Cited by 818Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measurement of dissociative states with the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS).

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument for the measurement of present‐state dissociative symptoms, the Clinician Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS). Reported here are interrater reliability and internal consistency of the CADSS, validity as assessed by comparisons with other instruments for the assessment of dissociation, and sensitivity of the CADSS to discriminate patients with dissociative disorders from patients with other psychiatric disorders and healthy subjects. Initial analyses indicated good interrater reliability and construct validity for the CADSS. Scores on the CADSS discriminated patients with dissociative disorders from the other groups.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1024465317902

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bliss E., 1986, Multiple personalities, allied disorders, and hypnotizability
  2. Branscombe L. P., 1991, Dissociation in combat‐related posttraumatic stress disorder, Dissociation, 4, 13
  3. 10.1002/jts.2490100105 · DOI
  4. Loewenstein R., 1988, A comparison study of dissociative symptoms in patients with complex partial seizures, MPD, and PTSD, Dissociation, 1, 17
  5. Spitzer R. L., 1987, Structured clinical interview for DSMIIIR
  6. van der Kolk B. A., 1987, Psychological trauma

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 818

Metadata

Authors
Bremner, J. D., Krystal, J. H., Putnam, F. W., Southwick, S. M., Marmar, C., Charney, D. S., & Mazure, C. M.
Affiliations
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Bremner, J. Douglas
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
125-136
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W2097857685
Cited by
817
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 33
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
dissociative states, dissociation assessment, dissociative disorders, inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, discriminant validity, mental illness
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Combat Disorders, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, United States, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review