Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative Evaluation of Thermochemical Liquefaction and Pyrolysis for Bio-Oil Production from Microalgae

Jena, Umakanta, Das, K. C.·2011·Energy & Fuels

Abstract

Bio-oil is the liquid product of thermochemical liquefaction or pyrolysis of biomass. Thermochemical liquefaction (TCL) is a low temperature (250–350 °C) and high pressure (5–20 MPa) process particularly suited for high moisture feedstocks, whereas pyrolysis is accomplished at moderate to high temperatures (400–600 °C) and atmospheric pressure and requires drying of the feedstock. In this paper, we present experimental results that provide a critical comparison of TCL and slow pyrolysis processes for producing bio-oil from algae. TCL experiments were performed in a 1.8-L Parr reactor using algae slurry (80% moisture) and pyrolysis runs were carried out in an 8-L mild steel cubical reactor, using dried algal powder as received (∼4% moisture). Yields and composition of bio-oil, char, gases, and aqueous phase were evaluated and compared for TCL and pyrolysis. TCL resulted in higher bio-oil yields (∼41%), lower char yields (∼6.3%), and lower energy consumption ratio compared to pyrolysis, which resulted in 23–29% bio-oil, and 28–40% solids yields. Bio-oil obtained from TCL was found to have higher energy density and superior fuel properties such as thermal and storage stabilities, compared to pyrolysis bio-oil.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ef201373m

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Jena, U., & Das, K. C.
Venue
Energy & Fuels
Published
2011-11-07
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
5472-5482
ISSN
  • 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5029
OpenAlex
W2054842918
Cited by
405
References
26
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.