Cited by 299Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

Detection of perfluorooctane surfactants in Great Lakes water

Boulanger, Bryan, Vargo, John, Schnoor, Jerald L., Hornbuckle, Keri C.·2004·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Widespread use of perfluorooctane surfactants has led to ubiquitous presence of these chemicals in biological tissues. While perfluorooctane surfactants have been measured in blood and liver tissue samples of fish, birds, and mammals in the Great Lakes region, data for the aqueous concentrations of these compounds in the Great Lakes or other ambient waters is lacking. Sixteen Great Lakes water samples were analyzed for eight perfluorooctane surfactants. The monitored perfluorooctane surfactants were quantitatively determined using single quadrupole HPLC/MS and qualitatively confirmed using ion trap MS/MS. Additionally, PFOS was quantitatively confirmed using triple quadrupole LC/MS/MS. Concentrations of PFOS and PFOA in the two lakes ranged from 21-70 and 27-50 ng/L, respectively. Analysis also showed the presence of PFOS precursors, N-EtFOSAA (range of 4.2-11 ng/L) and FOSA (range of 0.6-1.3 ng/L), in all samples above the LOQ. PFOSulfinate, another precursor, was identified at six of eight locations with a concentration range, when present, of <2.2-17 ng/L. Other PFOS precursors, N-EtFOSE, PFOSAA, and N-EtFOSA were not observed at any of the sampling locations. These are the first reported concentrations of perfluorooctane surfactants in Great Lakes water and the first report of PFOS precursors in any water body.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es0496975

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boulanger, B., Vargo, J., Schnoor, J. L., & Hornbuckle, K. C.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Hornbuckle, Keri C.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2004-06-22
Volume
38
Issue
15
Pages
4064-4070
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W1964923030
Cited by
299
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
15.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Iowa Research Online (University of Iowa) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Center for Global and Regional Environmental Research, University of Iowa
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30-ES-05605, P30ES005605)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorinated compounds, environmental contamination, fosA
MeSH terms
Animals, Caprylates, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Fishes, Fluorocarbons, Fresh Water, Great Lakes Region, Mass Spectrometry, Surface-Active Agents, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review