Cited by 317Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Defining the Brain Systems of Lust, Romantic Attraction, and Attachment

Fisher, Helen E., Aron, Arthur, Mashek, Debra, Li, Haifang, Brown, Lucy L.·2002·Archives of Sexual Behavior

Abstract

Mammals and birds have evolved three primary, discrete, interrelated emotion-motivation systems in the brain for mating, reproduction, and parenting: lust, attraction, and male-female attachment. Each emotion-motivation system is associated with a specific constellation of neural correlates and a distinct behavioral repertoire. Lust evolved to initiate the mating process with any appropriate partner; attraction evolved to enable individuals to choose among and prefer specific mating partners, thereby conserving their mating time and energy; male-female attachment evolved to enable individuals to cooperate with a reproductive mate until species-specific parental duties have been completed. The evolution of these three emotion-motivation systems contribute to contemporary patterns of marriage, adultery, divorce, remarriage, stalking, homicide and other crimes of passion, and clinical depression due to romantic rejection. This article defines these three emotion-motivation systems. Then it discusses an ongoing project using functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain to investigate the neural circuits associated with one of these emotion-motivation systems, romantic attraction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1019888024255

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fisher, H. E., Aron, A., Mashek, D., Li, H., & Brown, L. L.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • State University of New York (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Fisher, Helen E.
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Published
2002-10
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
413-419
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
OpenAlex
W2129018677
Cited by
317
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 17
FWCI
9.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
lust, romantic attraction, attachment, mating behavior, parental behavior, neural circuits, brain evolution, passion crime, romantic rejection, depression, functional MRI
MeSH terms
Affect, Brain, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Libido, Love, Male, Object Attachment, Receptors, Adrenergic, Receptors, Dopamine, Receptors, Serotonin, Sexual Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review