Cited by 1,942Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesRemote Sensing in AgricultureAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000

Open access
Ramankutty, Navin, Evan, Amato T., Monfreda, Chad, Foley, Jonathan A.·2008·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

Agricultural activities have dramatically altered our planet's land surface. To understand the extent and spatial distribution of these changes, we have developed a new global data set of croplands and pastures circa 2000 by combining agricultural inventory data and satellite‐derived land cover data. The agricultural inventory data, with much greater spatial detail than previously available, is used to train a land cover classification data set obtained by merging two different satellite‐derived products (Boston University's MODIS‐derived land cover product and the GLC2000 data set). Our data are presented at 5 min (∼10 km) spatial resolution in longitude by longitude, have greater accuracy than previously available, and for the first time include statistical confidence intervals on the estimates. According to the data, there were 15.0 (90% confidence range of 12.2–17.1) million km 2 of cropland (12% of the Earth's ice‐free land surface) and 28.0 (90% confidence range of 23.6–30.0) million km 2 of pasture (22%) in the year 2000.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2007gb002952

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 68 references

2 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Central Bureau of Statistics, 2001, Statistical Year Book of Nepal 2001
  2. Crook F., 1993, China International Agriculture and Trade Report, 33
  3. Forestry Management, Evaluation and Coordinating Unit (FORMECU), 1995, An Assessment of Land Use and Vegetation Changes in Nigeria Between 1978–1993
  4. 10.1034/j.1600-0889.2003.01450.x · DOI
  5. Latham J., 2001, AFRICOVER eastern Africa, LUCC Newsl, 7, 15
  6. Lopez‐Meisel D., 1996, 1991 Census of Agriculture of the Philippines
  7. 10.1175/1520-0442-16.10.1511 · DOI
  8. National Statistical Office of Mongolia, 2004, Mongolia in a Market System Statistical Yearbook: 1989–2002
  9. State Committee of the Russian Federation on Statistics, 1995, Sel'skoe khoziaistvo Rossii: Statisticheskii sbornik

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,002

Metadata

Authors
Ramankutty, N., Evan, A. T., Monfreda, C., & Foley, J. A.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
2008-01-17
Volume
22
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9224
OpenAlex
W1838764073
Cited by
1,942
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 142 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 119 · 2021: 173 · 2020: 149 · 2019: 141 · 2018: 142 · 2017: 119 · 2016: 145 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 104 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 88
FWCI
55.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Global Biogeochemical Cycles (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Wageningen University and Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
cropland extent, land cover classification, MODIS land cover, GLC2000, land surface change, confidence intervals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review