Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 11,989

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved Synthesis of Graphene Oxide

Marcano, Daniela C., Kosynkin, Dmitry V., Berlin, Jacob M., Sinitskii, Alexander, Sun, Zhengzong, Slesarev, Alexander, Alemany, Lawrence B., Lu, Wei, Tour, James M.·2010·ACS Nano

Abstract

An improved method for the preparation of graphene oxide (GO) is described. Currently, Hummers' method (KMnO(4), NaNO(3), H(2)SO(4)) is the most common method used for preparing graphene oxide. We have found that excluding the NaNO(3), increasing the amount of KMnO(4), and performing the reaction in a 9:1 mixture of H(2)SO(4)/H(3)PO(4) improves the efficiency of the oxidation process. This improved method provides a greater amount of hydrophilic oxidized graphene material as compared to Hummers' method or Hummers' method with additional KMnO(4). Moreover, even though the GO produced by our method is more oxidized than that prepared by Hummers' method, when both are reduced in the same chamber with hydrazine, chemically converted graphene (CCG) produced from this new method is equivalent in its electrical conductivity. In contrast to Hummers' method, the new method does not generate toxic gas and the temperature is easily controlled. This improved synthesis of GO may be important for large-scale production of GO as well as the construction of devices composed of the subsequent CCG.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nn1006368

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Chakraborty S., 2008, Chem. Mater., 20, 3134, 10.1021/cm800060q · doi:10.1021/cm800060q
  2. Uhl F., 2004, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 84, 215, 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2003.10.014 · DOI
  3. Brodie B. C., 1859, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, 14, 249
  4. Maire J., 1968, Carbon, 6, 555, 10.1016/0008-6223(68)90095-X · doi:10.1016/0008-6223(68)90095-x
  5. Touzain, P.; Yazumi, R.; Maire, J.Insertion Compounds of Graphite with Improved Performances and Electrochemical Applications of those Compounds. U.S. Patent 4584252, April 22, 1986. · doi:10.1016/0008-6223(87)90067-4
  6. Aoi Y., 1999, J. Appl. Phys., 86, 2318, 10.1063/1.371048 · doi:10.1063/1.371048
  7. Sinitskii A., ACS Nano

Cited by

Items 101–169 of 169

Metadata

Authors
Marcano, D. C., Kosynkin, D. V., Berlin, J. M., Sinitskii, A., Sun, Z., Slesarev, A., Alemany, L. B., Lu, W., & Tour, J. M.
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2010-07-22
Volume
4
Issue
8
Pages
4806-4814
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W2140746165
Cited by
11,989
References
41
FWCI
89.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.