The DOI matches its Crossref record; 195 of the 195 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987.
Abstract
L'auteur analyse les effets de variables methodologiques (type et complexite du stimulus, intervalle de presentation, temps d'exposition) et de variables subjectives (âge d'exposition, personnalite) sur la sensibilite du sujet aux stimulus de toutes sortes. Il conclut sur l'interet methodologique de sa recherche, ainsi que sur ses apports pratiques (publicite, traitement de la phobie)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In general, individuals prefer the familiar to the unknown because more risks are involved about the unknown [49,50].”
From Consumer Responses to Generative AI Chatbots Versus Search Engines for Product Evaluation (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“Research in psychology has shown that repeated exposure to a stimulus increases preference for it even when listeners are unaware of the repetition (Zajonc 1968;Bornstein 1989)”
From The Algorithmic Flattening of Sound: Computational Evidence and Justice Implications of AI Music Homogenization (2026) · cites this paper as Bornstein 1989
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure
Zajonc, R. B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025848 · Cited by 6,745
Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms
Hollander, E. P., & Homans, G. C. (1963) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419191 · Cited by 4,708
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
The associative basis of the creative process.
Mednick, S. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0048850 · Cited by 4,140
A personality scale of manifest anxiety
Taylor, J. A. (1953) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0056264 · Cited by 3,131
The Teacher's Word Book of 30, 000 Words
Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. D. (2018) · Cited by 2,656
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,001
Winkielman, P., & Berridge, K. C. (2003) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1046/j.1467-9221.2003.00346.x · Cited by 66
Interior Color and Psychological Functioning in a University Residence Hall
Costa, M., Frumento, S., Nese, M., & Predieri, I. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01580 · Cited by 67
“A mere exposure effect (Bornstein, 1989), due to the familiarity with the actual color, could have contributed to increase its pleasantness.”
BackgroundSelf-Anchoring in Conversation: Why Language Users Do Not Do What They “Should”
Keysar, B., & Barr, D. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.010 · Cited by 67
Pungency in food perception and preference
Prescott, J., & Stevenson, R. J. (1995) · Food Reviews International · doi:10.1080/87559129509541064 · Cited by 66
Subjective value determines initial dominance in binocular rivalry
Balcetis, E., Dunning, D., & Granot, Y. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.009 · Cited by 70
Basch, J. M., & Melchers, K. G. (2019) · Personnel Assessment and Decisions · doi:10.25035/pad.2019.03.002 · Cited by 75
“Given that it is long known that greater familiarity leads to more positive evaluations of an object (Bornstein, 1989), it is conceivable that interviewees who actually complete a video interview would evaluate it more positively than the present participants. Nevertheless, on the basis of evidence by Truxillo et al.…”
BackgroundManaging performance and winning trust: how World Bank staff shape recipient performance
Heinzel, M., & Liese, A. (2021) · The Review of International Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11558-021-09414-4 · Cited by 66
“This insight is built on findings in social psychology and organizational studies that indicate that more prolonged exposure to individuals increases trust, ceteris paribus (Bornstein 1989; Kwan et al. 2015).”
BackgroundFalse fame prevented: Avoiding fluency effects without judgmental correction.
Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019260 · Cited by 68
From Inherent Value to Incentive Value: When and Why Pointless Effort Enhances Consumer Preference
Kim, S., & Labroo, A. A. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/660806 · Cited by 67
Meaning in Context: Metacognitive Experiences
Schwarz, N. (2010) · Cited by 65
Durability Bias in Affective Forecasting
Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.018 · Cited by 66
The sensorimotor contributions to implicit memory, familiarity, and recollection.
Topolinski, S. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0025658 · Cited by 65
Food Perception and Aesthetics - Linking Sensory Science to Culinary Practice
Schifferstein, H. N. J., Kudrowitz, B. M., & Breuer, C. (2020) · Journal of Culinary Science & Technology · doi:10.1080/15428052.2020.1824833 · Cited by 74
“The third method is simply repeated exposure over time (Bornstein, 1989) as mentioned earlier when discussing bitter and spicy foods.”
MethodPerson‐environment misfit: the neglected role of social context
Cooper-Thomas, H. D., & Wright, S. (2013) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683941311298841 · Cited by 65
“There is ample evidence of the link between familiarity and liking, which can occur without conscious recognition of such familiarity – known as the “mere exposure effect” (Bornstein, 1989; Hansen and Wänke, 2009; Zajonc, 1980).”
BackgroundA reappraisal of the uncanny valley: categorical perception or frequency-based sensitization?
Burleigh, T. J., & Schoenherr, J. R. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01488 · Cited by 74
Implicit preferences: The role(s) of familiarity in the structural mere exposure effect
Zizak, D. M., & Reber, A. S. (2004) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2003.12.003 · Cited by 63
The Time Course of the Aversive Conflict Signal
Fritz, J., & Dreisbach, G. (2014) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000271 · Cited by 69
Priming semantic concepts affects the dynamics of aesthetic appreciation
Faerber, S. J., Leder, H., Gerger, G., & Carbon, C. (2010) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.06.006 · Cited by 64
How can the word “NEW” evoke consumers' experiences of novelty and interest?
Sung, B., Hartley, N., Vanman, E. J., & Phau, I. (2016) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.02.010 · Cited by 69
Towards a unified model of aesthetic pleasure in design
Berghman, M., & Hekkert, P. (2017) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.03.004 · Cited by 70
“When also taking into account an object's (proto-)typicality and meaning (i.a. Bornstein, 1989; Leder, Carbon, & Ripsas, 2006; Whitfield, 1983), it broadened its scope to aspects of a more cognitive nature.”
BackgroundDeterminants of Preference: When do we like What we Know?
Leder, H. (2001) · Empirical Studies of the Arts · doi:10.2190/5tae-e5cv-xjal-3885 · Cited by 62
Valence modulates source memory for faces
Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2009) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.38.1.29 · Cited by 62
“towards familiar stimuli ( Bornstein, 1989; Zajonc, 1968).”
Storytelling during retail sales encounters
Gilliam, D. A., & Zablah, A. R. (2013) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.04.005 · Cited by 62
McDougall, S. J. P., Reppa, I., Kulik, J., & Taylor, A. (2016) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.02.006 · Cited by 68
“stimuli although this depends to some extent on whether or not the items were liked initially (Bornstein, 1989; Fang et al., 2007; McCoy et al., 2009; Monahan et al., 2001; Zajonc, 1968, 2001).”
BackgroundBuying Beauty for the Long Run: (Mis)predicting Liking of Product Aesthetics
Buechel, E. C., & Townsend, C. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucy002 · Cited by 62
When products compete for consumers attention: How selective attention affects preferences
Florack, A., Egger, M., & Hübner, R. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.009 · Cited by 63
Teaching children to like and eat vegetables
Wadhera, D., Phillips, E. D. C., & Wilkie, L. M. (2015) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.016 · Cited by 63
Subliminal techniques as propaganda tools: review and critique
Bornstein, R. F. (1989) · The Journal of mind and behavior · Cited by 62
Self-citationFinkel, E. J., Norton, M. I., Reis, H. T., Dan Ariely, C., Caprariello, P. A., Eastwick, P. W., Frost, J. H., & Maniaci, M. R. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614561682 · Cited by 68
“scholars have long argued that increasing levels of familiarity can eventually undermine liking if they exceed the experiential saturation threshold (Berlyne, 1970; Bornstein, 1989; Stang, 1975).”
BackgroundInfluentialOld Proverbs in New Skins – An fMRI Study on Defamiliarization
Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00204 · Cited by 63
Jaud, D. A., & Melnyk, V. (2019) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101964 · Cited by 63
Tinio, P. P. L., Leder, H., & Strasser, M. (2010) · Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts · doi:10.1037/a0019542 · Cited by 66
Thought Speed, Mood, and the Experience of Mental Motion
Pronin, E., & Jacobs, E. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00091.x · Cited by 67
“The effects typically emerge when stimulus repetition is subliminal (or of very brief duration) and when it involves unfamiliar and complex stimuli (e.g., Chinese ideographs and optical illusions; Bornstein, 1989; Zajonc, 1968, 2001).”
BackgroundTransfer-Appropriate Processing, Response Fluency, and the Mere Measurement Effect
Janiszewski, C., & Chandon, E. (2007) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.2.309 · Cited by 65
Thought for food: Cognitive influences on chemosensory perceptions and preferences
White, T. L., Thomas‐Danguin, T., Olofsson, J., Zucco, G. M., & Prescott, J. (2019) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103776 · Cited by 66
“In these studies, increases in the pleasantness of the stimuli occurred in the absence of changes in stimulus familiarity, suggesting a lack of cognitive mediation of the hedonic changes (Bornstein, 1989).”
BackgroundThe Value of a Smile: Does Emotional Performance Matter More in Familiar or Unfamiliar Exchanges?
Gabriel, A. S., Acosta, J., & Grandey, A. A. (2013) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9329-2 · Cited by 61
“Interacting with unfamiliar stimuli (i.e., encounters) heightens monitoring as an individual obtains information to reduce the uncertainty, activating more deliberate information processing (Bornstein 1989).”
Virtual versus human: Unraveling consumer reactions to service failures through influencer types
Zhao, T., Ran, Y., Wu, B., Wang, V. L., Zhou, L., & Wang, C. L. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114657 · Cited by 65
The alcohol warning and adolescents: 5-year effects.
Mackinnon, D. P., Nohre, L., Pentz, M., & Stacy, A. W. (2000) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.90.10.1589 · Cited by 66
Meta-Cognitive Myopia and the Dilemmas of Inductive-Statistical Inference
Fiedler, K. (2012) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394293-7.00001-7 · Cited by 66
Subliminal exposure to faces and racial attitudes: Exposure to Whites makes Whites like Blacks less
Smith, P. K., Dijksterhuis, A., & Chaiken, S. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.006 · Cited by 59
“The mere exposure effect is one of the most robust findings in social psychology (see Bornstein, 1989, for a review).”
BackgroundMethodKormos, J., Csizér, K., & Iwaniec, J. (2013) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2013.847940 · Cited by 59
“…meta-analysis of 515 studies of intergroup contact, Pettigrew and Tropp (2006) proposed that the key to the contact-attitude relation was the general psychological observation that familiarity leads to an increase in liking (Bornstein 1989), through reductions in uncertainty and anxiety (Lee 2001).”
BackgroundPerceptions of others, mindfulness, and brand experience in retail service setting
Ngo, L. V., Northey, G., Duffy, S. M., Thảo, H. T. P., & Tam, L. T. H. (2016) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.07.003 · Cited by 60
When two paradigms meet: Does evaluative learning extinguish in differential fear conditioning?
Jens Blechert, A., Michael, T., Williams, S. L., Purkis, H. M., & Wilhelm, F. H. (2007) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2007.03.003 · Cited by 59
“The mere exposure effect describes a gradual increase in liking of novel stimuli upon repeated presentation (Bornstein, 1989).”
BackgroundPredictable Effects of Visual Salience in Experimental Decisions and Games
Li, X., & Camerer, C. F. (2022) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjac025 · Cited by 72
Wang, H., Masuda, T., Ito, K., & Rashid, M. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212455828 · Cited by 58
“Humans and other organisms can inherently accommodate to the surrounding environment, and can develop preferences for familiar environments and objects (Bornstein, 1989; Cross, Halcomb, & Matter, 1967; Moreland & Beach, 1992; Zajonc, 1968).”
BackgroundRepetition and Boredom in a Perceptual Fluency/ Attributional Model of Affective Judgements
den Bergh, O. V., & Vrana, S. R. (1998) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/026999398379556 · Cited by 58
Moodie, C. S., MacKintosh, A. M., & Hammond, D. G. (2009) · European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckp199 · Cited by 61
Auditory Preferences and Aesthetics
McDermott, J. H. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-381431-9.00020-6 · Cited by 59
“Stimuli across the board are liked more with repeated exposure, at least up to a point (Zajonc, 1968), often plateauing after about 10 exposures (Bornstein, 1989).”
BackgroundNaderer, B., Matthes, J., & Zeller, P. (2017) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2017.1348034 · Cited by 58
“This mechanism states that mere repeated exposure can enhance stimulus evaluation (Bornstein 1989; Matthes, Schemer, and Wirth 2007).”
BackgroundThe mere liking effect: Attitudinal influences on attributions of moral character
Bocian, K., Baryła, W., Kulesza, W. M., Schnall, S., & Wojciszke, B. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.06.007 · Cited by 66
The influence of algorithms on political and dating decisions
Agudo, U., & Matute, H. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249454 · Cited by 65
The effect of facial symmetry on perceptions of personality and attractiveness
Noor, F., & Evans, D. C. (2003) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00022-9 · Cited by 57
Positive and Negative Opinion Modeling: The Influence of Another's Similarity and Dissimilarity.
Hilmert, C. J., Kulik, J. A., & Christenfeld, N. J. S. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.44 · Cited by 57
Silva, R. R., Chrobot, N., Newman, E. J., Schwarz, N., & Topolinski, S. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02200 · Cited by 56
“The absence of a repetition effect, however, was quite surprising in light of extensive work on the mere exposure effect (see Bornstein, 1989).”
BackgroundSubliminal advertising and the psychology of processing unconscious stimuli: A review of research
Theus, K. T. (1994) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.4220110306 · Cited by 57
Recognising what you like: Examining the relation between the mere-exposure effect and recognition
Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2006) · The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440500487454 · Cited by 60
“They have been demonstrated in over 200 experiments involving a diverse range of stimuli from strings of consonants (Newell & Bright, 2001) to sequences of tones (Szpunar, Schellenberg, & Pliner, 2004) (for a review, see Bornstein, 1989 ).”
BackgroundKronrod, A., & Huber, J. C. (2018) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.11.008 · Cited by 60
“These latter findings are consistent with an inverted-U effect of repetition on attitudes (Anand & Sternthal, 1990; Bornstein, 1989; Cacioppo & Petty, 1979; Janiszewski & Meyvis, 2001; Kirmani, 1997; Nordhielm, 2002).”
ResultDoes the environmental inequality matter? A literature review
Shao, S., Liu, L., & Tian, Z. (2021) · Environmental Geochemistry and Health · doi:10.1007/s10653-021-00921-2 · Cited by 56
Testing the Effects of Incidental Advertising Exposure in Online Gaming Environment
Acar, A. (2007) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2007.10722136 · Cited by 61
The devil you know: The effect of brand recognition and product ratings on consumer choice
Thoma, V., & Williams, A. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500004484 · Cited by 57
Getting in Touch: How imagined, actual, and physical contact affect evaluations of robots
Wullenkord, R., Fraune, M. R., Eyssel, F., & Šabanović, S. (2016) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2016.7745228 · Cited by 56
“The findings in this study that contact with the robots increased liking of them relates to the mere exposure effect (i.e., that familiarity with something relates to liking it) [40].”
BackgroundCommuting by car or public transportation? A social dilemma analysis of travel mode judgements
van Vugt, M., Lange, P. A. M. V., & Meertens, R. M. (1996) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199605)26:3 · Cited by 180
Interactive effects of personality and frequency of exposure on liking for music
Hunter, P. G., & Schellenberg, E. G. (2010) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.021 · Cited by 55
“This mere exposure effect has been replicated many times, primarily with visual stimuli (see Bornstein, 1989 for a review), although increases in liking as a consequence of exposure are also evident for music (e.g., Meyer, 1903; Moore & Gilliland, 1924; Mull, 1957; Peretz, Gaudreau, & Bonnel, 1998;…”
BackgroundPerceived risks and restaurant visit intentions in China: Do online customer reviews matter?
Huifeng, P., Ha, H., & Lee, J.-W. (2020) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.04.005 · Cited by 59
Tourism Destination Image and Visit Intention: Examining the Role of Familiarity
Yang, J., Yuan, B., & Hu, P. (2009) · Journal of China Tourism Research · doi:10.1080/19388160902910557 · Cited by 55
“A number of psychological studies (Bornstein, 1989 ; Bornstein & D'Agostino, 1992 ) showed that the increased familiarity tends to elevate the level of affection toward a beloved (here a destination).”
BackgroundThe Mere Exposure Phenomenon: A Lingering Melody by Robert Zajonc
Moreland, R. L., & Topolinski, S. (2010) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073910375479 · Cited by 59
“Bob and I received some vindication years later from a meta-analysis by Bornstein (1989) of research on the mere exposure phenomenon.”
Purmehdi, M., Legoux, R., Carrillat, F., & Senecal, S. (2017) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.14.047 · Cited by 55
Bjørnestad, J. R., Hegelstad, W. T. V., Joa, I., Davidson, L., Larsen, T. K., Melle, I. S., Veseth, M., Johannessen, J. O., & Brønnick, K. (2017) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.05.041 · Cited by 59
Weber, E. U., Goldstein, W. M., & Barlas, S. (1995) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60307-2 · Cited by 54
Familiar eyes are smiling: on the role of familiarity in the perception of facial affect
Claypool, H. M., Hugenberg, K., Housley, M. K., & Mackie, D. M. (2007) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.422 · Cited by 58
“, Bornstein & D’Agostino, 1994; Jacoby & Dallas, 1981). Importantly, numerous scholars have argued that this sensation itself is positive (e.g., Garcia-Marques & Mackie, 2000; Reber, Schwarz, & Winkielman, 2004). The most direct evidence for this notion was provided by Winkielman and Cacioppo (2001), who showed that t…”
BackgroundBrand equity: extending brand awareness and liking with Signal Detection Theory
Ye, G., & van Raaij, W. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527260410001693794 · Cited by 55
“The depth of processing consumers engage in during encoding (study phase) may be indicated with various controls, such as repetition (Zajonc, 1968; Bornstein, 1989; Nordhielm, 2002), selfrelated generation (Craik and Tulving, 1975), stimulus presentation duration (Bornstein, 1989) and level of…”
BackgroundInfluentialPreferences Need No Inferences?: The Cognitive Basis of Unconscious Mere Exposure Effects
Klinger, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1994) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-410560-7.50010-7 · Cited by 55
Using research syntheses to plan future research.
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1994) · Cited by 55
Exposure effects and affective responses to music
Brentar, J. E., Neuendorf, K. A., & Armstrong, G. B. (1994) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759409376330 · Cited by 54
Cognitive realism and memory in Proust’s madeleine episode
Troscianko, E. T. (2013) · Memory Studies · doi:10.1177/1750698012468000 · Cited by 54
“The exposure effect is the pleasure we find in and preferences we form for familiarity; this welldocumented phenomenon can be explained with recourse to the positive emotion that results from processing fluency (Bornstein, 1989).”
BackgroundValuing what happens: a biogenic approach to valence and (potentially) affect
Lyon, P., & Kuchling, F. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0752 · Cited by 59
“Nevertheless, in 2017, the first meta-analysis of experiments in the quarter-century since a seminal review [61] concluded that more recent findings where subliminal effects were tested were ‘consistent with the proposition that conscious awareness is unnecessary for operation of the mere exposure effect’ [67, p.”
BackgroundInfluentialInfant Mortality, Social Networks, and Subsequent Fertility
Sandberg, J. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100206 · Cited by 54
“…has been consistently shown in cognitive psychological research to be a powerful force in influencing affective dispositions, liking, and attitudes across a wide variety of situations (including social situations), cultures, and even species (Bornstein 1989; Bornstein, Leone, and Galley 1987).”
BackgroundEntrepreneurial Well-Being: The Payoff Structure of Business Creation
Shir, N. (2015) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.32847.74407/1 · Cited by 55
“Seeing is being”: Consumer culture and the positioning of premium cars in China
Bartikowski, B., & Cleveland, M. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.008 · Cited by 54
Eye Movement Correlates of Expertise in Visual Arts
Francuz, P., Zaniewski, I., Augustynowicz, P., Kopiś-Posiej, N., & Jankowski, T. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00087 · Cited by 62
Effects of liking on visual attention in faces and paintings
Goller, J., Mitrovic, A., & Leder, H. (2019) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.05.008 · Cited by 54
Pham, D. T., Jones, P. K., Dobson, S., Liñán, F., & Viala, C. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.051 · Cited by 60
Grimes, A., & Kitchen, P. J. (2007) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.1177/147078530704900205 · Cited by 54
Probability Judgment across Cultures
Yates, J. F., Lee, J., Sieck, W. R., Choi, I., & Price, P. C. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.017 · Cited by 55
Araujo, T., & Bol, N. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100030 · Cited by 68
Routine and feelings of safety, confidence, and well‐being
Avni‐Babad, D. (2010) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712610x513617 · Cited by 52
Kulczynski, A., Ilicic, J., & Baxter, S. M. (2015) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20857 · Cited by 53
Houwer, J. D., & Hughes, S. (2016) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2016.34.5.480 · Cited by 53
On the joys of perceiving: Affect as feedback for perceptual predictions
Четвериков, А. А., & Kristjansson, A. K. (2016) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.005 · Cited by 53
“A meta-analysis by Bornstein (1989) showed that the mere exposure effect is, in fact, stronger with subliminal than supraliminal exposure.”
Kuipers, T. A. F. (2002) · Synthese · doi:10.1023/a:1016188509393 · Cited by 52
“All these phenomena seem to be related to the so-called ‘mere-exposure effect’ which has been studied in experimental psychology (Zajonc 1968; Temme 1983; Bornstein 1989; Ye 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialMantzari, E., Vogt, F., & Marteau, T. M. (2012) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-12-24 · Cited by 53
Age of acquisition and the recognition of brand names: On the importance of being early
Ellis, A. W., Holmes, S. J., & Wright, R. L. (2009) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.08.001 · Cited by 52
Hughes, J., Lolliot, S., Hewstone, M., Schmid, K., & Carlisle, K. (2012) · Policy Futures in Education · doi:10.2304/pfie.2012.10.5.528 · Cited by 52
“Although the effects of contact may partly be due to mere exposure (i.e. the principle that familiarity fosters liking; see Bornstein, 1989), a variety of more sophisticated cognitive and affective mechanisms are instrumental.”
BackgroundCarroll, R., & Luna, D. (2011) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367400306 · Cited by 52
The impact of event advertising on attitudes and visit intentions
Kim, S.-S., & Jun, J. (2016) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2016.04.002 · Cited by 53
“This result is consistent with previous literature about marketing communication effects via event advertising on consumer's attitude (Bornstein, 1989; Giffani & Rivenburgh, 2000; Jago et al., 2003; Qu et al., 2011; Xue et al., 2012; Zajonc, 1968).”
ResultBem, D., Tressoldi, P. E., Rabeyron, T., & Duggan, M. (2015) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.7177.1 · Cited by 52
Innate and learned components of human visual preference
Rentschler, I., Jüttner, M., Unzicker, A., & Landis, T. (1999) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80306-6 · Cited by 52
How Does Collective Memory Create a Sense of the Collective?
Lambert, A. J., Scherer, L. N., Rogers, C. S., & Jacoby, L. L. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511626999.011 · Cited by 49
“one’s recollections may be more important than whether that overlap is actually present. For example, many Americans are likely to feel that they have a psychological bond with at least some other Americans in terms of their emotional experiences surrounding several disparate historical events. Depending on their age…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe role of exposure in emotional responses to music
Schellenberg, E. G. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x08005499 · Cited by 53
We Mostly Think Alike: Individual Differences in Attitude Towards AI in Sweden and Japan
Persson, A., Laaksoharju, M., & Koga, H. (2021) · The Review of Socionetwork Strategies · doi:10.1007/s12626-021-00071-y · Cited by 51
“Simply put: people tend to have a stronger preference and warmer feelings for stimuli and things they are repeatedly exposed to [19].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Bornstein, R. F.
- Affiliations
- Gettysburg College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bornstein, Robert F.
- ORCID
- Bornstein, Robert F.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 265-289
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2051913671
- Cited by
- 1,970
- References
- 195
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 95 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 100 · 2012: 95
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- exposure, affect, stimulus sensitivity, stimulus complexity, stimulus type, exposure duration, age of exposure, personality, advertising, phobia treatment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review