Cited by 218Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumInfant Development and Preterm CarePrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Maternal stress and affect influence fetal neurobehavioral development

DiPietro, Janet A., Hilton, Sterling C., Hawkins, Melissa, Costigan, Kathleen A., Pressman, Eva K.·2002·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

The authors investigated the association between maternal psychological and fetal neurobehavioral functioning. Data were provided by 52 maternal-fetal pairs at 24, 30, and 36 weeks gestation. The relations between maternal measures and fetal heart rate, variability, and motor activity were statistically modeled. Fetuses of women who were more affectively intense, appraised their lives as more stressful, and reported more frequent pregnancy-specific hassles were more active across gestation. Fetuses of women who perceived their pregnancy to be more intensely and frequently uplifting and had positive emotional valence toward pregnancy were less active. Associations with fetal heart-rate measures were detected at 36 weeks gestation. These data provide evidence for proximal effects of maternal psychological functioning on fetal neurobehavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.659

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pregnancy-specific stress measures predict developmental outcomes better than general psychological distress measures.

    “Further evidence suggests that measures of pregnancy specific stress are better than measures of generalized psychological distress for predicting developmental outcomes including, fetal behavior (DiPietro et al., 2002), infant cognitive and motor development (Huizink et al., 2003; Dipietro et al., 2006; Davis & Sandman, in press) and infant emotional regulation (Dipietro et al., 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DiPietro, J. A., Hilton, S. C., Hawkins, M., Costigan, K. A., & Pressman, E. K.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Brigham Young University (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2002
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
659-668
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2116890385
Cited by
218
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD 27592, R01HD027592)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
maternal stress, maternal affect, fetal heart rate, fetal heart rate variability, fetal movement, prenatal stress, maternal-fetal interaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Educational Status, Female, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Fetal Movement, Gestational Age, Heart Rate, Fetal, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Maternal Age, Nervous System, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Psychological Tests, Stress, Physiological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review