Cited by 1,381Health disparities and outcomesResilience and Mental HealthPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resource loss, resource gain, and emotional outcomes among inner city women.

Hobfoll, Stevan E., Johnson, Robert J., Ennis, Nicole, Jackson, Anita P.·2003·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The authors examined a dynamic conceptualization of stress by investigating how economic stress, measured in terms of material loss, alters women's personal and social resources and how these changed resources impact anger and depressive mood. Resource change in women's mastery and social support over 9 months was significantly associated with changes in depressive mood and anger among 714 inner city women. Greater loss of mastery and social support was associated with increased depressive mood and anger. Loss of mastery and social support also mediated the impact of material loss on depressive mood and anger. Resource loss and worsening economic circumstances had more negative impact than resource gain and improving economic circumstances had positive impact, suggesting the greater saliency of loss than gain.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.632

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.131 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.59.3.525 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.283 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/0893-3200.16.1.26 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0022-006X.63.3.445 · DOI
  7. 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.620 · DOI
  8. Joreskog, 1994, LISREL 8.12a
  9. 10.1037/0021-843X.108.1.164 · DOI
  10. 10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.839 · DOI
  11. 10.1037/0022-006X.60.6.935 · DOI
  12. 10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.899 · DOI
  13. 10.1037/0882-7974.13.3.396 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Hobfoll, S. E., Johnson, R. J., Ennis, N., & Jackson, A. P.
Affiliations
Kent State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2003
Volume
84
Issue
3
Pages
632-643
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W1997682147
Cited by
1,381
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 105 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 49
FWCI
13.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
financial stress, material loss, resource loss, resource gain, mastery, social support, depressive mood, anger, inner-city women, emotional outcomes, mediation, economic conditions
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Anger, Depression, Female, Humans, Income, Internal-External Control, Models, Psychological, Poverty, Prospective Studies, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, United States, Women, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review