The DOI matches its Crossref record; 195 of the 195 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987.
Abstract
L'auteur analyse les effets de variables methodologiques (type et complexite du stimulus, intervalle de presentation, temps d'exposition) et de variables subjectives (âge d'exposition, personnalite) sur la sensibilite du sujet aux stimulus de toutes sortes. Il conclut sur l'interet methodologique de sa recherche, ainsi que sur ses apports pratiques (publicite, traitement de la phobie)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In general, individuals prefer the familiar to the unknown because more risks are involved about the unknown [49,50].”
From Consumer Responses to Generative AI Chatbots Versus Search Engines for Product Evaluation (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“Research in psychology has shown that repeated exposure to a stimulus increases preference for it even when listeners are unaware of the repetition (Zajonc 1968;Bornstein 1989)”
From The Algorithmic Flattening of Sound: Computational Evidence and Justice Implications of AI Music Homogenization (2026) · cites this paper as Bornstein 1989
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure
Zajonc, R. B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025848 · Cited by 6,745
Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms
Hollander, E. P., & Homans, G. C. (1963) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419191 · Cited by 4,708
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
The associative basis of the creative process.
Mednick, S. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0048850 · Cited by 4,140
A personality scale of manifest anxiety
Taylor, J. A. (1953) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0056264 · Cited by 3,131
The Teacher's Word Book of 30, 000 Words
Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. D. (2018) · Cited by 2,656
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,001
The Attractiveness of Average Faces is Not a Generalized Mere Exposure Effect
Rhodes, G., Halberstadt, J. B., Jeffery, L., & Palermo, R. (2005) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2005.23.3.205 · Cited by 30
“This was not due to lack of power of the exposure manipulation itself (which was well within the optimal range cited in Bornstein’s [1989] meta–analysis).”
BackgroundThe dissociation paradigm and its discontents: How can unconscious perception or memory be inferred?
Snodgrass, M. (2004) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2003.11.001 · Cited by 30
Aesthetics as Pre-linguistic Knowledge: A Psychological Perspective
Whitfield, T. W. A. (2005) · Design Issues · doi:10.1162/0747936053103002 · Cited by 30
Normal Mere Exposure Effect with Impaired Recognition in Alzheimer's Disease
Willems, S. J., Adam, S., & der Linden, M. V. (2002) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70640-3 · Cited by 31
“Indeed, mere exposure effect does not seem to be favoured by long exposure duration or detailed perceptual encoding (Bornstein, 1989).”
BackgroundThe ‘value’ of smoking: An editorial
Slovic, P. (2012) · Health Risk & Society · doi:10.1080/13698575.2012.692774 · Cited by 29
“Repetitive exposure to smoking and cigarette brands through advertising probably creates positive affect by means of what is known as ‘the mere exposure effect’ (Zajonc 1980 , Bornstein 1989 ).”
BackgroundKopp, T., Baumgartner, M., & Kinkel, S. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103095 · Cited by 34
Pham, A. D., Nguyen, H. N., Le, T. T. H., Nguyen, H. K., Khuat, H. T., Phan, H. T. T., & Vu, H. T. (2024) · Young Consumers Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers · doi:10.1108/yc-07-2023-1785 · Cited by 36
Exploring the Subjective Feeling of Fluency
Forster, M., Leder, H., & Ulrich Ansorge, A. (2016) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000311 · Cited by 33
“Our manipulation of processing fluency (based on varying the presentation durations) is different from mere exposure manipulations (for a review see Bornstein, 1989) in which the higher ease of processing originates from stimulus repetition.”
COVID‐19, leadership and lessons from physics
Roberts, R. J. (2020) · Australian Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/ajr.12649 · Cited by 29
Musicality: Instinct or Acquired Skill?
Marcus, G. (2012) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01220.x · Cited by 29
“…than adults ( Hargreaves & North , 1999 ) , and in any domain , music included ( North & Bargreaves , 1995 ; Schellenberg , Peretz , & Vieillard , 2008 ; Szpunar , Schellenberg , & Pliner , 2004 ) , people have a tendency to come to like that which is familiar ( Bornstein , 1989 ; Zajonc , 1968 ) .”
BackgroundDynamic Exposure to Alcohol Advertising in a Sports Context Influences Implicit Attitudes
Zerhouni, O., Bègue, L., Duke, A. A., & Flaudias, V. (2016) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.12966 · Cited by 30
Daftary‐Kapur, T., Penrod, S., O’Connor, M., & Wallace, B. (2014) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/lhb0000081 · Cited by 29
Amitai, N., Weber, M., Swerdlow, N. R., Sharp, R. F., Breier, M. R., Halberstadt, A. L., & Young, J. W. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.09.007 · Cited by 28
van Giesen, R. I., Fischer, A. R. H., & van Trijp, J. C. M. (2016) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662516661292 · Cited by 28
“Affective responses do not necessarily require conscious elaboration and can be created more quickly (Bornstein, 1989; Hansen and Wänke, 2009; Zajonc, 1980).”
BackgroundThe Mere Exposure Instruction Effect
Dessel, P. V., Mertens, G., Smith, C. T., & Houwer, J. D. (2017) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000376 · Cited by 29
Examining confirmation biases: implications of sponsor congruency
Devlin, M. B., & Billings, A. C. (2018) · International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship · doi:10.1108/ijsms-10-2016-0078 · Cited by 28
How focused identities can help brands navigate a changing media landscape
Brasel, S. A. (2012) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2012.01.005 · Cited by 28
Affective Monitoring: A Generic Mechanism for Affect Elicitation
Phaf, R. H., & Rotteveel, M. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00047 · Cited by 32
Moving Beyond Identification: Using Gamification To Attract and Retain Talent
Lowman, G. H. (2016) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2016.70 · Cited by 27
“The U.S. Army also uses America’s Army to attract talent.”
BackgroundInfluentialEducation biases perception of social robots
Szczepanowski, R., Cichoń, E., Arent, K., Sobecki, J. F., Styrkowiec, P., Florkowski, M., & Gakis, M. (2020) · European Review of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.erap.2020.100521 · Cited by 27
Perception and Evaluation of Buildings: The Effects of Style and Frequency of Exposure
Ng, C. F. (2020) · Collabra Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.324 · Cited by 28
Familiar and Fluent! Style-Related Processing Hypotheses in Aesthetic Appreciation
Leder, H. (2003) · Empirical Studies of the Arts · doi:10.2190/g6mk-6kl7-ketb-elnd · Cited by 27
“Some researchers have found effects of exposure frequency in laboratory experiments using complex stimuli such as real artworks but there is also a number of studies in which effects of mere-exposure in laboratory experiments were not found (see Bornstein, 1989).”
BackgroundMethodGarcía‐Burgos, D., & Zamora, M. C. (2014) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.003 · Cited by 27
Cognitive Mediation of Hedonic Changes to Odors Following Exposure
Prescott, J., Kim, H., & Kim, K.-O. (2007) · Chemosensory Perception · doi:10.1007/s12078-007-9004-y · Cited by 27
“In fact, exposing a stimulus for sufficient time to allow analysis of its features may inhibit ME effects, a finding that has been used to argue that these effects occur without intervening cognitive mediation ( Bornstein 1989 ).”
BackgroundTeacher judgments as measures of children's cognitive ability: A multilevel analysis
Baudson, T. G., Fischbach, A., & Preckel, F. (2014) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.06.001 · Cited by 31
Changing the Tune: Listeners Like Music that Expresses a Contrasting Emotion
Schellenberg, E. G., Corrigall, K. A., Ladinig, O., & Huron, D. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00574 · Cited by 27
den Uijl, L. C., Jager, G., Zandstra, E. H., de Graaf, C., & Kremer, S. (2016) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.002 · Cited by 27
50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology
Sitzman, D. M., & Rhodes, M. G. (2011) · Inquiry Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines · doi:10.5840/inquiryctnews201126222 · Cited by 27
Positive mood, attribution, and the illusion of familiarity
Claypool, H. M., Hall, C. E., Mackie, D. M., & Garcia‐Marques, T. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.05.001 · Cited by 27
Effect of Repeated Evaluation and Repeated Exposure on Acceptability Ratings of Sentences
Zervakis, J., & Mazuka, R. (2012) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-012-9233-3 · Cited by 26
Feelings in Design – A Neuroevolutionary Perspective On Process And Knowledge
Whitfield, T. W. A. (2007) · The Design Journal · doi:10.2752/146069207789271939 · Cited by 16
“To think, or not to think, that is the question”.
Winter, S., Macpherson, A. C., & Collins, D. J. (2013) · Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology · doi:10.1037/spy0000007 · Cited by 27
Withdrawing Versus Withholding Freedoms: Nudging and the Case of Tobacco Control
Schmidt, A. T. (2016) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2016.1180442 · Cited by 26
Shen, X., & Ferguson, M. J. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104219 · Cited by 27
Aggressive behaviour of anti-vaxxers and their toxic replies in English and Japanese
Miyazaki, K., Uchiba, T., Tanaka, K., & Sasahara, K. (2022) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01245-x · Cited by 26
“The repeated exposure to the same belief can affect people’s perception efficiently, in what is known as the ‘mere exposure effect’ (Bornstein, 1989a), coupled with subliminal techniques often used in propaganda (Bornstein, 1989b; Bornstein and D’agostino, 1992).”
Implicit sponsorship effects for a prominent brand
Herrmann, J.-L., Corneille, O., Derbaix, C. M., Kacha, M., & Walliser, B. (2014) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-11-2011-0624 · Cited by 31
Situational Determinants of Envy and Schadenfreude
Piskorz, J., & Piskorz, Z. (2009) · Polish Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.2478/s10059-009-0030-2 · Cited by 26
“According to the “rule of closeness – attractiveness” we like people with whom we have more frequent contacts (Bornstein, 1989; Zajonc, 1985).”
BackgroundAffective Consequences of Intentional Action Control
Gollwitzer, P. M., Martiny-Huenger, T., & Oettingen, G. (2014) · Advances in motivation science · doi:10.1016/bs.adms.2014.08.002 · Cited by 26
“In his meta-analysis, Bornstein (1989) concluded that the mere exposure effect was robust with a moderate effect size of r 1⁄4 0.”
MethodHassan, L. M., Shiu, E. M. K., Thrasher, J. F., Fong, G. T., & Hastings, G. (2007) · International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing · doi:10.1002/nvsm.328 · Cited by 27
Making friends: A nonexperimental analysis of social pair formation
Foster, G. (2005) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726705061313 · Cited by 26
“…the dyadic friendship-formation process emphasizes the importance of potentially random factors, such as geographical distance or mere exposure (see Bornstein, 1989), many authors in both psychology and sociology report that similarity along a range of personal attributes should or does increase…”
BackgroundBornstein, R. F., Ng, H., Gallagher, H. A., Kloss, D. M., & Regier, N. G. (2005) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00327.x · Cited by 26
Self-citationVirtual social interactions: Evolutionary, social psychological and technological perspectives
Mahfouz, A. Y., Philaretou, A. G., & Theocharous, A. L. (2008) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.05.008 · Cited by 26
“In turn, the more their online exposure, the more likely it becomes for them to exchange positive online dating interactions and evaluations (Bornstein, 1989).”
BackgroundInverted U-shaped model: How frequent repetition affects perceived risk
Xi, L., Xie, X., & Liu, L. (2015) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500004629 · Cited by 26
“Psychological research has accumulated a large literature on the mere exposure effect of neutral stimuli, its reasons, and its outcomes (see Bornstein, 1989; Zajonc, 2001 as reviews).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAustralians' views on carbon pricing before and after the 2013 federal election
Dreyer, S. J., Walker, I. A., McCoy, S. K., & Teisl, M. F. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2756 · Cited by 26
Investors' Processing of Financial Communications: A Persuasion Perspective
Hamilton, E. L., & Winchel, J. (2018) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria-52211 · Cited by 27
Ric, F. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204264661 · Cited by 27
“…out of awareness and that they sometimes disappear when individuals become conscious of the primes or can make use of more controlled processes (Bargh, Chaiken, et al., 1996; Murphy & Zajonc, 1993; Rotteveel et al., 2001; see also Bornstein, 1989, for a related analysis of mere exposure effect).”
BackgroundWhither learning, whither memory?
Stadler, M. A., & Frensch, P. A. (1994) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00035342 · Cited by 26
(2008) · ASHE Higher Education Report · doi:10.1002/aehe.3402 · Cited by 26
The Moderating Impact of Distal Regularities on the Effect of Stimulus Pairings.
Hughes, S., de Houwer, J., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016) · Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000310 · Cited by 27
“variety of ways, from mere exposure (Bornstein, 1989), to socialization (Pettigrew & Tropp, 2006), descriptive information (Rydell & McConnell, 2006), and category membership (Pinter & Greenwald, 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialA Primer on the Psychology of Cognitive Bias
MacLean, C. L., & Dror, I. E. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802460-7.00001-2 · Cited by 26
Development of a measure to evaluate competence perceptions of natural and social science
Kirby, C. K., Jaimes, P., Lorenz-Reaves, A. R., & Libarkin, J. C. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0209311 · Cited by 25
A mind stretched: The psychology of repeat consumption
O’Brien, E. (2020) · Consumer Psychology Review · doi:10.1002/arcp.1062 · Cited by 28
“Bornstein's later meta-analytic techniques advanced Zajonc's findings by suggesting that such boosts grow stronger as repeated stimuli are less consciously perceived (e.g., via shorter exposures: Bornstein, 1989).”
BackgroundBian, X., & Wang, K.-Y. (2015) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-08-2013-0414 · Cited by 26
Emotional Persuasion in Advertising: A Hierarchy-of-Processing Model
Heath, R. G. (2007) · The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) · Cited by 24
Jeong, C., & Holland, S. (2012) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2012.701162 · Cited by 30
“In addition, according to the “mere exposure effect,” the amount of information exposure may positively increase perceived image (Bornstein, 1989; HarmonJones & Allen, 2001; Janiszewski, 1993).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialDistractor devaluation effect in the attentional blink: Direct evidence for distractor inhibition.
Kihara, K., Yagi, Y., Takeda, Y., & Kawahara, J. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0019948 · Cited by 25
Comparing double jeopardy effects at the behavioral and attitudinal levels
Bandyopadhyay, S. K., & Gupta, K. (2004) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/10610420410538078 · Cited by 26
“In these studies (see, for example, Bornstein, 1989”
BackgroundExposure Is Not Enough: Suppressing Stimuli from Awareness Can Abolish the Mere Exposure Effect
de Zilva, D., Vu, L., Newell, B. R., & Pearson, J. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077726 · Cited by 25
Familiarity increases subjective positive affect even in non-affective and non-evaluative contexts
Garcia‐Marques, T., Prada, M., & Mackie, D. M. (2016) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-016-9555-9 · Cited by 25
“The relationship between familiarity and positive affect was taken for granted in the literature which, for years, continued to accumulate replications of the mere-exposure effect: people like familiar stimuli (Zajonc 1968; for a review see Bornstein 1989).”
BackgroundCULTURAL ADAPTABILITY AND LEADING ACROSS CULTURES
Deal, J. J., Leslie, J. B., Dalton, M. A., & Ernst, C. (2004) · Advances in global leadership · doi:10.1016/s1535-1203(02)03008-3 · Cited by 25
“In 1989, Bornstein explained this concept further: “It’s advantageous to human beings to prefer the familiar to the novel. The familiar is safe and predictable; the unfamiliar is unsafe and unpredictable” (p. 282). Bornstein (1989) argued that preference for the familiar is an adaptive human trait, but that the prefer…”
BackgroundThe eye tracks the aesthetic appeal of sentences
Hoshi, H., & Menninghaus, W. (2018) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/18.3.19 · Cited by 24
“, more frequently presented stimuli are preferred over less frequently presented ones), a positive relationship between familiarity-driven ease of cognitive processing and aesthetic liking/preference, has been repeatedly confirmed (Bornstein, 1989; Martindale & Moore, 1988).”
BackgroundShape familiarity modulates preference for curvature in drawings of common-use objects
Chuquichambi, E. G., Palumbo, L., Rey, C., & Munar, E. (2021) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.11772 · Cited by 24
“Contrary to representational stimuli, Bornstein (1989) found that abstract paintings, drawings, and matrices did not show a strong mere exposure effect.”
BackgroundI’ve heard that brand before: the role of music recognition on consumer choice
Anglada-Tort, M., Schofield, K., Trahan, T., & Müllensiefen, D. (2022) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2022.2060568 · Cited by 24
“For example, studies show that people prefer stimuli they have previously seen, even if they were not aware of seeing them (see Bornstein 1989, for a review); and consumer preferences for products relate to their familiarity or brand awareness (Hoyer and Brown 1990; Coates, Butler, and Berry 2004).”
BackgroundMuth, C., Raab, M. H., & Carbon, C. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00043 · Cited by 24
Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2013) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0120-2 · Cited by 24
Once is not enough: repeated exposure to and aesthetic evaluation of an automobile design prototype
Coughlan, P., & Mashman, R. (1999) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(99)00007-1 · Cited by 24
The Social Environment of Public Transport
Thomas, J. (2010) · Figshare · doi:10.26686/wgtn.16967875.v1 · Cited by 18
Garfin, D. R., Holman, E. A., Fischhoff, B., Wong-Parodi, G., & Silver, R. C. (2022) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103059 · Cited by 24
From easy to known: How fluent brand processing fosters self‐brand connection
DelVecchio, D. S., Jones, W. J., & Baugh, L. A. (2023) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21951 · Cited by 26
Growing Up in a Globalized Society
Rekker, R. (2018) · Young · doi:10.1177/1103308817748433 · Cited by 23
“This principle has been demonstrated in an extensive body of experimental studies in which participants were exposed to attitude objects by varying degrees (Bornstein, 1989).”
BackgroundBall, L. J., Threadgold, E., Marsh, J. E., & Christensen, B. T. (2018) · Metaphor and Symbol · doi:10.1080/10926488.2018.1481255 · Cited by 24
When Affective Relation Weighs More Than the Mug Handle: Investigating Affective Affordances
Caravà, M., & Scorolli, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01928 · Cited by 25
“Hence, provided that the increased frequency of exposure might influence the agent’s perception of the a ff ective values of objects (Zajonc, 1968; Bornstein, 1989; Garcia-Marquez et al., 2016) and her expectations on their a ff ective regulative e ff ects, we suggest that proper AAs are instantiated…”
BackgroundEffects of co-branding on consumers' purchase intention and evaluation of apparel attributes
Wu, D. G., & Chalip, L. (2013) · Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science · doi:10.1080/21639159.2013.852910 · Cited by 24
“It is, of course, possible that repeated exposure to a brand combination will make it more attractive (cf. Bornstein, 1989).”
BackgroundThe “Name-Ease” Effect and Its Dual Impact on Importance Judgments
Labroo, A. A., Lambotte, S., & Zhang, Y. (2009) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02477.x · Cited by 23
“Ample research has established that feelings serve as information and affect one’s judgments (Berlyne, 1966; Bornstein, 1989; Koriat & Levy-Sadot, 2001; Mandler, 1980; Mandler, Nakamura, & Van Zandt, 1987; Schwarz, 2004; Schwarz & Clore, 2007; Zajonc, 1968, 1980).”
Social Preference in Preschoolers: Effects of Morphological Self-Similarity and Familiarity
Richter, N., Tiddeman, B., & Haun, D. B. M. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145443 · Cited by 23
The Role of Familiarity for Representations in Norm-Based Face Space
Faerber, S. J., Kaufmann, J. M., Leder, H., Martin, E. M., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155380 · Cited by 23
“More typical faces are perceived as more familiar [14], and are attributed with more positive characteristics (likability, attractiveness) [14, 44, 45].”
BackgroundInvestigation of social cognitive career theory for minority recruitment in school psychology.
Bocanegra, J. O., Gubi, A. A., & Cappaert, K. J. (2016) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1037/spq0000142 · Cited by 23
Martínez‐Tur, V., Estreder, Y., Moliner, C., Gracia, E., Pătraș, L., & Zornoza, A. M. (2018) · Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability · doi:10.3109/13668250.2017.1416256 · Cited by 23
“For decades, research has strongly supported the mere-exposure effect for a wide range of objects and situations (Bornstein, 1989; Jones, Young, & Claypool, 2011; Young, Jones, & Claypool, 2016; Zajonc, 1968).”
BackgroundHow Good Are Fast and Frugal Heuristics?
Gigerenzer, G., Czerlinski, J., & Martignon, L. F. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.033 · Cited by 24
Does Popularity Matter in a TV Song Competition? Evidence from a National Music Contest
Budzinski, O., & Pannicke, J. (2017) · Creative Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/17510694.2022.2147332 · Cited by 22
“The latter is a psychological phenomenon by which individuals tend to favour and positively value individuals or stimuli simply because they are exposed to it repetitively (inter alia, Bornstein 1989; Zajonc 1968, 2001; Moreland and Zajonc 1982; Olivola and Todorov 2010).”
Liu, Y., Chen, M., & Wang, Q. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.987716 · Cited by 22
“…as an independent variable, the impacts of typicality perception and novelty perception on aesthetic response have been examined (Pedersen, 1986; Bornstein, 1989; Hekkert and van Wieringen, 1990; Repp, 1997; Veryzer and Hutchinson, 1998; Reber et al., 2004), but there is no consensus among the…”
BackgroundDevelopment and Acquisition of Food Likes
Mela, D. J. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-04601-2_2 · Cited by 22
At the Roots of Product Placement: The Mere Exposure Effect
Ruggieri, S., & Boca, S. (2013) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.v9i2.522 · Cited by 21
“It has been shown, in fact, that the effect occurs even when a person is unaware of having been exposed to stimulus, that is, when the stimuli introduced remain outside the person’s awareness (Bonanno & Stillings, 1986; Bornstein, 1989; Bornstein, Leone, & Galley, 1987; Kunst-Wilson & Zajonc, 1980; Mandler, Nakamura,…”
BackgroundInfluentialChanging patterns of foreign movie imports, tastes, and consumption in Australia
Park, S. (2014) · Journal of Cultural Economics · doi:10.1007/s10824-014-9216-3 · Cited by 22
“Psychologists have studied the concept of exposure effects in numerous experimental settings and found a positive correlation between frequency of exposure and affective preferences (Bornstein 1989).”
BackgroundRatneswaran, C., Chisnall, B., Li, M., Tan, S. B., Douiri, A., Anantham, D., & Steier, J. S. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012693 · Cited by 22
Interest, But Not Liking, Drives Consumer Preference toward Novelty
Sung, B., Vanman, E. J., & Hartley, N. (2019) · Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) · doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.06.003 · Cited by 22
Conceptual metaphors, processing fluency, and aesthetic preference
Zhang, L., Atari, M., Schwarz, N., Newman, E. J., & Afhami, R. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104247 · Cited by 27
The Evolutionary Rationality of Social Learning
McElreath, R. L., Wallin, A., & Fasolo, B. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0014 · Cited by 23
Effects of Interestingness on Evaluations of TV Commercials
Alwitt, L. F. (2000) · Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising · doi:10.1080/10641734.2000.10505100 · Cited by 22
Source amnesia, misattribution, and the power of unconscious perceptions and memories.
Bornstein, R. F. (1999) · Psychoanalytic Psychology · doi:10.1037//0736-9735.16.2.155 · Cited by 22
Self-citationFransen, M., Fennis, B., & Pruyn, A. (2010) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650210368251 · Cited by 25
“This effect has proven to be robust for various types of stimuli and various evaluation procedures (see Bornstein, 1989 for a review).”
BackgroundSeeing two faces together: preference formation in humans and rhesus macaques
Méary, D., Li, Z., Li, W., Guo, K., & Pascalis, O. (2014) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-014-0742-3 · Cited by 22
“2013) and other cognitive, social, and emotional factors, as illustrated by the effects of mere exposure (Zajonc 1968), affects (Bornstein 1989) or category learning (Rentschler et al.”
BackgroundImpact of web banner advertising frequency on attitude
Hussain, R., Ferdous, A. S., & Mort, G. S. (2018) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-04-2017-0063 · Cited by 25
Haugtvedt, C. P., & Seminar, T. C. P. (1997) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0601_07 · Cited by 22
I Like It, but Only When I'm Not Sure Why: Evaluative Conditioning and the Awareness Issue
Hammerl, M. (2000) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1006/ccog.1999.0401 · Cited by 22
Watson, L. A., Hegtvedt, K. A., Johnson, C., Parris, C. L., & Subramanyam, S. (2017) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci7010013 · Cited by 23
The Alcohol–Sport Nexus and How Consumers Are Affected Through Sponsorship
Kelly, S. J., & Ireland, M. J. (2019) · International Journal of Sport Communication · doi:10.1123/ijsc.2018-0153 · Cited by 21
Getting More Out of Wine: wine experts, wine apps and sensory science
Smith, B. (2019) · Current Opinion in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2019.10.007 · Cited by 21
The Effects of Facial Attractiveness and Familiarity on Facial Expression Recognition
Li, J., He, D., Zhou, L., Zhao, X., Zhao, T.-T., Zhang, W., & He, X.-Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02496 · Cited by 18
“In addition, previous research illustrates that familiar stimuli prompt diverse positive reactions (Zajonc, 1968; Bornstein, 1989).”
BackgroundSoerensen, J., Wæhrens, S. S., & Byrne, D. V. (2015) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/joss.12164 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Bornstein, R. F.
- Affiliations
- Gettysburg College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bornstein, Robert F.
- ORCID
- Bornstein, Robert F.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 265-289
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2051913671
- Cited by
- 1,970
- References
- 195
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 95 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 100 · 2012: 95
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- exposure, affect, stimulus sensitivity, stimulus complexity, stimulus type, exposure duration, age of exposure, personality, advertising, phobia treatment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review