Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 528

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 at Copper Nanofoams

Sen, Sujat, Liu, Dan, Palmore, G. Tayhas R.·2014·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

We report the electrochemical reduction of CO 2 at copper foams with hierarchical porosity. We show that both the distribution of products formed from this reaction and their faradaic efficiencies differ significantly from those obtained at smooth electropolished copper electrodes. We attribute these differences to be due to high surface roughness, hierarchical porosity, and confinement of reactive species. We provide preliminary evidence in support of these claims.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cs500522g

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sen, S., Liu, D., & Palmore, G. T. R.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2014-08-08
Volume
4
Issue
9
Pages
3091-3095
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4244040320
Cited by
528
References
26
FWCI
16.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.