by 2,343
Kumar, A., & Whitesides, G. M. (1993) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.110628 · Cited by 1,605
Patterning proteins and cells using soft lithography
Kane, R. (1999) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00165-9 · Cited by 1,490
Engineering cell shape and function
Singhvi, R., Kumar, A., Lopez, G. P., Stephanopoulos, G. N., Wang, D. I. C., Whitesides, G. M., & Ingber, D. E. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8171320 · Cited by 1,453
Sublines of mouse 3T3 cells that accumulate lipid
Green, H., & Kehinde, O. (1974) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(74)90126-3 · Cited by 918
Polymer microstructures formed by moulding in capillaries
Kim, E., Xia, Y., & Whitesides, G. M. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/376581a0 · Cited by 878
Spontaneous heritable changes leading to increased adipose conversion in 3T3 cells
Green, H., & Kehinde, O. (1976) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(76)90260-9 · Cited by 827
Light-Addressable Potentiometric Sensor for Biochemical Systems
Hafeman, D. G., Parce, J. W., & McConnell, H. M. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3375810 · Cited by 709
Cited by
Nanomedicine—Challenge and Perspectives
Riehemann, K., Schneider, S. W., Luger, T. A., Godin, B., Ferrari, M., & Fuchs, H. (2009) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200802585 · Cited by 1,305
A microfluidic culture platform for CNS axonal injury, regeneration and transport
Taylor, A. M., Blurton-Jones, M., Rhee, S. W., Cribbs, D. H., Cotman, C. W., & Jeon, N. L. (2005) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth777 · Cited by 1,153
Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices
Halldorsson, S., Lucumi, E., Gómez-Sjöberg, R., & Fleming, R. M. T. (2015) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2014.07.029 · Cited by 1,027
Revealing neuronal function through microelectrode array recordings
Obien, M. E. J., Deligkaris, K., Bullmann, T., Bakkum, D. J., & Frey, U. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00423 · Cited by 705
Organs-on-a-Chip: A Fast Track for Engineered Human Tissues in Drug Development
Ronaldson-Bouchard, K., & Vunjak-Novakovic, G. (2018) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2018.02.011 · Cited by 657
Engineering microscale topographies to control the cell–substrate interface
Nikkhah, M., Edalat, F., Manoucheri, S., & Khademhosseini, A. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.079 · Cited by 640
Chang, R., Nam, J., & Sun, W. (2008) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.a.2007.0004 · Cited by 549
Continuous perfusion microfluidic cell culture array for high‐throughput cell‐based assays
Hung, P. J., Lee, P. J., Sabounchi, P., Lin, R., & Lee, L. P. (2005) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.20289 · Cited by 522
Microfluidics technology for manipulation and analysis of biological cells
Yi, C., Li, C.-W., Ji, S., & Yang, M. (2006) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2005.12.037 · Cited by 478
Microfluidic cell culture systems for drug research
Wu, M.-H., Huang, S.-B., & Lee, G.-B. (2010) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b921695b · Cited by 432
Hydrogel Based Sensors for Biomedical Applications: An Updated Review
Tavakoli, J., & Tang, Y. (2017) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym9080364 · Cited by 434
Sung, J. H., & Shuler, M. L. (2009) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b901377f · Cited by 431
Self-citationMicroenvironment design considerations for cellular scale studies
Walker, G. M., Zeringue, H. C., & Beebe, D. J. (2004) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b311214d · Cited by 388
Differentiation-on-a-chip: A microfluidic platform for long-term cell culture studies
Tourovskaia, A., Figueroa-Masot, X., & Folch, A. (2005) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b405719h · Cited by 363
Microfluidics for medical diagnostics and biosensors
Rivet, C., Lee, H., Hirsch, A., Hamilton, S., & Lu, H. (2011) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2010.08.015 · Cited by 356
Zhang, C., Zhao, Z., Abdul Rahim, N. A., van Noort, D., & Yu, H. (2009) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b915147h · Cited by 340
Vickerman, V., Blundo, J., Chung, S., & Kamm, R. (2008) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b802395f · Cited by 340
Organ-on-a chip systems: microengineering to biomimic living systems
Zheng, F., Fu, F., Cheng, Y., Wang, C., Zhao, Y., & Gu, Z. (2016) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201503208 · Cited by 338
Xu, F., Celli, J., Rizvi, I., Moon, S., Hasan, T., & Demirci, U. (2011) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201000340 · Cited by 337
Vascularized Bone Tissue Engineering: Approaches for Potential Improvement
Nguyen, L. H., Annabi, N., Nikkhah, M., Bae, H., Binan, L., Park, S., Kang, Y., Yang, Y., & Khademhosseini, A. (2012) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0012 · Cited by 313
Microfluidic approaches for cancer cell detection, characterization, and separation
Chen, J., Li, J., & Sun, Y. (2012) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc21273k · Cited by 301
Marx, U. (2016) · ALTEX · doi:10.14573/altex.1603161 · Cited by 295
Recent advances in microcontact printing
Quist, A. P., Pavlovic, E., & Oscarsson, S. (2005) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-004-2847-z · Cited by 292
Ishizaki, T., Saito, N., & Takai, O. (2010) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la904447c · Cited by 279
Microfluidics for cell-based high throughput screening platforms—A review
Du, G., Fang, Q., & den Toonder, J. M. J. (2016) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.023 · Cited by 276
Hung, P. J., Lee, P. J., Sabounchi, P., Aghdam, N., Lin, R., & Lee, L. P. (2005) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b410743h · Cited by 259
A multicellular spheroid array to realize spheroid formation, culture, and viability assay on a chip
Torisawa, Y.-S., Takagi, A., Nashimoto, Y., Yasukawa, T., Shiku, H., & Matsue, T. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.054 · Cited by 176
Torisawa, Y.-S., Shiku, H., Yasukawa, T., Nishizawa, M., & Matsue, T. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.028 · Cited by 124
Cells Cultured on Core–Shell Photonic Crystal Barcodes for Drug Screening
Fu, F., Shang, L., Zheng, F., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Wang, J., Gu, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2016) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.6b04966 · Cited by 118
Banerjee, P., Lenz, D., Robinson, J. P., Rickus, J. L., & Bhunia, A. K. (2008) · Laboratory Investigation · doi:10.1038/labinvest.3700703 · Cited by 97
Ma, L., Barker, J., Zhou, C., Li, W., Zhang, J., Lin, B., Foltz, G., Küblbeck, J., & Honkakoski, P. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.054 · Cited by 83
Organ-Tumor-on-a-Chip for Chemosensitivity Assay: A Critical Review
Kashaninejad, N., Nikmaneshi, M., Moghadas, H., Kiyoumarsi Oskouei, A., Rismanian, M., Barisam, M., Saidi, M., & Firoozabadi, B. (2016) · Micromachines · doi:10.3390/mi7080130 · Cited by 79
Chien, H.-W., & Tsai, W.-B. (2012) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.033 · Cited by 70
Bridging the gap: microfluidic devices for short and long distance cell–cell communication
Vu, T. Q., de Castro, R. M. B., & Qin, L. (2017) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c6lc01367h · Cited by 63
The future of skin toxicology testing–three-dimensional bioprinting meets microfluidics
Ng, W. L., & Yeong, W. Y. (2019) · International Journal of Bioprinting · doi:10.18063/ijb.v5i2.1.237 · Cited by 48
Advances in cell‐based biosensors using three‐dimensional cell‐encapsulating hydrogels
Zhou, L., Huang, G., Wang, S., Wu, J., Lee, W. G., Chen, Y., Xu, F., & Lu, T. (2011) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201100098 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, T. H., & Shuler, M. L.
- Venue
- Biotechnology Progress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 243-253
- ISSN
- 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-7938
- OpenAlex
- W2150739149
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 8.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
